Search

Lanabecestat (AZD3293; LY3314814) is an orally active potent inhibitor of human β-secretase 1 in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. In this first Japanese clinical study for an Alzheimer disease intervention to include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling in Japanese elderly healthy subjects, we report the pharmacokinetics and effects on plasma and CSF amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides of lanabecestat in a phase 1 study involving 40 healthy Japanese subjects (NCT02005211). No safety and tolerability concerns were identified in healthy Japanese subjects exposed to lanabecestat up to the highest doses given, which is consistent with observations in a US phase 1 study of lanabecestat. Exposure to lanabecestat was similar for young and elderly subjects and increased in a dose-dependent manner. For elderly subjects, plasma lanabecestat half-life after multiple dosing was 12 to 17 hours (on days 10 and 14). Robust plasma and CSF Aβ peptide reductions were also seen at all doses, with CSF Aβ

The relative bioavailability of lanabecestat administered as 2 tablet formulations versus an oral solution was investigated. This phase 1 single‐center, open‐label, randomized, 3‐period crossover study involved healthy male and nonfertile female subjects aged 18–55 years (NCT02039180). Subjects received a single 50‐mg lanabecestat dose as solution, tablet A, or tablet B on day 1 of each crossover period; 14 of 16 subjects completed the study. Relative bioavailability based on plasma lanabecestat AUC0–∞ (area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve from zero to infinity) geometric mean ratio versus oral solution (primary variable) was: tablet A, 1.052 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.001–1.106); tablet B, 1.040 (0.989–1.093). These 90%CIs for geometric mean ratios are within accepted standard bioequivalence boundaries for all other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for both lanabecestat and metabolite (AZ13569724). All 3 formulations had similar plasma lanabecestat concentration–time profiles. Six adverse events were reported by 6 subjects (37.5%, all mild). GastroPlus modeling predicted a negligible impact of gastric pH changes on systemic PK (up to pH 7.4). Both tablet formulations fall within standard accepted bioequivalence criteria versus the oral solution. A single 50‐mg lanabecestat dose was well tolerated as a solution or tablet formulation in this population.

AZD3293 (LY3314814) is a promising new potentially disease-modifying BACE1 (β-secretase) inhibitor in Phase III clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Reported here are the first two Phase I studies: (1) a single ascending dose study evaluating doses of 1-750 mg with a food-effect component (n = 72), and (2) a 2-week multiple ascending dose study evaluating doses of 15 or 50 mg once daily (QD) or 70 mg once weekly (QW) in elderly subjects (Part 1, n = 31), and 15, 50, or 150 mg QD in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Part 2, n = 16). AZD3293 was generally well tolerated up to the highest doses given. No notable food effects were observed. PK following multiple doses (Part 2) were tmax of 1 to 3 h and mean t1/2 of 16 to 21 h across the 15 to 150 mg dose range. For single doses of ≥5 mg, a ≥70% reduction was observed in mean plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations, with prolonged suppression for up to 3 weeks at the highest dose level studied. Following multiple doses, robust reductions in plasma (≥64% at 15 mg and ≥78% at ≥50 mg) and cerebrospinal fluid (≥51% at 15 mg and ≥76% at ≥50 mg) Aβ peptides were seen, including prolonged suppression even with a QW dosing regimen. AZD3293 is the only BACE1 inhibitor for which prolonged suppression of plasma Aβ with a QW dosing schedule has been reported. Two Phase III studies of AZD3293 (AMARANTH, NCT02245737; and DAYBREAK-ALZ, NCT02783573) are now ongoing.

