1. Evaluation of the Processes and Outcomes of a Physician Leadership Program: The Continuous Feedback Loop Design.
- Author
-
Gascon, Gregg M., Chen, Huey T., Morosanu, Liliana, Chen, Victor H., Cass, Phil, and Falcone, Robert
- Subjects
- *
EDUCATION of physicians , *MINDFULNESS , *STATISTICAL power analysis , *EVALUATION of human services programs , *LEADERSHIP , *STAKEHOLDER analysis , *PROFESSIONAL employee training , *CURRICULUM , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *PRE-tests & post-tests , *HUMAN services programs , *COMMUNICATION , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *PROFESSIONAL associations , *EDUCATIONAL outcomes , *ADULT education workshops - Abstract
Introduction: Physicians assume leadership roles in their health care organizations and practices often without support or training. The Physicians Leadership Academy provides integrated leadership seminars, mindfulness training, and executive coaching in a 10-month curriculum to physicians across area organizations. Methods: Program evaluators responded to stakeholders' need for continuous program improvement by developing a continuous feedback loop evaluation design incorporating a program monitoring system and a theory-driven program evaluation. Given the size of the 2019 to 20 cohort (n = 19), a one-group pretest/posttest design was used to assess the mechanisms of the program (mindfulness and wellbeing) along with knowledge development, emotional intelligence, and personal and professional growth. The assessments used a combination of published and administrator-developed assessments to address the unique aspects of the program. Doing such ensured continuous improvement and sustainability for the program. Results: The cohort of physicians demonstrated significant engagement and learning across the curriculum, improved mindfulness, and improved capacity of the providers to affect their health care system and communities. Conclusions: The utility of the program was demonstrated through quantitative and qualitative analyses. Implications of the methodology for future evaluations of program developments are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF