Search

Background: Prior studies suggest that histamines may modulate the development of colorectal neoplasia., Aim: To assess whether histamine receptor antagonist use was associated with adenoma formation., Methods: Patients (n = 2366) were drawn from three adenoma chemoprevention trials. All underwent baseline colonoscopy with removal of adenoma(s) and were deemed free of remaining lesions; they were followed with surveillance colonoscopy. Medication use was assessed by questionnaire. Adjusted risk ratios for adenoma formation related to histamine receptor antagonist use (histamine H1 and H2 receptor, H1RA and H2RA) were determined using log linear models., Results: In pooled analyses, H1RA exposure was not associated with subsequent adenoma risk (RR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.97-1.25) or multiple adenoma formation (RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.67-1.07). H2RA use also was not associated with adenoma (RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.77-1.06), or multiple adenoma (RR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.57-1.04) in the pooled analyses, but H2RA users in the first trial had a decreased risk of adenoma (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.48-1.03) and multiple adenoma (RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.79)., Conclusion: H2RA use was associated with reduced risk for adenoma in one trial, but not in the pooled analyses. Further study would be warranted before undertaking randomized trials of H2RAs for adenoma chemoprevention.

Although rectal mucosal labeling index is thought to be a useful surrogate biomarker for colorectal cancer, the ability of the index to predict future neoplasia is unclear. We obtained rectal mucosal biopsies from 333 participants of a randomized controlled chemoprevention trial of calcium supplementation to determine whether labeling index was correlated with concurrent or future colorectal neoplasms. Labeling index was measured using proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry. Adenomas were enumerated at the time of the biopsies (cross-sectional) and 3 years later (prospective). We used logistic regression to test for an association of adenoma occurrence with overall labeling index, the mean proliferative height, and labeling index in the upper 40% of colon crypts. In the cross-sectional analysis, we found indications that higher proliferation was associated with an increase in the prevalence of adenomas. The overall adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval) were 1.14 (0.90-1.45) per % crypt labeling index, OR 1.08 (0.99-1.19) for upper crypt proliferation, and OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12) for proliferative height. In contrast, individuals with higher labeling index at baseline were actually less likely to have adenomas in the prospective analyses: OR 0.80 (0.62-1.02) per % crypt labeling index, OR 0.86 (0.73-1.00) for upper crypt index, and OR 0.97 (0.93-1.01) for proliferative height. Proliferative index does not predict future colorectal neoplasia, although it may be weakly associated with the presence of current adenomas. These results have important implications for the design of future intervention studies. Although it may be attractive to include the measurement of intermediate markers in large controlled trials, until we have more confidence in their performance, we should rely on better proven and more reliable intermediates, such as adenomas.

Both body iron stores and dietary iron intake have been reported to increase risk of colorectal neoplasms. We assessed whether serum ferritin concentration was associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas among 733 individuals with baseline determinations of ferritin as part of a multicenter clinical trial of antioxidant supplements for adenoma prevention. All study participants had at least one adenoma removed within 3 months before enrollment, and 269 of them developed one or more adenomas between follow-up colonoscopies conducted 1 and 4 years after enrollment. Baseline serum ferritin concentrations were analyzed both as a log-transformed continuous variable and as a categorical variable, defined as whether iron stores were nonreplete and low (ferritin < or =30 microg/liter), nonreplete and borderline (31-70 microg/liter), replete and adequate (71-160 microg/liter), or replete and high (>160 microg/liter). Analyses were based on multiple logistic regression models, including age, sex, study center, energy, alcohol, fiber, folate, and total fat intake, number of months between colonoscopic examinations, smoking status, and aspirin use. Overall, there was no statistically significant linear association between log ferritin concentration and adenoma recurrence (P = 0.33). Risk of adenoma recurrence was modestly increased among participants with ferritin concentrations >70 microg/liter relative to those with lower ferritin (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.02). This result seemed more pronounced among women than men. Dietary intake of iron and red meat was inversely associated with adenoma recurrence among participants with replete iron stores but not consistently associated among those with nonreplete stores. Our findings suggest that any role of iron stores and dietary iron in influencing risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence is likely complex.

Background and Methods: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic evidence suggests that calcium may help prevent colorectal adenomas. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of supplementation with calcium carbonate on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 930 subjects (mean age, 61 years; 72 percent men) with a recent history of colorectal adenomas to receive either calcium carbonate (3 g [1200 mg of elemental calcium] daily) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects in whom at least one adenoma was detected after the first follow-up endoscopy but up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios for the recurrence of adenomas were adjusted for age, sex, lifetime number of adenomas before the study, clinical center, and length of the surveillance period., Results: The subjects in the calcium group had a lower risk of recurrent adenomas. Among the 913 subjects who underwent at least one study colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio for any recurrence of adenoma with calcium as compared with placebo was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.03). The main analysis was based on the 832 subjects (409 in the calcium group and 423 in the placebo group) who completed both follow-up examinations. At least one adenoma was diagnosed between the first and second follow-up endoscopies in 127 subjects in the calcium group (31 percent) and 159 subjects in the placebo group (38 percent); the adjusted risk ratio was 0.81 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.99; P=0.04). The adjusted ratio of the average number of adenomas in the calcium group to that in the placebo group was 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.96; P=0.02). The effect of calcium was independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake., Conclusions: Calcium supplementation is associated with a significant - though moderate - reduction in the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas.

