Search

The rapid spread of African swine fever (ASF) in recent years has once again raised awareness of the need to improve our preparedness in preventing and managing outbreaks, for which modelling-based forecasts can play an important role. This is even more important in the case of a disease such as ASF, involving several types of hosts, characterised by a high case-fatality rate and for which there is currently no treatment or vaccine. Within the framework of the ASF challenge, we proposed a modelling approach based on a stochastic mechanistic model and an inference procedure to estimate key transmission parameters from provided data (incomplete and noisy) and generate forecasts for unobserved time horizons. The model is partly data driven and composed of two modules, corresponding to epidemic and demographic dynamics in domestic pig and wild boar (WB) populations, interconnected through the networks of animal trade and/or spatial proximity. The inference consists in an iterative procedure, alternating between the two models and based on a criterion optimisation. Estimates of transmission and detection parameters appeared to be of similar magnitude for each of the three periods of the challenge, except for the transmission rates in WB population through contact with infectious individuals and carcasses, higher during the first period. The predicted number of infected domestic pig farms was in overall agreement with the data. The proportion of positive tested WB was overestimated, but with a trend close to that observed in the data. Comparison of the spatial simulated and observed distributions of detected cases also showed an overestimation of the spread of the pathogen within WB metapopulation. Beyond the quantitative results and the inherent difficulties of real-time forecasting, we built a modelling framework that is flexible enough to accommodate changes in transmission processes and control measures that may occur during an epidemic emergency., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Robust epidemiological knowledge and predictive modelling tools are needed to address challenging objectives, such as: understanding epidemic drivers; forecasting epidemics; and prioritising control measures. Often, multiple modelling approaches can be used during an epidemic to support effective decision making in a timely manner. Modelling challenges contribute to understanding the pros and cons of different approaches and to fostering technical dialogue between modellers. In this paper, we present the results of the first modelling challenge in animal health - the ASF Challenge - which focused on a synthetic epidemic of African swine fever (ASF) on an island. The modelling approaches proposed by five independent international teams were compared. We assessed their ability to predict temporal and spatial epidemic expansion at the interface between domestic pigs and wild boar, and to prioritise a limited number of alternative interventions. We also compared their qualitative and quantitative spatio-temporal predictions over the first two one-month projection phases of the challenge. Top-performing models in predicting the ASF epidemic differed according to the challenge phase, host species, and in predicting spatial or temporal dynamics. Ensemble models built using all team-predictions outperformed any individual model in at least one phase. The ASF Challenge demonstrated that accounting for the interface between livestock and wildlife is key to increasing our effectiveness in controlling emerging animal diseases, and contributed to improving the readiness of the scientific community to face future ASF epidemics. Finally, we discuss the lessons learnt from model comparison to guide decision making., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest The authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)