Search

Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce.To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico.Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI.In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.

To clinically characterize the events of anaphylaxis in a third-level pediatric hospital.1148 clinical records were reviewed. Eventually, the information of 35 events of anaphylaxis in 20 patients was analyzed; three of them had multiple episodes of anaphylaxis.The median age for the anaphylactic episodes was 11 years (Interquartile range 10 years, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), predominantly in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 years, and there was a slight predominance in women. The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (86%), followed by respiratory (83%), cardiovascular (74%), and gastrointestinal (46%) alterations. Cardiac arrest was documented in three episodes; however, no anaphylaxis-related deaths were reported. The main triggers for anaphylaxis were food (34%), medications (29%), allergen-specific immunotherapy (14%), and latex (11%). In patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, the clinical behavior was severe. Epinephrine was administered in 27 out of the 35 events (77%), but only in 11 cases it was the first-line treatment. Systemic corticosteroids were the most frequently used treatment, followed by epinephrine and antihistamines.The use of epinephrine, which is the mainstay of the treatment, is suboptimal; with a preferred use of second-line medications like corticosteroids. Clear protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, as well as continuous education of health personnel, are necessary.Objetivo: Caracterizar clínicamente los eventos de anafilaxia en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se revisaron 1148 expedientes clínicos. Finalmente, se analizó la información correspondiente a 35 episodios de anafilaxia en 20 pacientes; tres de ellos con múltiples episodios de anafilaxia. Resultados: La edad mediana de los episodios de anafilaxia fue de 11 años (rango intercuartilar 10 años, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), con predomino en adolescentes de 12 a 17 años y del sexo femenino. Las manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes fueron las cutáneas (86 %), seguidas de las respiratorias (83 %), las cardiovasculares (74 %) y las gastrointestinales (46 %). En tres casos se documentó paro cardiorrespiratorio, pero no hubo casos de mortalidad asociada a anafilaxia. Los principales desencadenantes fueron alimentos (34 %), medicamentos (29 %), inmunoterapia para alérgenos (14 %) y látex (11 %). En los pacientes con anafilaxia perioperatoria el comportamiento clínico fue grave. La adrenalina se utilizó en 27 de los 35 episodios (77 %), en 11 de ellos fue el tratamiento de primera elección. Los corticosteroides sistémicos fueron los medicamentos más frecuentemente utilizados, seguidos de la adrenalina y los antihistamínicos. Conclusiones: El uso de adrenalina, pilar del tratamiento de anafilaxia, es subóptimo; con uso preferente de medicamentos de segunda línea como los corticosteroides. Se requieren protocolos para diagnóstico y tratamiento de anafilaxia, aunado a una educación continua del personal de salud.

Proinflammatory cytokines and the novel myokine irisin, a cleavage product of FNDC5, have been found to play a role in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Irisin has been shown to increase browning of adipose tissue, thermogenesis, energy expenditure, and insulin sensitivity, yet its association with inflammatory markers is still limited. Circulating irisin has been found to be increased in obesity, while in adult subjects with T2DM decreased levels have been found. However, data establishing the association of circulating irisin in children and adolescents with T2DM has not been described in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine irisin plasma concentration and its association with metabolic and adiposity markers and with hs-CRP, a surrogate marker of inflammation used in clinical practice, in a pediatric population with T2DM. A cross-sample of 40 Mexican children and adolescents aged 7-17 were recruited, 20 diagnosed with T2DM and 20 healthy controls. Plasma irisin levels were found to be lower in the T2DM group compared with controls, which could be attributed to a reduced PGC-1α activity in muscle tissue with a consequent decrease in FNDC5 and irisin expression. Irisin concentration was found to be positively correlated with HDL-c, LDL-c, and total cholesterol, while negatively correlated with BMI, waist circumference, and triglycerides. However, after multiple regression analysis, only HDL-c correlation remained significant. hs-CRP was higher in the T2DM group and positively associated with adiposity markers, unfavorable lipid profile, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR, but no association with irisin was found. Given the favorable metabolic effects attributed to irisin, the low plasma levels found in children and adolescents with T2DM could exacerbate the inflammatory and metabolic imbalances and the intrinsic cardiovascular risk of this disease. We propose an “irisin-proinflammatory/anti-inflammatory axis” to explain the role of irisin as a metabolic regulator in obesity and T2DM.