Search

The importance of multidisciplinary long-term follow-up for adults born with esophageal atresia (EA) is increasingly recognized. Hence, a valid, condition-specific instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes imperative. This study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument for adults with EA. The Specific Quality of life in Esophageal atresia Adults (SQEA) questionnaire was developed through focus group-based item generation, pilot testing, item reduction and a multicenter, nationwide field test to evaluate the feasibility, reliability (internal and retest) and validity (structural, construct, criterion and convergent), in compliance with the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments guidelines. After pilot testing (n  = 42), items were reduced from 144 to 36 questions. After field testing (n  = 447), three items were discarded based on item-response theory results. The final SQEA questionnaire (33 items) forms a unidimensional scale generating an unweighted total score. Feasibility, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.94) and test–retest agreement (intra-class coefficient 0.92) were good. Construct validity was discriminative for esophageal replacement (P  < 0.001), dysphagia (P  < 0.001) and airway obstruction (P  = 0.029). Criterion validity showed a good correlation with dysphagia (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.736). SQEA scores correlated well with other validated disease-specific HRQoL scales such as the GIQLI and SGRQ, but poorly with the more generic RAND-36. Overall, this first condition-specific instrument for EA adults showed satisfactory feasibility, reliability and validity. Additionally, it shows discriminative ability to detect disease burden. Therefore, the SQEA questionnaire is both a valid instrument to assess the HRQoL in EA adults and an interesting signaling tool, enabling clinicians to recognize more severely affected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Endoscopic surveillance of adults with esophageal atresia is advocated, but the optimal surveillance strategy remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide recommendations on appropriate starting age and intervals of endoscopic surveillance in adults with esophageal atresia. Methods Participants underwent standardized upper endoscopies with biopsies. Surveillance intervals of 3–5 years were applied, depending on age and histopathological results. Patient's age and time to development of (pre)malignant lesions were calculated. Results A total of 271 patients with esophageal atresia (55% male; median age at baseline endoscopy 26.7 (range 15.6–68.5) years; colon interposition n  = 17) were included. Barrett's esophagus was found in 19 (7%) patients (median age 32.3 (17.8–56.0) years at diagnosis). Youngest patient with a clinically relevant Barrett's esophagus was 20.9 years. Follow-up endoscopies were performed in 108 patients (40%; median follow-up time 4.6 years). During surveillance, four patients developed Barrett's esophagus but no dysplasia or cancer was found. One 45-year-old woman with a colon interposition developed an adenoma with high-grade dysplasia which was radically removed. Two new cases of esophageal carcinoma were diagnosed in patients (55 and 66 years old) who were not under surveillance. One of them had been curatively treated for esophageal carcinoma 13 years ago. Conclusions This study shows that endoscopic screening of patients with esophageal atresia, including those with a colon interposition, can be started at 20 years of age. Up to the age of 40 years a surveillance interval of 10 years appeared to be safe. Endoscopic surveillance may also be warranted for patients after curative esophageal cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous research has shown that female adolescents and adults report lower health status than their male peers. Possibly, this discrepancy already develops during childhood. We collected sex-specific data with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) in a large school-based sample.Methods: The online version of the PedsQL was administered to healthy Dutch children aged 5-7 years (parent proxy-report), 8-12 years (parent proxy-report and child self-report), and 13-17 years (parent proxy-report and child self-report), recruited through regular primary and secondary schools. Sex differences were assessed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and intraclass correlation coefficients served to compare parent proxy-reports with child self-reports. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations of sex of the child, age, and parental educational level with PedsQL scores.Results: Eight hundred eighty-two parents and five hundred eighty one children were recruited from 15 different schools in the Netherlands. Parents of 8-to-12-year-olds reported higher scores on School Functioning for girls than for boys (mean difference [MD]: 6.56, p < 0.001). Parents of 13-to-17-year-olds reported lower scores on Physical and Emotional Functioning for girls than for boys (MDs: 2.14 and 5.79, p = 0.014 and p < 0.001, respectively). Girls aged 8-12 years reported lower scores than boys in this age group on Physical Functioning (MD: 3.09, p = 0.005). Girls aged 13-17 years reported lower scores than boys in this age group on Physical Functioning (MD: 3.67, p < 0.001), Emotional Functioning (MD: 8.11, p < 0.001), and the Total Score (MD 3.26, p = 0.004). No sex differences were found in children aged 5-7 years. Agreement between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports was poor to moderate.Conclusions: Girls generally had lower PedsQL scores than boys, both in parent proxy-reports and in child self-reports. We recommend to apply sex-specific data when assessing health status using the PedsQL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]