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common and often a treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) of opioid therapy for chronic pain. Naloxegol (previously NKTR-118), a PEGylated derivative of naloxone that has minimal penetration of the central nervous system, has received regulatory approval as an oral therapy for OIC. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalation study was performed to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of naloxegol in healthy volunteers. Four cohorts, each with 4 male and 4 female volunteers, were randomized 3:1 to a twice-daily naloxegol solution (25, 60, 125, and 250 mg) or matching placebo solution. Doses were given every 12 hours for 7 days, with a single final dose on the morning of day 8. All 32 subjects completed the study. The incidence of most AEs was similar in the naloxegol and placebo groups; no AE led to study discontinuation. Naloxegol was rapidly absorbed. Plasma naloxegol pharmacokinetics showed dose proportionality, negligible accumulation at steady state, and no sex differences. Naloxegol in doses up to 250 mg every 12 hours was generally safe and well tolerated in this healthy volunteer population.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose, crossover study evaluated single oral doses of naloxegol (NKTR-118; 8, 15, 30, 60, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 mg), a PEGylated derivative of naloxone, for safety and tolerability, antagonism of peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) effects of intravenous morphine, and pharmacokinetics. Healthy men were randomized 1:1 to naloxegol or naloxegol-matching placebo administered with morphine and lactulose in a 2-period crossover design. Periods were separated by a 5- to 7-day washout. Assessments included safety, tolerability, orocecal transit time (OCTT), pupillary miosis, and pharmacokinetics. The study was completed by 46 subjects. The most common adverse events were somnolence, dizziness, headache, and nausea. Greater reversal of morphine-induced delay in OCTT occurred with increasing naloxegol dose, demonstrating dose-ordered antagonism of morphine's peripheral gastrointestinal effects. Forty-four subjects showed no reversal of pupillary miosis; 2 showed potential partial reversal at 250 and 1000 mg, indicating negligible antagonism of morphine's CNS effects at doses ≤ 125 mg. Rapid absorption, linear pharmacokinetics up to 1000 mg, and low to moderate between-subject pharmacokinetic variability was observed. The pharmacokinetics of morphine or its glucuronide metabolites were unaltered by concurrent naloxegol administration. Naloxegol was generally safe and well tolerated at single doses up to 1000 mg.

We report on the investigation of a Salmonella enteritidis outbreak in hospitals and nursing homes in the district Oberallgaeu, Bavaria, in July 2004. Affected by this outbreak were hospital patients, inhabitants of nursing homes, kitchen coworkers and maintenance personnel. Within this outbreak six deaths were observed. A forensic medical investigation of four deaths revealed two cases of Salmonella enteritis as the primary cause of death, another cause of death was due to other causes and one cause of death remained unclear. The microbiological investigation of stool samples linked all positive samples to an outbreak during this period. The epidemiological outbreak curve pointed towards a foodborne transmission of the pathogen. The infection period could be limited to the weekend of the 3./4.7.2004. All affected institutions were supplied by a catering service with several sites. All tested food samples were negative for Salmonella enteritis. Epidemiological investigations revealed that a contaminated pudding was probably responsible for the outbreak.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two pregabalin regimens administered as adjunctive therapy to that of placebo in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was performed. Following a prospective 8-week baseline phase, patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo or pregabalin 600 mg/day administered twice daily (BID) or three times daily (TID). Primary efficacy was measured as change in seizure frequency from baseline of either pregabalin regimen compared with placebo. Secondary efficacy comparisons included the proportion of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responder rate) and median percentage change from baseline in seizure frequency. Safety/tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and clinical laboratory evaluation. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: Pregabalin treatment resulted in seizure frequency reductions: 53% for pregabalin TID ( p ≤ 0.0001) and 44% for pregabalin BID ( p ≤ 0.0001) compared with a 1% increase for placebo. Responder rates were 49% for pregabalin TID and 43% for pregabalin BID compared with 9% for placebo ( p ≤ 0.001). Both pregabalin regimens were similar in efficacy and tolerability. The most common AEs were dizziness, somnolence, and ataxia. Conclusions: Pregabalin administered at 600 mg/day is safe, generally well tolerated, and efficacious as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of patients with partial seizures, with or without secondary generalizations. This dose can be administered on a twice daily or three times daily schedule with similar efficacy and tolerability results.

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate pregabalin (PGB), 150 mg/day, and PGB, 600 mg/day, as an add-on treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures concurrently treated with one to three anticonvulsants (AEDs). Methods: An international (13 countries), multicenter (45 centers), 12-week, double-blind, randomized study in which patients with partial seizures received placebo (n = 96); PGB, 150 mg/day (n = 99); or PGB, 600 mg/day (n = 92); given 3 times a day (t.i.d.). The primary efficacy criterion was reduction in seizure frequency during treatment as compared with baseline, as measured by RRatio, the symmetrical percentage change in seizure rates determined from daily seizure diaries. The RRatio between the 8-week baseline (pretreatment phase) and the 12-week treatment period were compared between each of the PGB groups and the placebo group by using an analysis of variance analysis of the intent-to-treat population. Results: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, were both significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the RRatio [–11.5 (p = 0.0007) and –31.4 (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, vs. 0.9]. These RRatio values correspond to seizure-frequency reductions from baseline of –1.8, 20.6, and 47.8% for placebo, 150 mg/day, and 600 mg/day, respectively. PGB efficacy was significantly dose related (p ≤ 0.0001). Secondary efficacy variables corroborated the findings of the primary analysis. Significantly more patients were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the PGB, 600 mg/day (43.5%), group than in the placebo group (6.2%) (p ≤ 0.001). PGB was well tolerated. Dose-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%), mostly mild or moderate in intensity, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and weight gain. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 10% of patients at 150 mg/day and 18.5% of patients at 600 mg/day, compared with 6.2% of patients receiving placebo. Conclusions: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, is highly effective and well-tolerated add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures.

