1. Factors associated with nonadherence to instructions for using the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring
- Author
-
Ruth Merkatz, Marlena Gehret Plagianos, Bianca M. Stifani, and Carolina Sales Vieira
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Internationality ,Ethinyl Estradiol ,Logistic regression ,Article ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pregnant During the Study ,Contraceptive Agents, Female ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,ESTRADIOL ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Contraceptive Devices, Female ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Odds ratio ,Vaginal ring ,Confidence interval ,Sexual intercourse ,Regimen ,Logistic Models ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Reproductive Medicine ,Multivariate Analysis ,Vagina ,Patient Compliance ,Female ,Factor Analysis, Statistical ,business ,Norprogesterones - Abstract
Objectives We sought to identify factors associated with nonadherence to instructions for using a novel contraceptive providing 1 year of protection. Study design Data from a multicountry Phase 3 trial of the Nestorone® (segesterone acetate)/ethinyl estradiol (NES/EE) contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) were analyzed. Participants were instructed to use the CVR over 13 cycles and follow a 21/7 regimen. Their reports of CVR removals >2 h outside scheduled removal periods served as a proxy for nonadherence. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine factors associated with such use. Results Of 905 participants, 120 (13%) reported CVR removals >2 h. Removals for washing [odds ratio (OR) 3.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50–6.27] or sexual intercourse (OR 3.19, 95% CI 2.03–4.99), and finding CVR insertion difficult (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.36–5.80) were factors associated with removals >2 h. Lower educational attainment also predicted ring removal >2 h (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.55–6.75). Women residing in Europe or Australia were less likely to remove the ring for >2 h compared with women in the United States (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24–0.83 and OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.98, respectively). Participants who reported removals >2 h were more likely to discontinue CVR use (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24–2.95), report dissatisfaction (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.32–3.69) and become pregnant during the study (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.58–10.50). Conclusions Removing the CVR for washing and removing it before intercourse are factors associated with nonadherence to ring use. These are important topics for counseling women who are considering or using vaginal rings, including the NES/EE CVR. Implications Findings from this study may be useful in guiding counseling for current and prospective vaginal ring users. Anticipatory guidance should focus on how the ring feels in the vagina and during sex. Asking about ring removals may help identify women who are at increased risk for having an unplanned pregnancy.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF