Search

Hyperekplexia is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a point mutation in the alpha1 subunit of the glycine receptor, characterized by excessive startle responses followed by temporary generalized stiffness. Clonazepam, effective in open case studies, potentiates, through unknown mechanisms, the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Vigabatrin increases GABA by inhibition of the GABA catabolic enzyme GABA-transaminase. Effects of clonazepam (1 mg for 1 day) and vigabatrin (1000 mg per day for 5 days) were investigated in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study in 4 patients with hyperekplexia. The pharmacodynamic parameters were startle reflexes, studied 3 times during the day. At each time, 2 trains of 10 auditive stimuli (113 dB) were given at intervals of 10 and 60 s. Startle movements were quantified with summed areas of EMG-bursts of the orbicularis oculi, sternocleidomastoid, biceps and thenar muscles. The degrees of stiffness and drowsiness were quantified with visual analogue scores (VAS) 10 times during the day, by both the patient and the observer. Clonazepam, but not vigabatrin, reduced startle activity significantly in both paradigms. The degree of stiffness and drowsiness was not significantly influenced by either drug.

To evaluate the long-term reproducibility of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and concentration-effect parameters after intravenous administration of temazepam.Nine healthy volunteers were studied. Temazepam, 0.4 mg/kg, was infused intravenously for 30 minutes on two occasions 6 months apart. Venous plasma concentrations of temazepam were measured by HPLC in samples obtained between 0 and 24 hours. Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated up to 8 hours for saccadic peak velocity and electroencephalogram (EEG) beta amplitudes. Subjects' state and trait anxiety were assessed by use of the Spielberger anxiety inventory.Significant correlations between occasions were found for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values (r = 0.91; p0.01) but not for maximum concentration and half-life. Significant correlations were also found for area under the effect-time curve (AUEC) values of peak velocity (r = 0.88; p0.01) but not for peak velocity (r = 0.48; p0.05). Significant differences between the slopes of concentration effect plots on different occasions were observed in two subjects for EEG beta and in three subjects for peak velocity, with one subject showing a similar change for both parameters. Trait anxiety scores were higher on the first occasion (33 +/- 7) than on the second occasion (29 +/- 7; p0.01). A negative correlation was found between trait anxiety scores and the slopes of concentration-effect plots for peak velocity (r = -0.63; p0.01).For AUC and AUEC values the results indicate a reasonable long-term reproducibility of differences between subjects in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of temazepam. However, there were limitations to the predictive value of derived concentration-effect parameters.

Pharmacodynamic interactions of low doses of diazepam and alcohol were investigated in a double blind, randomised, 2 x 2 factorial, cross-over study in eight healthy volunteers. Alcohol or glucose 5% were administered intravenously at rates calculated to maintain breath alcohol levels of 0.5 g/l from 1.5 to 5.5 h after starting the alcohol infusion. Diazepam 5 mg or placebo were administered orally at 1.5 h. Evaluation of pharmacodynamic interactions was performed for the average results of tests performed at 2, 3.5 and 5 h. Plasma concentrations of (desmethyl-) diazepam and breath alcohol levels were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Breath alcohol reached pseudo steady state levels of 0.38 g/l (range: 0.24-0.57) after alcohol alone and 0.37 g/l (range: 0.27-0.52) in combination with diazepam. Alcohol effects were demonstrated for latency of saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit eye movements and subjective drug effects. Diazepam impaired smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, adaptive tracking, digit symbol substitution and body sway. The effects of combined alcohol and diazepam were mostly additive without significant synergistic interactions. However, in two subjects large supra-additive effects occurred at 3.5 h following alcohol+diazepam, which were not explained by increased drug levels. The design and methods used in this study proved advantageous in evaluating low dose pharmacodynamic interactions. Despite the absence of significant synergistic interactions, unanticipated impairment of performance may occur in susceptible individuals when taking combined low doses of alcohol and diazepam.

