Search

Psychiatric events are thought to be more frequent in people with epileptic seizures than in the general population. However, inter-ictal psychiatric events attributable to epilepsy remain controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the occurrence of psychiatric events in a population of fairly unselected patients with epilepsy and in the general population, and the correlation between psychiatric complaints and selected demographic and disease characteristics. The survey was part of a multicentre prospective cohort study of everyday life risks conducted in eight European countries and comparing referral children and adults with epilepsy referred to secondary/tertiary centers to age- and sex-matched non-epileptic controls. Nine hundred and fifty-one patients with epilepsy and 909 controls were studied. Each patient and his/her control received a diary to record any accident or illness, with severity, circumstances, causes, consequences, and (for the cases) the possible relation to a seizure. The follow-up period ranged between 1 and 2 years. Fifty-eight psychiatric events occurred in 25 patients (2.6%) and 88 in 19 controls (2.1%). Housewives (9.3%) and unemployed persons (4.1%) were mostly affected. No correlation was found between psychiatric events, demographic and disease characteristics. Our results suggest that people with epilepsy if unselected are not at higher risk for psychiatric disorders than the general population. © 2007 British Epilepsy Association.

Purpose: To investigate the risk of accidents in a cohort of patients with epilepsy and in matched nonepilepsy controls. by type, circumstances, and complications. Methods: A total of 95 1 children and adults with idiopathic, cryptogenic, or remote symptomatic epilepsy and 904 matched controls seen in secondary and tertiary centers in eight European Countries (England. Estonia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal. Russia. and Slovenia) were followed Lip prospectively for 17,484 and 17.206 person-months and asked to report any accident requiring medical attention. its site, and complications. Risk assessment was done by using actuarial methods, relative risks (RRs). and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: During the study period, 199 (21%) patients and 123 (14%) controls reported all accident (p < 0.0001); 24% were seizure related. The Cumulative probability of accidents at 12 and 24 months was 17 and 27% in the cases and 12 and 17% in the controls. The risk was highest for concussions (RR, 2.6; 95% Cl, 1.2-5.8), abrasions (RR, 2.1; 95% Cl, 1.1-4.0), and Wounds (RR, 1.9; Cl, 1.2-3.1). Domestic accidents prevailed in both groups, followed by street and work accidents, and were more common among cases. Compared with controls, patients with epilepsy reported more hospitalization, complications, and medical action. Disease characteristics associated with an increased risk of accidents included generalized epilepsy (conclusions), active epilepsy, and at least monthly seizures (abrasions). Most risks decreased, becoming nonsignificant after excluding, seizure-related events. Conclusions: Patients with epilepsy are at higher risk of accidents and their complications. However, the risk was substantially lower after exclusion of seizure-related events

Summary: Purpose: To assess the risk of illnesses and accidents in patients with epilepsy and to evaluate the proportion of those risks attributable to epilepsy. Methods: Nine hundred fifty-one referral patients with idiopathic, cryptogenic, or remote symptomatic epilepsy and 909 matched controls (relatives or friends) were followed up prospectively for 1–2 years in eight European countries (Italy, Germany, Holland, England, Portugal, Russia, Estonia, and Slovenia). Each patient and control received a diary to keep notes regarding any illness or accident. Patients with epilepsy specifically recorded relations with seizures. Results: Six hundred forty-four patients recorded 2,491 illnesses compared with 1,665 illnesses in 508 controls. The cumulative probability of illness in patients was 49% by 12 months and 86% by 24 months (controls, 39 and 75%; p < 0.0001). One hundred ninety-nine patients and 124 controls had 270 and 140 accidents, respectively. The cumulative probability of accident in the cases was 17 and 27% by 12 and 24 months (controls, 12 and 17%; p < 0.0001). The chance of two or more illnesses or accidents was modestly but significantly greater in the patients. Illnesses and accidents were mostly trivial. Thirty percent of illnesses and 24% of accidents were seizure related. When illnesses and accidents related to seizures were excluded, the chance of illnesses and accidents was fairly similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with idiopathic, cryptogenic, or remote symptomatic epilepsy have a moderately higher risk of illnesses and accidents than do the general population. With few exceptions, the events are trivial. When seizure-related events are excluded, patients with epilepsy are not at any significantly higher risk of illnesses and accidents.

To assess the prognosis of the Guillain-Barré syndrome and identify the main prognostic indicators, 297 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome recruited through a network of Italian centres were followed up for 24 months or until clinical recovery, whichever was earliest. For each patient the time to plateau, improvement, clinical recovery, or death was calculated, and prognostic indicators (age, sex, antecedent events, disability at admission and nadir, electrophysiological patterns) and treatments were noted. The mean duration of follow-up was 309 days. During this period, 212 patients (71%) recovered, 48 (16%) had residua and 33 (11%) died. The mean times to nadir, improvement and clinical recovery were 12, 28 and 200 days. Using life-tables and survival curves, the cumulative probability of achieving the plateau of symptoms was 73% by 1 week and 98% by 4 weeks. Improvement started during the first week in 36% of cases and within 4 weeks in 85%. The rates of clinical recovery at 1 and 4 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months were 4, 24, 57, 70 and 82%, respectively. The chance of recovery was significantly affected by age, antecedent gastroenteritis, disability, electrophysiological signs of axonopathy, latency to nadir and duration of active disease. The main treatments did not seem to affect the chance of recovery