Search

Over 100 patients have been treated for partial epilepsy using a NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis System (NCP). The NCP System is comprised of an implantable pulse generator, an implantable bipolar stimulating lead, and an external communication system. The lead delivers electrical impulses from the NCP Generator to the vagus nerve, and includes a connector end that plugs into the generator, a silicone insulated lead body, and the helical electrode array that attaches to the nerve. The surgical implantation technique has a significant impact on lead reliability and performance. The lead electrode has performed well to date. Modifications to further improve reliability have been implemented. Clinical experience, case history examples, and voltage measurements are examined. The lead electrode is an important component of the overall system and plays a significant part in the success of vagus nerve stimulation therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy has been studied in medically refractory patients with partial seizures in a randomized, blinded, parallel study. After a 3-month baseline period, the patients were implanted with the Neurocybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) system consisting of the NCP Generator and the Bipolar Vagal Stimulation Lead. Two stimulation paradigms were used, HIGH, which delivers what is considered to be optimal stimulation parameters and LOW, which is considered to be less or noneffective. The system and vagus nerve stimulation were well tolerated and few adverse events have been attributed to either. One patient experienced a period of direct current to the nerve due to a generator malfunction. This resulted in paralysis of the left vocal cord. Efficacy analysis on the first 37 patients to complete the controlled portion of the study has shown that the patients in the HIGH group experienced a mean reduction in seizure frequency of 33.3% and patients in the LOW group experienced a mean reduction in seizure frequency of 8.4%. The difference between the groups is statistically significant with a P value of 0.025. Analysis of seizure duration and intensity does not show any significant change. Ratings of the patient's overall condition fay the patient, investigator, and companion as a measurement of “quality of life” also show improvement in the HIGH group. The results of this interim study demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation is a safe and effective method of treating partial epileptic seizures.

Chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) continues to be evaluated as an adjunctive treatment for medically intractable seizures. A previous randomized controlled trial of 114 patients demonstrated a significant decrease in seizure frequency during 3 months of VNS at effective stimulation levels.To evaluate the efficacy of 1 year of VNS therapy for the treatment of medically refractory partial seizures and the relationship between initial and long-term response.All patients exiting the randomized controlled study of VNS for treatment of medically refractory partial seizures were offered indefinite treatment extension as part of an open-label trial. One hundred (88%) of 114 patients completed 12 months of VNS treatment at effective stimulation levels. Fourteen patients discontinued VNS treatment prior to 1 year, principally because of the treatment's lack of efficacy. These 14 patients were retained in the present analysis using an intent-to-treat approach. Antiepileptic drug use was monitored throughout the trial. Seizure frequency was analyzed in 4 sequential 3-month treatment periods.Compared with pretreatment baseline, there was a significant decrease in seizure frequency during each of the 3-month treatment periods. Seizure frequency was reduced by a median of 20% during the first 3 months of VNS treatment and by 32% during stimulation months 10 through 12. Response during the first 3 months of VNS treatment was a statistically significant predictor of response at months 10 through 12. The observed reduction in seizure frequency was not explained by overall changes in antiepileptic drug use.The results indicate that VNS remains an effective adjunctive therapy for medically refractory partial seizures over a period of at least 1 year. Response during the first 3 months of treatment is predictive of long-term response.