Background: Pregabalin is an α2-δ ligand that has anxiolytic, analgesic, and anticonvulsant properties. Objective: To establish the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin administered twice-daily (BID) without dose titration as adjunctive treatment in patients with partial seizures and to confirm the dose-response relationship. Methods: This 76-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of an 8-week baseline and a 12-week double-blind phase. Patients with refractory partial seizures on one to three antiepileptic drugs were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups (placebo or 50, 150, 300, and 600 mg/d pregabalin, all administered BID). Efficacy was assessed using seizure frequency reduction and responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction from baseline). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Results: A total of 453 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median baseline seizure rate was 10 per month. Seizure frequency reductions from baseline were 7% (placebo; n = 100), 12% (50 mg/d; n = 88), 34% (150 mg/d; n = 86), 44% (300 mg/d; n = 90), and 54% (600 mg/d; n = 89). Responder rates (≥50% seizure reduction) were 14% (placebo), 15% (50 mg/d), 31% (150 mg/d), 40% (300 mg/d), and 51% (600 mg/d). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5% (placebo), 7% (50 mg/d), 1% (150 mg/d), 14% (300 mg/d), and 24% (600 mg/d). The 150-, 300-, and 600-mg/d pregabalin groups were associated with greater reductions in seizures (p ≤ 0.0001) and greater responder rates compared with the placebo group (p ≤ 0.006). There was a favorable dose-response trend for both seizure reductions (p ≤ 0.0001) and responder rate (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Adjunctive therapy with pregabalin 150, 300, and 600 mg/d, given in twice-daily doses without titration, is significantly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with partial seizures as demonstrated in patients with refractory partial seizures.

Endometrial polyps (EPs) are among the common cases of abnormal uterine bleeding. Hormonal factors may be involved in the pathogenesis as indicated by endometrial abnormalities in patients treated with tamoxifen. This study was designed to analyse the patient characteristics which may be associated with polyp occurrence and assess the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Group of 245 patients was formed to 152 postmenopausal and 93 premenopausal women with EP diagnosed hysteroscopically and confirmed histologically. Evaluated factors were as follows: 1) patient characteristics: age, body mass, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, nulliparity, late menopause, estrogen replacement therapy, and tamoxifen treatment; 2) clinical features of EPs, and 3) the number of curettage's (DC) and hysteroscopies.Hypertension associated with obesity appears to be an important factor in combination which may play role in the pathogenesis of EPs like the late menopause which was noted in 30% of examined postmenopausal women. An association between EPs and tamoxifen was found in 8% patients with breast cancer. 2. Postmenopausal uterine bleeding and menstrual disorders were prominent clinical symptoms in 44% post- and in 82% of premenopausal women. The other 56% post- and 18% premenopausal patients were asymptomatic. 3. The multiple EPs were present in 26% of postmenopausal and in 15% premenopausal women. 4. Transvaginal ultrasonography supplemented by sonohysterography in cases with abnormal ultrasonographic findings should be the main diagnostic method. 5 Hysteroscopical polypectomy is regarded as the optimal therapy and the removal of the endometrial basalis in the EP origin area prevents persistence or recurrence of EP.