1. The effects of metoprolol-Oros 14/190 once daily, propranolol 80 mg twice daily and temazepam 10 mg once daily on central nervous system (CNS) related performance and haemodynamic variables were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Drugs were administered for 3 consecutive days except for temazepam, which was administered on days 1 and 3 only. Treatment effects were evaluated at 0, 2, 5 and 8 h on days 1 and 3. 2. Neither beta-adrenoceptor blocker had significant effects in a battery of tests after single or 3 days dosing. Temazepam caused a decrease in saccadic peak velocity of 37.4 degrees s-1 (95% CI: 6.0, 68.9) at 2 h and an increase of auditory reaction times of 11.5 ms (0.2, 22.8) at 8 h on day 1. No significant effects of temazepam were detected on day 3. 3. Both beta-adrenoceptor blockers reduced exercise heart rate. Peak effects were measured at 2 h 40 min after propranolol but not metoprolol-Oros (difference, day 1:20 (11, 29) beats min-1, day 3:13 (8, 19) beats min-1). Both beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly reduced baseline exercise heart rate on day 3. Compared with day 1, metoprolol-Oros caused larger reductions of exercise heart rate at all times on day 3. 4. Metoprolol-Oros and propranolol caused similar reductions of systolic- and diastolic blood pressure on days 1 and 3. Temazepam caused a small reduction in diastolic blood pressure at 5 h 40 min on day 1 but was otherwise devoid of haemodynamic effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1. Healthy student volunteers (n = 103) participating in ongoing clinical pharmacological research completed the Dutch Personality Inventory (DPI), the Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-DY) and the Dutch version of the Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS). 2. The volunteers were more extrovert (P less than 0.001), more flexible (P less than 0.001), more tolerant or less impulsive (P less than 0.001), had more self-confidence and initiative (P less than 0.001), and were more satisfied and optimistic (P less than 0.01) when compared with the general norm. When compared with a student norm, volunteers had lower levels of state (P less than 0.001) and trait (P less than 0.05) anxiety. The general sensation seeking tendency of volunteers was higher than in the student norm group (P less than 0.001). The volunteers had a greater tendency to thrill-and-adventure-seeking (P less than 0.001) and to disinhibition (P less than 0.01). 3. Hence, volunteers were a selected sample of the total population of students. This may influence the interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. 4. Personality screening should be added to the screening procedures for volunteers.

The effects of single oral doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg temazepam were evaluated with the adaptive tracking test, analysis of smooth-pursuit and saccadic eye movements, and visual analog lines in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover experiment with 12 healthy volunteers. Pharmacodynamic testing was performed until 10 hours and pharmacokinetics were evaluated until 24 hours. Temazepam, 20 mg, caused effects in all tests, with peak effects occurring at 30 minutes. The 10 mg dose caused effects on saccadic eye movements and subjective scores of alertness, whereas 5 mg temazepam was detected only by analysis of saccadic eye movements. Linear relationships between plasma concentrations and effects were found in nine subjects for saccadic peak velocity and eight subjects for subjective scores of alertness. The results of this study demonstrate manifest differences in the sensitivities of performance tests and stress the importance of validation of methods when effects of drugs on human performance are studied.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Reactive oxygen species (ROS), like superoxide anion, play an important role in different disease states. • Superoxide dismutase (SOD) acts as a free radical scavenger by catalysing the dismutation of superoxide. • Over the last decade, therapeutic use of SOD has been explored, but the results of these experiments have indicated that this has been of limited value, probably due to unfavourable pharmaceutical characteristics of the compounds. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • Single intravenous administrations of PC-SOD (SOD covalently linked to lecithin) in doses up to 80 mg was well tolerated and biologically active for a period of 19 ± 6 h in healthy White volunteers. • This suggests that PC-SOD has pharmaceutically appropriate characteristics and may be a possible protective agent for patients in clinical conditions characterized by acute high radical overload. AIM To study the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of single rising doses up to 80 mg of superoxide dismutase covalently linked to lecithin (PC-SOD) in healthy White volunteers. METHODS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period cross-over study was performed in eight healthy volunteers (four male/four female). Three doses of PC-SOD (20, 40 and 80 mg) and placebo were administered intravenously in randomized order. Serum and urinary PC-SOD concentrations were measured predose and up to 96 h after dosing. In addition to standard safety measurements, the urinary excretion of N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-glutathione S-transferase (α-GST) and π-GST was measured to evaluate renal function. The PK of PC-SOD was analysed using noncompartmental and compartmental methods. RESULTS All treatments were well tolerated, and no obvious relationship between adverse events and treatment was observed. No effects of PC-SOD on renal function could be detected. Dose normalized Cmax and AUC were not different between the different dosages, indicating linearity of plasma concentrations with dose. Estimated PC-SOD clearance was 2.54 ml min−1[95% confidence interval (CI) 2.07, 2.83]. The terminal half-life was estimated to be 1.54 days (95% CI 0.93, 2.15). SOD activity was elevated above baseline for 19 ± 6 h after the 80-mg dose. CONCLUSIONS Single intravenous administrations of PC-SOD in doses up to 80 mg were well tolerated in healthy White male and female volunteers. With the doses used, SOD activity was linearly related to the dose; after the 80-mg dose it was present for an appreciable period. These findings suggest that it is worthwhile to investigate PC-SOD in clinical conditions characterized by a high radical overload.