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is a new method for the treatment of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Sixteen patients, ten of whom participated in a larger multicenter double-blind trial on the efficacy of VNS in epilepsy, and six who participated in pilot studies, consented to participate in the present study. Ten patients received HIGH stimulation and six patients LOW stimulation for the 3-month trial. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples (16 ml) were collected both before and after 3 months of VNS. Amino acid and neurotransmitter metabolites were analyzed. Four patients responded to VS with more than a 25% seizure reduction after 3 months. Mean and median concentrations of phosphoethanolamine (PEA) increased in responders and decreased in nonresponders. Free GABA increased in both groups but more so in the nonresponders. After 9 months of VS (6-9 months on HIGH stimulation) 4 of 15 patients had more than 40% seizure reduction. There were significant correlations between seizure reduction and increases in asparagine, phenylalanine, PEA, alanine and tryptophan concentrations. Comparison between patients with HIGH or LOW stimulation showed a significant increase in ethanolamine (EA) in the HIGH group and a decrease in glutamine in the LOW group. All patients regardless of response or stimulation intensity showed significantly increased total and free GABA levels. A decrease in CSF aspartate was marginally significant. Other trends were decreases in glutamate and increases in 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid. Chronic VNS appears to have an effect on various amino acids pools in the brain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) significantly reduces the frequency of partial seizures in refractory epilepsy patients. We examined the serious adverse events, side effects, and tolerability as they relate to the surgical implant procedure and the stimulating device. We also reviewed potential drug interactions, device output complications, and impact of the therapy on overall health status. We analyzed the first 67 patients to exist the acute phase of the EO3 VNS trial comparing high (therapeutic) VNS to low (less or noneffective) VNS. Data were collected from case report forms used at each of the four visits during the 12-week baseline and at each of the four visits during the 14-week randomized phase of the trial. No significant complications were reported as a result of the implant procedure. Serious adverse events included 1 patient who experienced direct current to the vagus nerve owing to generator malfunction resulting in left vocal cord paralysis and withdrawal of the patient from the study. No clinically significant effects on vital signs, cardiac function, or gastric function were detected. Side effects associated with VNS in the high group were hoarseness (35.5%), coughing (13.9%), and throat pain (12.9%). In the low group, only hoarseness (13.9%) and throat pain (13.9%) were associated with VNS. These effects generally wrre not considered clinically significant and occurred primarily during the stimulation pulses. No patients discontinued VNS therapy during the acute phase because of side effects associated with normal stimulation. Except for the one instance of a short circuit in the system resulting in a direct current, stimulating system complications were minor, limited to programming, unscheduled stimulation, and high lead impedance. Patients, investigators, and patient companions rated patients receiving high stimulation as more "improved" than those receiving low stimulation in regards to overall health status. Antiepileptic drug (AED) plasma concentrations were not affected by VNS. The implant procedure, stimulating system, and therapy proved safe and tolerable during the study. The high percentage (67 of 68) of patients completing the study reflects patient acceptance and tolerability of this mode of therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was shown to reduce seizure frequency in refractory epilepsy patients in two pilot studies. Based on these results, a multicenter, prospectively randomized, parallel, double-blind study of patients with refractory partial seizures was initiated. After a 12-week baseline period, identical vagus nerve stimulators were implanted and patients randomized to either a high or low 14-week VNS treatment paradigm. The primary objective was to demonstrate that high VNS (therapeutic parameters) was more effective in reducing partial seizure frequency than was low VNS (less or noneffective parameters). Patients continued receiving antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with plasma concentrations held constant throughout the study. We report results of the first 67 patients to exit the 14-week acute phase. After 14 weeks of VNS, 31 patients receiving high VNS experienced a mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 30.9%, which was statistically significant as compared with the mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 11.3% in 36 patients receiving low VNS (p = 0.029, t test; p = 0.036, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). In addition to the significant intragroup p-values, mean seizure frequency percentage change reached statistical significance for high VNS (p0.001) but not low VNS (p = 0.072) as compared with baseline. Twelve of 31 (38.7%) patients receiving high VNS achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency whereas 7 of 36 (19.4%) patients receiving low VNS experienced at least 50% reduction after 14 weeks. The implant procedure and VNS therapy were well tolerated. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of VNS as treatment for epilepsy patients with refractory partial seizures.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has demonstrated a significant anticonvulsant effect in preclinical studies, in pilot studies in humans, and in the acute phase of a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study. After completion of a 14-week, blinded, randomized study, with 31 receiving high (therapeutic) VNS and 36 receiving low (less or noneffective) VNS, 67 patients elected to continue in an open extension phase. During the extension phase, all 67 patients received high VNS. Seizure frequency during the 3-month treatment blocks was compared with a 12-week baseline. For both groups, all periods of high VNS demonstrated a significant decrease in seizure frequency (p0.01 level) as compared with baseline. For the 16-18-month period of VNS, data were available for 26 of the 31 patients randomized to high VNS. This group achieved a 52.0% mean seizure frequency percentage reduction as compared with baseline. For those converted from low to high VNS, data were available for 24 of the 36 patients at the 16-18-month time period. This group reported a mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 38.1% as compared with baseline. No significant change in the safety/side effect profile was reported during long-term follow-up. The previously reported side effects of hoarseness/voice change, coughing, and paresthesia (sensation in neck and jaw) continued to occur during VNS. These side effects were well tolerated. During the follow-up period, 1 patient died of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and 5 patients discontinued treatment because of unsatisfactory efficacy.