Fosphenytoin, a prodrug of phenytoin, is rapidly and completely converted to phenytoin in adults after intravenous or intramuscular administration and is significantly better tolerated than parenteral phenytoin. Fosphenytoin is highly plasma-protein bound and, when present in sufficient concentration, will displace phenytoin from plasma proteins. The clinical utility is that fosphenytoin may be used to achieve therapeutic phenytoin concentrations more rapidly than intravenous phenytoin infused at its maximum recommended rate. In a clinical study of generalized convulsive status epilepticus, fosphenytoin, with or without benzodiazepine pretreatment, controlled seizures in 76 (93.8%) of 81 patients. In other studies, fosphenytoin maintained seizure control when substituted for oral phenytoin and for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgery and trauma patients. Adverse events associated with fosphenytoin generally were related to the central nervous system and were similar to those associated with phenytoin, except for a higher incidence of transient pruritus with fosphenytoin. Intravenous fosphenytoin has significant advantages over intravenous phenytoin: It requires a shorter infusion time and fewer intravenous disruptions, causes less pain and burning at the infusion site and minimal consequences in case of intravenous infiltration, allows longer maintenance of intravenous sites, and has better intravenous fluid compatibility and stability. In contrast to intramuscular phenytoin, intramuscular fosphenytoin is well tolerated in both large loading doses and maintenance doses. (J Child Neurol 1998;13(Suppl 1):S15-S18).

Using a report system of the Bavarian Public Health services 300 EHEC infections were registered within one year (Apr 1, 1996, to Mar 31, 1997) in Bavaria. These consisted of 22 cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) (mean age, 2.8 yr), 6 cases of incomplete HUS (1.3 yr), 188 cases of enteritis (3.3 yr) and 84 asymptomatic infections (12.9 yr), respectively. From this follows an incidence rate for all infections of approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants and for HUS in the age group of children and juveniles up to 18 years of approximately 0.8, respectively. Possible sources (paths) of infection registered in relevant frequencies were: raw milk consumption (18% of the infected), farm-animal associated contact (43%), and contact with patients suffering from diarrhoea (36%).

The results of past research have identified changes in brain structure in anorexia nervosa. We observed previously unreported MRI alterations in two cases of anorexia nervosa.For both cases, we reviewed the clinical history, MRI scans and conducted a pertinent literature review.The MRI brain scans of two patients with the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa revealed evidence of subcortical hyperintense changes on T2-weighted images.No previous reports of these findings have been described in the literature on anorexia nervosa to date. Clinical and pathologic correlates associated with these brain observations in anorexia nervosa are discussed.

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of fosphenytoin, a water-soluble phenytoin prodrug, after intramuscular and intravenous administration.Open-label study of intramuscular administration, and double-blind, randomized study of intravenous administration.Six and ten hospitals throughout the United States for the intramuscular and intravenous multicenter studies, respectively.Neurosurgical patients who required anticonvulsant prophylaxis or treatment.In the intramuscular study, 118 patients received loading doses ranging from 480-1500 mg phenytoin equivalents (PE) and daily maintenance doses ranging from 130-1250 mg PE for 3-14 days. In the intravenous study, 88 patients received fosphenytoin and 28 received phenytoin sodium for 3-14 days. Mean +/- SD loading doses and maintenance doses of intravenous fosphenytoin and phenytoin were 1082 +/- 299 mg PE and 411 +/- 221 mg PE, and 1082 +/- 299 mg and 422 +/- 197 mg, respectively. Trough phenytoin concentrations were measured daily in all patients.Intramuscular fosphenytoin was safe and well tolerated, with no irritation found for 99% of all injection site evaluations. Adverse events associated with the drug occurred in 9% of patients, commonly those typical of the parent drug. For intravenous treatment, the frequency of mild irritation at the infusion site was significantly lower in the fosphenytoin group (6%) than in the phenytoin group (25%, p0.05). Reductions in infusion rates were required in 17% and 36% of fosphenytoin and phenytoin recipients, respectively. No significant difference was observed relative to adverse events or seizure frequency between the groups. Trough plasma phenytoin concentrations were approximately 10 micrograms/ml or greater in patients receiving at least 3 days of intramuscular and intravenous fosphenytoin. Trough phenytoin concentrations were similar between patients receiving intravenous phenytoin and fosphenytoin on all study days.Fosphenytoin can be administered intramuscularly and intravenously in neurosurgical patients to achieve and maintain therapeutic phenytoin concentrations for up to 14 days. Both routes are safe and well tolerated. Intravenous fosphenytoin is significantly better tolerated than intravenous phenytoin sodium in this patient subset.

The method of quantitative assessment of the dynamics of compensation of peripheral equilibrium disturbances was applied in patients with sudden permanent unilateral loss of vestibular function of different aetiology. The course of compensation was assessed by means of the test of threshold excitability during rotation for establishing the threshold of practical compensation. It was found that the rate of the compensation process was influenced by: 1) greater adaptation of the central nervous system in young subjects, 2) earlier beginning of exercises. The clinical importance of early detection of the threshold of practical compensation and its significance for expert opinion are discussed.