Search

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Objective: The purpose of this study is to quantify the extent of change in sway associated with maintaining a balanced posture within the cone of economy (CoE), in a group of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients' pre and postsurgery and compare them to matched non-scoliotic controls.Summary Of Background Data: Patients with spinal deformities adopt a variety of postural changes in the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities in their effort to compensate for the anterior shift in the gravity line. ADS patients are known to exhibit an increased sway within their CoE. Greater sway expends more energy while standing when compared with healthy controls. Spinal alignment surgery has been shown to improve sagittal vertical axis and balance.Methods: Thirty-three ADS patients and performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery along with 20 non-scoliotic control.Results: ADS patients demonstrated more initial CoM (P = 0.001) and head (P = 0.011) displacements. Postoperatively ADS patients exhibited less CoM sway (P = 0.043) and head sway (P = 0.050), in comparison to their presurgery measures. Postsurgical ADS patients demonstrated more CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.012) displacements and increased muscle activity in comparison to non-scoliotic controls.Conclusion: Surgical alignment reduced the amount of sway, reduced the center of mass displacement, and reduced spine and lower extremity energy expenditure in ADS' patients. In symptomatic preoperative ADS patients, sagittal sway increased along with greater lumbar spine and lower extremity neuromuscular activity in comparison to a non-scoliotic control. Although surgical alignment improved ADS functional parameters during a dynamic balance test, these parameters approached but did not fully achieve non-scoliotic control parameters when measured 3 months after surgery.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: To examine the relationship of fear-avoidance beliefs and neuromuscular activity during gait in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients.Summary Of Background Data: Among patients with chronic spine pain, fear-avoidance beliefs are predictive of poor surgical outcomes. Fear-avoi occurs when patients perceive that movement will worsen underlying physical problems. This process leads them to restrict activity, which further heightens emotional distress. Patients with ADS have previously been shown to have an altered gait pattern. Electromyography is evolving into a useful tool to further our understanding of the pathologic manifestations of ADS during gait.Methods: Fifty ADS patients completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaire and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Surface electromyography electrodes were bilaterally placed on trunk and lower extremity muscles. Each patient performed a series of over-ground gait trials at a self-selected comfortable speed. Pearson Product Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the self-reported fear of movement measures and the neuromuscular gait analysis biomechanical data.Results: The TSK total score and the FABQ physical were correlated with muscle onset of the External Oblique (P = 0.005), Gluteus Maximus (P = 0.018), Multifidi (P = 0.017), Erector Spinae (P = 0.014), Rectus Femoris (i = 0.008), Semitendinosus (P = 0.012), Tibilais Anterior (P = 0.012), and Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.010). Furthermore, the TSK total score, FABQ physical portion were correlated with muscle peak activity of Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.007), Multifidi (P = 0.014), and Tibilais Anterior (i = 0.050) and time to peak muscle activity of the Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.006) and Semitendinosus P = 0.038.Conclusion: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between neuromuscular gait parameters and fear-avoidance of movement which may reflect ADS patient experiences during ambulation. Further, it demonstrates that there are different aspects of fear-avoidance that may influence gait parameters. This study extends previous research on the role of fear-avoidance to include patients with spinal deformity.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: The current study utilized quantitative gait analysis to examine the relationship of fear-avoidance beliefs to gait patterns in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).Summary Of Background Data: Among patients with chronic spine pain, fear-avoidance beliefs are predictive of behavioral deficiencies, poor work, and surgery outcomes. The impact of such beliefs on patients with major spinal deformity has yet to be investigated. Patients with ADS have previously been shown to have an altered gait pattern. Utilizing quantified gait analysis, this study aims to examine correlations between fear-avoidance and various aspects of gait in patients with ADS.Methods: Twenty-five ADS patients completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaire and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Each patient performed a series of overground gait trials at a self-selected comfortable speed. Pearson product correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the self-reported fear of movement measures and the objective gait analysis biomechanical data.Results: TSK score correlated strongly with gait speed, stride, step, double support times, and step length, and correlated moderately with cadence, and stride length. The FABQ physical portion strongly correlated with stride length and step length. The FABQ physical portion was moderately correlated with gait speed and single support time. The FABQ work portion was correlated with stride length and step length.Conclusion: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between biomechanical gait parameters, as measured with gait analysis, and fear-avoidance of movement, as measured with the TSK and FABQ. Further, it demonstrates that quantified gait analysis can be a useful tool to evaluate patients with spine deformity and to assess the outcomes of treatments in this group of patients. This study extends previous research on the role of fear-avoidance to include patients with spinal deformity.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]