Search

There is considerable debate in the literature regarding what to call functional seizures, with terms such as pseudoseizures, nonepileptic attack disorder (NEAD), and dissociative seizures being used. Provision of an accurate diagnosis and coherent explanation is a vital first step in the management of functional seizures and can result in cessation or reduced frequency for some individuals. This study investigated preferences for and offensiveness of terms used to describe functional seizures, and expectations for recovery with psychological treatment. A sample of 87 healthy adults completed an online survey, in which eight different diagnostic terms were ranked in order of preference (1 — most preferred, 8 — least preferred): functional nonepileptic attacks (FNEA), dissociative seizures, functional seizures, psychogenic seizures, NEAD, pseudoseizures, conversion disorder, and hysteria. Replicating Stone and colleagues protocol, each term was investigated for five connotations. Offense scores were calculated from the number of participants who selected ‘yes’ to at least one of the negative connotations (‘Putting it on’, ‘Mad’, and ‘Imagining Symptoms’). Expectations about the possibility of recovering through medical or psychological treatment were also recorded. Functional nonepileptic attack was ranked the highest preferred term with dissociative seizures and functional seizures closely following. Nonepileptic attack disorder was the least offensive term, with FNEA and functional seizures joint second. Unsurprisingly, the three least preferred terms were also the most offensive: pseudoseizures, conversion disorder, and hysteria. Expectations of nonrecovery from psychological treatment were lowest for terms implicating a psychological cause: pseudoseizures, dissociative seizures, psychogenic seizures, and hysteria. The results suggest that either the terms FNEA or functional seizures should be adopted by healthcare professionals and patients, as they are the most preferred, least offensive, and expectations for nonrecovery with psychological treatment were moderate compared with the other terms. Limitations and areas for future research are discussed.

Background: Men and women show differences in performance on emotional processing tasks. Sex also interacts with personality traits to affect information processing. Here we examine effects of sex, and two personality traits that are differentially expressed in men and women – instrumentality and communality – on voluntary and involuntary memory for distressing video-footage. / Methods: On session one, participants (n = 39 men; 40 women) completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, which assesses communal and instrumental traits. After viewing film-footage of death/serious injury, participants recorded daily involuntary memories (intrusions) relating to the footage on an online diary for seven days, returning on day eight for a second session to perform a voluntary memory task relating to the film. / Results: Communality interacted with sex such that men with higher levels of communality reported more frequent involuntary memories. Alternatively, a communality × sex interaction reflected a tendency for women with high levels of communality to perform more poorly on the voluntary recognition memory task. / Limitations: The study involved healthy volunteers with no history of significant psychological disorder. Future research with clinical populations will help to determine the generalizability of the current findings. / Conclusion: Communality has separate effects on voluntary and involuntary emotional memory. We suggest that high levels of communality in men and women may confer vulnerability to the negative effects of stressful events either through the over-encoding of sensory/perceptual-information in men or the reduced encoding of contextualised, verbally-based, voluntarily accessible representations in women.