The role of motilin in the regulation of upper gastrointestinal (GI) motility is well defined. However, little is known about the effects on the distal GI tract. To investigate the effect of exogenous motilin on rectal function, barostat measurements in the rectum were performed and lower abdominal symptoms were scored.Eight fasted, healthy volunteers were infused intravenously with synthetic motilin or placebo over 90 min in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design. Rectum volume was measured with a barostat device during constant pressure and during isobaric distensions. Lower abdominal symptoms were scored by visual analogue scales. Plasma motilin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay.Baseline rectum volumes were similar between treatments: 185 +/- 62 mL (motilin) and 136 +/- 41 mL (placebo). During the constant pressure procedure, motilin increased rectum volume [area under the effect curve (AUEC)] by 6%[95% confidence interval (CI) -3, 16] of baseline, compared with placebo. During isobaric distensions motilin increased rectum volume (AUEC) by 43 mL (95% CI 0.4, 85; P0.05) and compliance by 10 mL mmHg-1 (95% CI 0.3, 20; P0.05) relative to placebo. Motilin did not induce changes in the sensation of rectal feelings.Exogenous motilin increased rectal compliance in healthy volunteers, without affecting rectal sensations.

To assess non-invasively the dose-response relations for the effects of exogenous motilin on antrum contraction frequency, gall-bladder volume and gastric myoelectrical activity.In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study, 10 fasted healthy volunteers were infused intravenously with synthetic human motilin (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 pmol x min/kg) or placebo for 60 min. Gall-bladder volume and antrum contractions were assessed by ultrasonography and gastric myoelectrical activity by electrogastrography. Motilin concentrations were measured using a radioimmunoassay.Baseline plasma motilin levels (60 pmol/L) were similar for all treatments. Motilin levels increased upon the start of infusion and rapidly returned to baseline after cessation of the infusion. At motilin doses of 2 and 4 pmol.min/kg, the antrum contraction frequency was significantly augmented, with maximum differences of two contractions per 2-min interval compared to placebo, while no changes in gastric myoelectrical activity were observed. Changes in gall-bladder volume were not significantly different for any of the motilin doses compared to placebo.Motilin increased antrum contraction frequency, whereas no effect on gastric myoelectrical activity was observed. Antrum contraction frequency appears to be a useful biomarker for motilin efficacy, and motilin doses of 2 and 4 pmol x min/kg were equally effective.

Ebastine is an H1-receptor antagonist with a relative lack of sedating properties. It is almost completely converted to carebastine, and it is this metabolite which is responsible for the antihistaminic effect. Twelve healthy subjects received a single 20 mg dose of ebastine on day 2 of a multiple oral dosing regimen of either cimetidine (400 mg three times daily and 800 mg in the evening on the day preceding ebastine administration and 400 mg four times daily on the 2 following days) or placebo in a randomised cross-over design. Significant plasma concentrations of ebastine were not detected after either treatment. The AUC of carebastine was not affected by cimetidine coadministration (4049 +/- 985 ng ml-1 h after cimetidine vs 3795 +/- 959 ng ml-1 h after placebo; 95% confidence interval of the difference: -412 to 919). Cimetidine coadministration did not induce any effect of ebastine on blood pressure and heart rate or cause sedation.

To study the delivery of 15 mg beclomethasone 17,21-dipropionate (BDP) to the distal part of the small bowel for three oral sustained-release formulations (I-III) and a reference capsule in volunteer ileostomists, and to compare these findings with the in vitro dissolution profiles.Two groups of nine ileostomy volunteers (aged 20-61 years), who were otherwise healthy, were enrolled in the study. The recovery of BDP and its metabolite beclomethasone 17-monopropionate (B17P) in ileostomy effluent was investigated in a cross-over study after administration of formulations I or II or a reference capsule containing micronised BDP, and in a second open study after administration of formulation III. Radio-opaque granules were coadministered for evaluation of gastrointestinal passage. Ileostomy effluents were collected hourly for 10-12 h following drug intake. After marker beads had been counted on X-rays, ileostomy collections were analysed for BDP and its metabolites. Cumulative recovery, lag-time and mean transit time were determined for drug and marker beads.Gastrointestinal passage characteristics were similar for all treatments. Total drug recovery was approximately three times higher for the sustained-release formulations than for the reference capsule. Recovery of B17P from stoma fluid samples was significantly lower for formulation III than for formulations I and II.The novel oral formulations delivered substantial amounts of steroid drug at the distal small bowel/proximal colon, which may warrant further studies to evaluate clinical applicability.

OBJECTIVE Growth hormone release in response to all known stimuli of GH secretion is blunted in obese subjects. Several studies, using dl-fenfluramine (dl-FF) as a serotoninergic tool, suggest that brain serotonin plays a role in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon. However, the effect of dl-FF appears to be dependent on the stimulus used to induce GH release. Furthermore, dl-FF has catecholamingergic properties apart from its capacity to stimulate serotonin release and to block its re-uptake. In this study, we investigated whether subchronic treatment with the highly selective serotoninergic drug dexfenfluramine (d-FF) affects the GH response to galanin or GHRH in obese subjects. DESIGN The study had a randomized, cross-over, placebo controlled design. d-FF was administered in a dose of 15 mg twice daily during 6 days. On days 5 and 6 of treatment (with either d-FF or placebo) an i.v. bolus injection of 100 μg hGHRH(1-44) or a continuous infusion of p-galanin (40 pmol/kg/min over 40 minutes) were administered in randomized order. All tests were performed in the follicular phase of two consecutive menstrual cycles. PATIENTS Eight obese women (body mass index (BMI) 34.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2); 7 normal weight (BMI 21.9 ± 1.9 kg/m2) age-matched control women. All women had a regular menstrual cycle. None used oral contraceptive drugs. MEASUREMENTS GH response to either stimulus was measured both during treatment with d-FF and during treatment with placebo. RESULTS The GH response to galanin and the response to GHRH were significantly smaller in obese subjects. d-FF significantly reduced the galanin induced GH secretion in obese subjects, but not in normal weight controls. It did not significantly affect GH release in response to GHRH in either group. CONCLUSION This study confirms that GH secretion in response to stimuli with varying mechanisms of action is blunted in obese subjects. A decrease of central serotonin mediated neurotransmission does not appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon.

Fifteen bulimic women (BN) and 19 healthy female controls (CO) were studied. The subjects were cross-over treated with either fluoxetine (FXT) or placebo during 4 days. They received, in randomized order, a breakfast containing pure carbohydrate (CHO) or a protein-rich (PROT) breakfast following day 3 and 4 of each treatment period. Twenty-nine different food items were offered for lunch. The fasting serum glucose and insulin concentrations and the fasting plasma tryptophan (Trp)/large neutral amino acid (LNAA) ratio were slightly higher in BN. The changes of these metabolic parameters in response to a CHO or PROT breakfast were similar in both groups. Across breakfast type, the plasma (Trp)/(LNAA) ratio at 120 min after breakfast was higher in BN. Total caloric intake at lunchtime was less in BN. In CO, less carbohydrate was selected at lunchtime following the CHO breakfast, an effect that was abolished by FXT. Breakfast type or FXT did not have any apparent effect on food intake at lunchtime in BN. This might indicate that bulimic subjects are less sensitive to serotoninergic stimuli than control subjects.

The validity of a patient-based scale, presumably measuring adverse effects of drugs on cognitive function, was examined in a normal volunteer study. Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to placebo or one of two doses of a benzodiazepine, temazepam (10 mg and 20 mg), in a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group design. Plasma samples were taken before the scale was completed and up to 8 hours post-dose. After administration of the medication the subjects were asked to maintain their normal daily routine as much as possible (reading, studying, conversations). The inventory was administered twice, at 50 minutes and 2 hours post-dose (peak level). The overall score was different between the three groups, only for the second assessment, 2 h post-dose (ANOVA, P < 0.02). Multiple t-testing between the three groups revealed statistically significant differences between placebo and the 10 mg temazepam group (P = 0.02) and between placebo and the 20 mg temazepam group (P = 0.006). No significant difference was found between the two temazepam groups. Analysis of the separate questions showed least sensitivity for questions related to the domain of 'hyperexcitability' and most sensitivity for 'fatigue' and 'slowing.' The overall score appeared to be sensitive already for the lower toxicity range suggesting an 'all or nothing effect'. The subjective reports, collected by using this scale, may therefore be used for the detection of gross overall changes in cognitive functioning.

