Search

Introduction: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-13 with high binding affinity and slow dissociation rate, prevents the formation of the interleukin-4Rα/interleukin-13Rα1 heterodimer receptor signaling complex. Here we report the impact of lebrikizumab on responses to two non-live vaccines in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: ADopt-VA (NCT04626297) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 16-week, phase 3 randomized study to assess the impact of lebrikizumab treatment on non-live vaccine immune responses, and efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab compared with placebo. Eligible patients included adults from 18 to 55 years of age with moderate-to-severe chronic AD who were randomly assigned 1:1 to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks or placebo and stratified according to disease severity. The primary endpoints were the development of a booster response to tetanus toxoid and a positive antibody response to meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV), 4 weeks after administration of the corresponding vaccine. Results: At week 16, 73.6% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 78/106) achieved Tdap booster response compared with 73.4% of patients in the placebo group (n = 58/79). MCV vaccine response was observed in 86.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 86/99) and 75.0% of patients in the placebo group (n = 60/80). At week 16, IGA 0,1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline was achieved by 40.6% (n = 51/125) of patients treated with lebrikizumab and 18.9% (n = 23/122) of patients who received placebo (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of patients achieving EASI 75 at week 16 in the lebrikizumab-treated patients (58.0%, n = 72/125) compared with placebo (32.7%, n = 40/122, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment with lebrikizumab did not impact response to non-live vaccines Tdap and MCV in this study. Lebrikizumab treatment had a significant degree of efficacy compared to placebo across multiple endpoints. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04626297. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The decision to initiate systemic therapy (ST) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex, with no criteria that are globally agreed upon. To aid dermatology providers in this decision-making, the "When to Start Systemic Therapy Checklist" was developed. The checklist comprises three components: (A) clinical severity, (B) subjective burden, and (C) lack of treatment response, each with several criteria. Systemic therapy is indicated when at least one criterion in each component is fulfilled. Objectives To corroborate the validity of this checklist, we evaluated the agreement between the decision to initiate ST using the checklist, against the reference, CorEvitas AD Registry patients prescribed a ST. Methods Adults with moderate-to-severe AD from the prospective, longitudinal CorEvitas AD registry were included in this descriptive analysis (July 2020 – August 2023). Patients were included if they were initiating ST at enrollment (ST group) or not initiating ST at enrollment (non-ST group) but had vIGA-AD® ≥3 and Eczema Area Severity Index ≥12. The checklist criteria were compared against registry outcome measures; when a criterion did not match a measure, either a proxy measure was selected or that part of the questionnaire was excluded. Overall percentage agreement (accord between checklist criteria and ST initiation status [reference standard]) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. Results In the ST group (n=1488), 97.0% of patients met at least one criterion from section A, 94.1% from section B, and 92.1% for either section A or B. In the non-ST group (n=208), 100% of patients met at least one criterion from section A, 92.3% from section B, and 92.3% from either section A or B. Among patients in the ST group who met at least one criterion each from section A and B, overall percentage agreement was 81.7% (95% CI: 79.8%, 83.5%). Section C, which addresses "lack of treatment response" could not be evaluated due to the absence of relevant data in the registry. Conclusions Nearly all patients initiating ST met at least one criterion from both section A and B of the "When to Start Systemic Therapy Checklist", demonstrating a strong alignment between the checklist sections A and B and disease burden of AD patients in the registry. Subsequent research is needed to assess section C due to registry limitations. Future analyses should examine why some patients with high disease burden and severity remain untreated with systemics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Historically, atopic dermatitis (AD) was believed to affect primarily children. However, a recent meta-analysis of 17 studies reporting age of AD onset as >16 years found that the pooled proportion of adult-onset AD was 26.1%, and that AD onset can occur at all ages. Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody which targets IL-13, the key cytokine implicated in AD. Objectives This analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adults ≥60 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods Data for patients aged ≥60 years from two Phase 3 trials, ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, were pooled. A total of 98 patients ≥ 60 years participated in the ADvocate trials (N=28 placebo (PBO), N=70 LEB). Patients were treated with lebrikizumab 250mg every 2 weeks or PBO, for 16 Weeks. Baseline demographics and characteristics were recorded. Efficacy was assessed in the pooled modified intent to treat population at Week 16 with Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75), EASI percentage change from baseline (CFB), and Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4-point improvement. Categorical outcomes were evaluated by Cochran Mantel Haenszel tests to compare treatment groups. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using the analysis of covariance model. Data collected after use of rescue medication or discontinuation due to lack of efficacy were imputed with non-responder imputation (NRI) for categorical endpoints, or baseline values for continuous endpoints. Data collected after discontinuation for other reasons were set to missing and missing data were imputed with multiple imputation. Safety was also assessed in the integrated modified safety population. Results The baseline mean age was 67.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.7, range 60-93) in LEB- treated patients and 69 years ([6.2], range 60-85) in PBO. The LEB-treated population was 62.9% male (n=44/70) vs PBO 46.4% (n=13/28). Race was comparable between groups. At baseline 67.1% LEB (n=47/70) and 57.1% PBO (n=16/28) patients had IGA 3, while 32.9% LEB (n=23/70) and 42.9% PBO (n=12/28) had IGA 4. Other baseline characteristics were comparable: EASI: LEB 26.1, [10.6] vs PBO 27.1, [8.1]; BSA: LEB 38.3, [19.8] vs. PBO 40.9, [18.1]; and Pruritus NRS: LEB 7.5, [2.0] vs PBO 7.4, [1.7]. At Week 16, IGA (0,1) was achieved by 34.5% LEB-treated patients vs 11% PBO (P=0.022). EASI 75 was achieved by 48.9% and 16.3% of LEB- and PBO-treated patients, respectively (P=0.004). Pruritus NRS with ≥4-point improvement was reported by 45.5% and 12.2% of LEB vs PBO, respectively (P=0.004). The mean percent CFB EASI was LEB -58.5% (SE 8.5) and PBO -29.4% (SE 11.1) (P=0.002). Safety results in the older adult population were consistent with the overall modified safety population. Conclusions At Week 16, efficacy and patient reported outcome endpoints were met in the older adult population. These results indicate that lebrikizumab is an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in the adult population ≥60 years of age and has a consistent safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients who completed the originating studies, BREEZE-AD1 (NCT03334396), BREEZE-AD2(NCT03334422), and BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301), were eligible for enrollment in the multicenter,phase-3, long-term extension study BREEZE-AD3 (NCT03334435). At week 52, responders and partial responders to baricitinib 4 mg were re-randomized (1:1) into the sub-study to dose continuation (4 mg, N = 84), or dose down-titration (2 mg, N = 84). Maintenance of response was assessed from week 52 to 104 of BREEZE-AD3. Physician-rated outcomes included vIGA-AD (0,1), EASI75, and mean change from baseline in EASI. Patient-reported outcomes included DLQI, P OEM total score, HADS, and from baseline: WPAI (presenteeism, absenteeism, overall work impairment, daily activity impairment) and change from baseline in SCORAD itch and sleep loss. With continuous treatment with baricitinib 4 mg, efficacy was maintained up to week 104 in vIGA-AD (0,1), EASI75, EASI mean change from baseline, SCORAD itch, SCORAD sleep loss, DLQI, P OEM, HADS, and WPAI (all scores). Patients down-titrated to 2 mg maintained most of their improvements in each of these measures. The sub-study of BREEZE AD3 supports flexibility in baricitinib dosing regimens. Patients who continued treatment with baricitinib 4 mg and down-titrated to 2 mg maintained improvements in skin, itch, sleep, and quality of life for up to 104 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To address the need for long‐term efficacy and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) data for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with baricitinib 2 mg, a study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD. Data presented here provided efficacy and outcomes data for patients treated for 52 weeks. Patients who participated in the originating study, BREEZE‐AD5 (NCT03435081), and met additional eligibility criteria could enroll in the multicenter, open‐label, Phase 3, long‐term extension study BREEZE‐AD6 (NCT03559270). Patients received baricitinib 2 mg for the duration of BREEZE‐AD6. In BREEZE‐AD6, the proportion of patients who achieved a 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) and validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA‐AD™) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) were assessed through 52 weeks, in addition to several PROs. At week 52, the proportion of patients treated with baricitinib 2 mg daily achieving EASI75 was 48.6% (70/144), and 31.3% (45/144) of patients achieved a vIGA‐AD score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). Improvements in PROs such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD, itch and sleep) scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score, and DLQI ≤5 response were observed, and these responses were sustained through 52 