Search

Research Question: Does aromatase inhibitor improve IVF outcomes by reducing local oestrogen production in patients with adenomyosis undergoing long-term gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment?, Design: Four patients with severe adenomyosis who failed to improve after long-term treatment (≥3 months) with depot GnRHa received treatment with an aromatase inhibitor for 21 days. Blood oestradiol concentrations were monitored after GnRHa treatment both before and after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor. Women received a transfer of IVF autologous or donor oocytes. Pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were the primary outcomes. Blood oestradiol concentration after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was a secondary outcome., Results: Patients with severe adenomyosis presented with hyperestrogenism due to local production from the lesions even after long-term treatment with GnRHa. Treatment with an aromatase inhibitor reduced hyperestrogenism and improved clinical outcomes in adenomyosis patients who have experienced previous embryo transfer failures., Conclusion: Women with severe adenomyosis would benefit from letrozole or a combination of GnRHa plus letrozole before receipt of treatment with assisted reproductive technology. For women with severe adenomyosis, GnRHa treatment alone may be insufficient to suppress oestrogen production by adenomyotic lesions. Thus, it should be mandatory to test for oestradiol concentrations in patients with severe adenomyosis who have received long-term GnRHa treatment. Also, GnRHa may not always be the sole strategy for medical management of adenomyotic lesions. Letrozole is safe and can improve IVF outcomes for patients with adenomyosis., (Copyright © 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Research Question: Do patients with adenomyosis present a dysregulated endometrial receptivity that can be reversed with personalized embryo transfer (PET) by transcriptomic-based progesterone adjustment, improving IVF outcomes?, Design: A multicentre, retrospective, cohort study that transcriptomically analysed the endometrial receptivity of the endometrium in patients with adenomyosis (n = 81) and healthy women (n = 231). Subsequently, implantation, biochemical and clinical miscarriage, and live birth rates between adenomyosis patients with one previous implantation failure using donor oocytes who received (n = 59) or did not receive (n = 66) PET based on endometrial receptivity, were observed to evaluate if adjusted progesterone improves reproductive outcomes of adenomyosis patients., Results: Patients with adenomyosis significantly presented an altered endometrial receptivity (non-receptive) compared with healthy patients (53.1% versus 37.2%, P = 0.0179), elevating the risk of adenomyosis patients having a non-receptive endometrium 42.59% higher (95% CI 41.50 to 44.45). No significant differences were found in implantation (62.7% versus 78.8%, P = 0.0514), biochemical (13.5% versus 3.9%, P = 0.1223) and clinical (10.8% versus 15.4%, P = 0.7543) miscarriage, or live birth rates (75.7% versus 80.8%, P = 0.6066), in patients with PET compared with those without PET., Conclusions: Women with adenomyosis presented an altered expression of genes involved in decidualization, and a higher rate of non-receptive endometrial statuses than controls. Although progesterone is indispensable for implantation, adjusting progesterone before PET, using endometrial transcriptomic signatures, does not improve IVF outcomes in patients with adenomyosis. Other molecular mechanisms beyond progesterone regulation may be involved in implantation failure., (Copyright © 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)