1. In a previous study it was demonstrated that a decrease in liver blood flow produced a decrease in clearance of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). 2. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way, cross-over investigation was to determine the effect of nifedipine (20 mg orally), a compound that increases liver blood flow, on plasma concentrations of steady state endogenous and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA and rt-PA) (35 mg of rt-PA over 2 h) in nine healthy male volunteers. 3. Nifedipine increased liver blood flow by 95% (42-167%) (mean (95% confidence interval)) as assessed by indocyanine green (ICG, 0.5 mg kg-1 i.v. bolus injection) clearance. 4. Nifedipine did not influence the plasma concentrations of total rt-PA antigen and activity as evaluated by the areas under the rt-PA curves from 30 min (time at which nifedipine was ingested) to 90 min during the rt-PA infusion (P > 0.05) and by analysis of a possible treatment x time interaction (P > 0.05). In addition, the plasma concentrations of endogenous t-PA remained unchanged when nifedipine was given alone. 5. In conclusion, by using nifedipine as a model compound it was demonstrated that the combination of rt-PA and a compound which increases liver blood flow probably does not lead to substantial changes in plasma concentrations of rt-PA.

1. Concentration-effect relationships of midazolam were assessed in an open study in six healthy volunteers. Saccadic eye movements and EEG parameters derived by fast Fourier transform (FFT) and aperiodic analysis (AP) were used to quantify drug effects. 2. Midazolam was infused at a rate of 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1 for a maximum of 15 min. Hypnotic effects were avoided by terminating infusions when subjects could no longer perform the eye movement test properly. 3. Wake-sleep transitions could be recognized through frequent observation of eye movements. The dose needed to reach maximum conscious sedation averaged 0.10 mg kg-1, ranging from 0.06 to 0.13 mg kg-1. 4. Sigmoidal concentration-effect relationships were found for EEG beta-amplitudes in five of six subjects, with average EC50 values (+/- s.d.) of 120 +/- 54 ng ml-1 for FFT and 104 +/- 40 ng ml-1 for AP. For the 'total number of waves' in the beta frequency range (AP) an average (n = 6) EC50 of 63 +/- 37 ng ml-1 was found. Changes in EEG alpha-amplitudes were found in three subjects, resulting in an average EC50 value of 55 +/- 32 ng ml-1. 5. For saccadic peak velocity (PV) concentration-effect relationships were linear in five subjects and sigmoidal in one. The maximal measured decrease in PV averaged -44 +/- 9%. 6. The differences in concentration-effect relationships for various effect parameters call for further studies with emphasis on the external validity and reproducibility of data. In such studies the dose needed to reach wake-sleep transition may be used as a relevant clinical end-point.

1. We have studied the absolute bioavailability of three oral formulations of digoxin, 1.0 mg, in 12 young healthy volunteers in a four way randomised cross-over study using an intravenous control. 2. Digoxin tablets (250 micrograms), liquid filled digoxin capsules (100 micrograms) and an experimental enteric-coated capsule (100 micrograms) were evaluated. In vitro dissolution at pH 1 demonstrated extensive hydrolytic breakdown of digoxin from the tablets and capsules but not from the enteric-coated capsules. 3. Serum 'digoxin' concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPI). The systemic availability (+/- s.d.) of the capsules was 70.5 +/- 11.3%, and that of the tablets 71.5 +/- 8.6%. Drug was less available from the enteric-coated capsules (62.1 +/- 10.3%) measured with FPI. These results were reflected in the urinary drug recoveries measured by FPI. 4. By contrast, there were no differences in urinary recovery of unchanged digoxin between any of the oral treatments, when this was measured by h.p.l.c. The cross-reactivity of immunoassays for metabolites of digoxin may produce artefactual results and the optimal pharmaceutical formulation for digoxin remains to be determined.