weeks. Long‐term efficacy of baricitinib in patients with AD was demonstrated by both clinician and patient‐reported outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose To address issues regarding health disparities and differential access to health care in diverse racial and ethnic populations, many of whom are part of underserved communities, current and robust data on atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence by race/ethnicity are needed. Whereas data on pediatric prevalence of atopic dermatitis in diverse race/ethnicity populations have been reported, there are limited epidemiologic data on adult populations with AD. Methods Analyses were conducted using cross-sectional data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Weighted overall frequencies of subject reports of diagnosed AD or eczema were estimated by race/ethnicity. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated to compare prevalence rates between subgroups. Corresponding population denominators for use in estimating prevalence rates were obtained from the US Census Bureau (2020 Census Demographic Profile). Prevalence is reported as percentage (standard error). Pediatric data was also analyzed for the presentation. Results Overall US prevalence of AD in adults ages 18-64 was 7.6% (0.2) and age 65+ was 6.1% (0.3), with a weighted US estimate of 15.3 and 3.2 million respectively. Race/ethnicity prevalence rates for all adults were Black/African American 8.5% (0.6), White 7.7% (0.2), Asian 6.5% (0.7), American Indian/Alaskan Native 4.9% (2.1), and Hispanic 4.8% (0.4). The odds ratio for Hispanic vs Non-Hispanic White was 0.6 (95%CI 0.5-0.7; p<0.0001). Conclusions Total US prevalence of AD in all adults is approximately 18 million. Hispanic adults have a lower prevalence AD than all other adult groups. Additional studies are needed to understand sociodemographic variations in AD prevalence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Real-world disease management of atopic dermatitis (AD) is hampered by a lack of consistency between providers that treat AD regarding assessment of severity, disease activity, and quality of life. Variability and inconsistency in documentation makes it difficult to understand the impact of AD. This study summarizes AD-related symptoms and concerns captured in unstructured qualitative provider notes by healthcare providers during visits with patients with AD. Methods: Provider notes were obtained for patients with AD (n = 133,025) from a USA-based ambulatory electronic health records system. The sample included both children (n = 69,551) and adults at least 18 years of age (n = 63,474) receiving treatment from a variety of specialties including primary care, dermatology, and allergy/immunology. Key skin-related words were identified from a review of a sample of notes and natural language processing (NLP) was applied to determine the frequency of the keywords and bigram patterns. Results: Provider notes largely focused on symptoms (primarily itch) and symptom relief rather than the impact of AD on work or lifestyle. Despite the known relationship between itch and skin pain, neuralgia was not widely documented. Compared to primary care providers, dermatologists' and allergist/immunologists' notes had more documentation of symptom-related issues. Personal and work/life burden issues were not widely documented regardless of specialty. Conclusion: The topics documented in case notes by healthcare providers about their patients with AD focus largely on symptoms and, to a lesser extent, treatment, but do not reflect the burden of AD on patients' lives. This finding highlights a potential care gap that warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risk of VTE among this population is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of VTE among adults with AD and compare the risk vs. matched non-AD controls. Methods: This retrospective study used claims data from the IBM Watson MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid databases to identify adults aged 18 years or older with AD. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 person-years (PY) of VTE were reported for three cohorts: overall AD, moderate-to-severe AD, and non-AD controls matched by age, sex, and calendar time to the overall cohort. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for VTE risk. Results: Overall, 198,685 patients with AD were identified. Crude VTE IRs were 0.24 for AD overall, 0.31 for moderate-to-severe AD, and 0.25 for non-AD controls. VTE risk was similar in patients with AD vs. non-AD controls (partially adjusted HR 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.09). VTE risk was greater in patients with moderate-to-severe AD vs. non-AD controls in partially adjusted models (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13, 1.36), but not after adjustment for healthcare use and VTE risk factors (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85, 1.07). Conclusions: AD was not an independent risk factor for VTE, and the risk of VTE among patients with AD was low. These findings provide valuable context for understanding VTE risk among patients with AD, which is particularly relevant as advanced therapies for the treatment of moderate to severe AD, such as janus kinase inhibitors, become available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]