We treated 14 patients with medically refractory partial seizures by stimulation of the vagus nerve in two single-blind pilot studies. Patients received stimulation through an implantable, programmable Neurocybernetic Prosthesis, consisting of a pulse generator and a lead-electrode assembly. The mean reduction in seizure frequency after 14 to 35 months of vagal stimulation was 46.6%. Of the 14 patients, five (35.7%) had a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Two patients, one of whom had had 10 to 100 seizures per day before stimulation, have been seizure-free for over 1 year. Adverse events were primarily limited to initial hoarseness and a tingling sensation at the electrode site in the neck when the device was activated. Most patients tolerated the device and stimulation well. There were no permanent adverse events. Some cases of medically refractory partial seizures are improved by vagal stimulation.

The effects of high-dose fluoxetine (median 80 mg/day), standard-dose imipramine (median 200 mg/day), and placebo were studied in 706 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder. Baseline psychomotor activity of each patient was prospectively categorized as agitated, retarded, or neither. Rates of occurrence of total and significant (leading to discontinuation) activating adverse events (insomnia, agitation, anxiety, nervousness) and sedating events (somnolence, asthenia) were compared between treatments on an overall basis and within categories of baseline psychomotor activity. Additionally, these rates were compared across baseline psychomotor activity for each treatment. Efficacy was evaluated on an overall basis and with respect to baseline psychomotor activity. There was more total activation with fluoxetine than placebo (p = 0.008), but total activation with fluoxetine (28%) showed only a trend (p = 0.092) for being greater than with imipramine (21%). Discontinuations for activation with fluoxetine (5%) did not differ from imipramine (5%). Sedation and discontinuations for sedation with both fluoxetine and imipramine significantly exceeded placebo. The only drug-drug difference in discontinuations was for sedation where imipramine (11%) exceeded fluoxetine (5%; p = 0.008). Only for the occurrence of sedation with imipramine (47% among patients retarded at baseline) was there a significant association with baseline psychomotor activity (p = 0.021). Both fluoxetine and imipramine were superior to placebo and equal in efficacy in decreasing total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the sleep disturbance HAM-D factor, and the anxiety/somatization HAM-D factor scores. These improvements were independent of baseline psychomotor activity.

In a multicentered study, 372 patients with mild major depressive disorder with a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of 15 to 19 were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with placebo or 20 mg, 40 mg, or 60 mg/day of fluoxetine. Patients were rated weekly for improvement and the appearance of side effects. Pattern analysis of treatment response showed more patients in the active drug treatment groups having a persistent or a delayed persistent response, the types of response specifically associated with active treatment. Analyses of mean changes in treatment measures showed little difference among treatment groups. This may be explained in part by different distributions in outcome, placebo patients having had a higher frequency of mild improvement with fewer negative and very positive outcomes. Response rate analyses favor the active treatments numerically, but only one of the comparisons is statistically significant. These findings suggest a specific role for fluoxetine treatment in mildly depressed patients who do not respond promptly or who respond inconsistently to nonspecific treatment.

This was a 6-week, double-blind comparison of fluoxetine, imipramine, and placebo in 89 patients with bipolar depression. Using the criteria of greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the HAMD-total score after at least 3 weeks on study drug, endpoint analysis showed 86% of the fluoxetine-treated patients improved compared with 57% of the imipramine-treated and 38% of the placebo-treated patients. Significantly fewer fluoxetine-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events than did imipramine-treated patients (7% vs. 30%, respectively).

The side effect profile and safety of fluoxetine are reviewed. Side effects reported more frequently with fluoxetine than with tricyclic antidepressants are nausea, nervousness, and insomnia. Anticholinergic side effects are reported less often with fluoxetine. Analysis of adverse experiences leading to discontinuations suggests that this drug has very few serious side effects. There is no evidence that fluoxetine produces a flu-like syndrome or neuropathy similar to that seen with zimelidine. It does not appear to cause phospholipidosis in humans. Fluoxetine appears to have no epileptogenic potential except at extremely high doses. It is usually well tolerated in overdoses.

A humoral factor having many of the physical properties of a glycoprotein and lacking many of the characteristics of other immunosuppressants has been detected in the serum and plasma of patients with active multiple sclerosis. Kinetic studies indicate that the earliest biochemical event inhibited by LTIF is the incorporation of labeled nucleotides into acid insoluble ribonucleic acid. This material, designated lymphocyte transformation inhibition factor (LTIF), inhibits blast transformation in mitogen-stimulated T lymphocytes. The serum factor is usually associated with active multiple sclerosis but is also detected in some lymphoproliferative disorders. Partial purification has separated this material from serum immunoglobulins, but these procedures led to an accelerated loss of biological activity.