We have studied the pharmacodynamic effects of ramipril, propranolol, and their combination, as well as the effect of propranolol on the pharmacokinetics of ramipril in 12 healthy men (age 24 (SD 6) y, weight 72 (7) kg). Propranolol and placebo, ramipril and placebo, or propranolol and ramipril were given orally for four days in a crossover, double-blind fashion. The pharmacokinetics of ramipril and ramiprilat were investigated on day 4. Effects on plasma renin activity, ACE activity, and heart rate and blood pressure both before and after a standardized exercise test were measured on days 1 and 4. On day 4 the combination reduced the mean arterial pressure by 2.8 mmHg compared with propranolol alone and by 3.7 mmHg compared with ramipril alone. Ramipril had no effect on the bradycardia induced by propranolol. Propranolol reduced exercise mean arterial pressure by 9 mmHg (day 4) and heart rate by 7 beats.min-1 (day 4) compared with ramipril; this was not affected by co-administration of ramipril. On day 4 the average plasma renin activity was not significantly higher than after the combination. ACE activity was not affected by propranolol. The pharmacokinetics of ramipril and ramiprilat were not influenced by propranolol. The combination of ramipril and propranolol has additive pharmacodynamic effects that may be useful in the treatment of hypertension.

The pharmacokinetics of racemic (rac) felodipine, rac-nitrendipine and nifedipine (all given as an oral dose of 20 mg in solution) have been investigated in a randomised cross-over study in 12 healthy male subjects using stereoselective assays. Both felodipine and nitrendipine exhibited stereoselective pharmacokinetics. On average, the AUCs of the active (S)-enantiomers of felodipine and nitrendipine were 139% and 104% higher than those of their optical antipodes, but the elimination half-lives of the enantiomers of each racemate were not different. The AUCs of nifedipine, rac-felodipine, rac-nitrendipine and of their enantiomers were highly correlated (all r>0.83), suggesting closely related rate limiting steps in the in vivo first-pass metabolism of these high-clearance drugs. Stereoselectivity was only a minor contributor to inter-individual variability in the oral pharmacokinetics of these compounds in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND In this study, the anticoagulant response of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was investigated in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers to determine variabilities in response and modifying factors. METHODS AND RESULTS On the fourth day after thrombolytic therapy, blood samples were taken before and at frequent intervals until 10 hours after the injection of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. Plasma anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured in addition to body weight and thickness of the abdominal subcutaneous fat layer. Contrary to expectations, the increase of anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and APTT compared with baseline (predrug) levels was very small, with an average maximal APTT of 42.6 seconds (SD, 12.4 seconds; range, 30.4-70.7 seconds). Subsequently, the influence of the length of the injection needle on the anticoagulant effect of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was studied in 10 healthy volunteers to find a factor that could be responsible for the poor response in the patients. The length of the injection needle did not influence the anticoagulant effect of heparin. Large interindividual and intraindividual variabilities were seen in the volunteers. The majority of volunteers had minimal prolongation of the APTT, but very strong prolongation was also seen (maximal APTT, 163 seconds). There was no correlation between the abdominal skinfold thickness and anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, or APTT (p > 0.05), but in the patient study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and anti-IIa activity (p < 0.05), and in the volunteer study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and APTT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Subcutaneous administration of heparin in a fixed dose for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes may be inadequate because of the large interindividual and intraindividual variations in anticoagulant effect.

The intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and effects of oral nifedipine (10 mg), administered with 1 week intervals, was investigated in twelve young healthy subjects. The population estimate of the coefficient of intraindividual variability (CVw) in AUC of nifedipine (13%) was much smaller than the pure between-subject variability (CVb 54%). The long-term (1 1/2 year) intraindividual variability was much larger than the short-term variability. Maximum changes from baseline-values of mean blood pressure (SBP -5%, DBP -4%) and mean heart rate (HR +21%) were small. Individual maximum changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (SBP, DBP, and HR) and areas under effect curves were highly variable (CVw 34-250%, CVb 8-88%). For most subjects a significant positive linear relation was observed between nifedipine plasma concentration and the change in HR (mean r = 0.63). The CVw in slope (106%) and intercept (685%) were even larger than the high CVb in these parameters (38% and 252%). Changes in blood pressure were not significantly related to nifedipine plasma concentrations within these healthy subjects. The small intraindividual variability in nifedipine pharmacokinetics allows crossover studies to detect pharmacokinetic relationships between nifedipine and other dihydropyridine calcium entry blockers.

The effects of grapefruit juice (150 ml at -15, -10, -1/4, +5, and +10 hours) and cimetidine (200 mg at the same times) on the stereoselective pharmacokinetics and effects of 20 mg oral racemic nitrendipine were investigated in a placebo-controlled crossover study in nine healthy men. In all subjects the AUC of racemic nitrendipine was increased by grapefruit juice (mean increase 106%; 95% confidence interval 64% to 158%) and cimetidine treatment (+154%; 95% confidence interval 77% to 265%). Comparable results were obtained for the peak plasma drug concentration and for both parameters of (S)- and (R)-nitrendipine. There were highly significant differences in the area under the concentration-time curve and peak plasma drug concentration between enantiomers within all treatments. Grapefruit juice had no effect on this stereoselectivity, but cimetidine increased the mean S/R ratio of areas under the curve (2.25) by 20% (95% confidence interval 12% to 29%) compared with placebo treatment (1.89). Half-lives and time to reach peak concentration of the enantiomers were not different within and between treatments. There were no consistent effects on blood pressure with all treatments, but in most subjects there was a small temporary increase in heart rate after intake of nitrendipine. Grapefruit juice and cimetidine did not affect these hemodynamic parameters and did not cause additional adverse effects.

The absorption of high and low molecular fractions of heparin from the subcutaneous compartment was evaluated in eight healthy males. They were given an intravenous infusion of 4000 U calcium heparin in 4 hours and on another occasion a subcutaneous injection of 12,500 U calcium heparin (washout period of 1 week). Anticoagulation was monitored by anti-Xa, antithrombin activity, and activated partial thromboplastin time. To evaluate factors that might influence absorption, body weight, body fat, and abdominal skinfold thickness were recorded. There was a pronounced inter-individual variability in absorption but the absorption of the two fractions of heparin was similar. The highly variable absorption was related to the abdominal skinfold thickness, and this could have implications for therapeutic and prophylactic heparin regimens.

The influence of food intake on the bioavailability of metoprolol from an OROS system has been investigated. No significant difference was found between OROS administration to fasting subjects or after breakfast in any of the kinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax, tmax, C24 and lag time). Therefore, metoprolol OROS can be administered with breakfast.

Saccadic eye movements were analyzed after single oral doses of 20 mg temazepam and placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover study in eight healthy volunteers. For an optimal evaluation of concentration-effect relationships, 18 blood samples and 43 effect measures were obtained over 33 1/2 hours. After placebo, saccadic peak velocity decreased within the first hour, with average values remaining 6.2% to 12.1% below baseline up to 15 hours after intake. After temazepam, significant changes in peak velocity occurred for 5 hours, with maximum decreases averaging 29.2% (95% confidence interval, 10.0 to 37.2). The apparent duration of effects ranged from 3 to 9 hours in individual subjects. Linear concentration-effect relationships were demonstrated for peak velocity, with individual slopes ranging from -0.11 to -0.46 deg/sec.(ng/ml)-1 (average r = -0.82, all p < 0.01). Differences in protein binding of temazepam did not account for the approximate fourfold variability in individual sensitivities to temazepam. By increasing the frequency of measurements, the accuracy of pharmacodynamic evaluations was clearly enhanced in this study.

1. Endogenous fibrinolytic capacity increases after administration of 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin. This increase is commonly attributed to an increase in release of tissue-type plasminogen activator from the endothelium. However, the possibility that 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin influences liver blood flow, which is a major determinant of tissue-type plasminogen activator clearance, cannot be ruled out. 2. The influence of 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin on haemodynamics, liver blood flow and fibrinolytic parameters was investigated in a randomized double-blind cross-over study in nine healthy male subjects (age 20–26 years). 3. 1-Desamino-8-d-vasopressin exerted significant haemodynamic effects: mean arterial pressure decreased maximally 12 (95% confidence interval 8–15) mmHg and heart rate increased maximally 21 (95% confidence interval 15–27) beats/min. 4. Endogenous fibrinolytic parameters increased after administration of 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin. Both tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen and tissue-type plasminogen activator activity were elevated and showed the maximal response shortly after drug administration was completed. 5. 1-Desamino-8-d-vasopressin increased portal venous blood flow as measured with echo-Doppler. The maximal increase in mean blood flow of 55 (95% confidence interval 19–92)% was observed at the end of the 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin infusion and coincided with the maximal changes in systemic haemodynamics and fibrinolytic parameters. The increase in portal blood flow was not reflected in significant changes in Indocyanine Green clearance. It appears that the Indocyanine Green method is relatively insensitive to increases in liver blood flow. 6. The observed increase in fibrinolytic activity due to tissue-type plasminogen activator activity after 1-desamino-8-d-vasopressin administration may be due to an increased release of tissue-type plasminogen activator from the endothelium and is not caused by changes in clearance.