Experimental and observational findings suggest that calcium intake may protect against colorectal neoplasia. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of colorectal adenoma recurrence. Nine hundred thirty patients with a recent history of colorectal adenomas were randomly given calcium carbonate (3 gm daily; 1200 mg elemental calcium) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The main analysis focused on new adenomas found after the first follow-up endoscopy, up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios of at least one recurrent adenoma and ratios of the average numbers of adenomas were calculated as measures of calcium effect. There was a lower risk of recurrent adenomas in subjects assigned calcium. Eight hundred thirty-two patients had two follow-up examinations and were included in the main analysis; the adjusted risk ratio of one or more adenomas was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99); the adjusted ratio of the average numbers of adenomas was 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.96). Among subjects who had at least one follow-up colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio of one or more recurrent adenomas was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.98). The effect of calcium seemed independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake. No toxicity was associated with supplementation. These findings indicate that calcium supplementation has a modest protective effect against colorectal adenomas, precursors of most colorectal cancers.

Background & Aims: All patients with colorectal adenomas may not require identical follow-up. We aimed to determine if adenoma characteristics at initial colonoscopy could predict adenoma recurrence or characteristics at follow-up., Methods: The number of adenomas and the size, type, and degree of atypia in 479 patients in a polyp prevention trial were evaluated as predictors of the same characteristics at follow-up using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if several baseline characteristics were simultaneously associated with outcome., Results: Although several characteristics were significant predictors of recurrence univariately, by multivariate analysis, multiple adenomas at follow-up were more likely when patients had > or = 3 baseline adenomas (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.20-4.21) or at least 1 tubulovillous adenoma (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.12-4.02). No specific characteristic was associated with recurrence of high-risk polyps (> or = 1 cm, villous, severe atypia). Seventy percent of patients with 1 or 2 baseline adenomas had no recurrence, and only 3.3% had any adenomas of clinical concern., Conclusions: Number and type of baseline adenomas predict recurrent adenomas, but the recurrence is rarely of clinical concern. Patients with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas constitute a low-risk group for whom follow-up might be extended beyond 3 years.

The association between calcium intake and the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains controversial. This analysis prospectively investigated the association between dietary and supplemental calcium intake and recurrent colorectal adenomas. Participants were part of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins. The study endpoints were adenomas detected between surveillance colonoscopies conducted at approximately 1 year and 4 years after study entry. Baseline intake of energy-adjusted calcium derived from a food frequency questionnaire was used as the main exposure of interest. Calcium supplement use was assessed by semiannual questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence limits, and Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios. Subjects in the fifth quintile of dietary calcium had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.22) compared to those in the lowest quintile. Investigation of the numbers of adenomas yielded stronger findings: the rate ratio for the fifth quintile versus the first was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.02). Dietary calcium seemed to have a greater effect among individuals with a high-fat diet than among those with a low-fat diet; however, the interaction was not statistically significant. Use of calcium supplements was not related to adenoma recurrence. These results suggest that a high calcium intake may be associated with a reduction in risk of recurrent adenomas, especially among individuals on a high-fat diet.

Background: Recent evidence suggests that folic acid (and derivatives) could contribute to the protective effect of fruits and vegetables against the risk of large-bowel cancer. Other evidence indicates that alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking may impair the biologic actions of folate. We used data from an adenoma prevention trial to investigate the occurrence of colorectal adenomas (possible precursors of colorectal cancer) in association with folate intake, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking., Methods: Patients with at least one recent large-bowel adenoma were followed with colonoscopy 1 year and 4 years after their qualifying colon examinations. Adenomas detected after the year 1 examination were used as end points. A food-frequency questionnaire was administered at study entry and at study completion; nutrient intake at study entry was used in this analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: After adjustment for caloric intake, dietary folate had a significant protective association with the risk of recurrence of large-bowel adenoma (P for trend = .04). However, this inverse association was attenuated by further adjustment for intake of dietary fiber and fat. Use of folate supplements was not associated with a reduction in risk. Alcohol intake (seven or more drinks/week) was associated with increased risk (odds ratio = 2.04; 95% confidence interval = 1.28-3.26). Cigarette smoking, even smoking for long duration, was not related to adenoma recurrence., Conclusions: These data provide only modest support for previous findings suggesting beneficial effects of folate on colorectal adenoma risk. We find no evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk. These findings do suggest a substantial increase in risk with alcohol consumption.

Previous research suggests that iron acts as a prooxidant to increase the risk of colorectal neoplasia. This study examined effects of dietary intake of iron on colorectal adenoma recurrence using data from an antioxidant clinical trial. All subjects were free of polyps at study entry but had at least one adenoma removed within the 3 months before enrollment. Follow-up colonoscopies were conducted after 1 and 4 years. Patients who developed one or more adenomatous polyps between years 1 and 4 were classified as cases; all others were controls. Dietary iron intake at baseline and at the end of the study was estimated from self-administered food frequency questionnaires and averaged together for each subject, energy-adjusted, and categorized into quartiles. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, center, sex, calories, treatment group, and alcohol, fiber, folate, and fat intakes in unconditional logistic regression analysis. Dietary iron was inversely associated with adenoma risk, although risk did not decrease monotonically with increasing intake. Odds ratios comparing second, third, and fourth quartiles to the lowest quartile were 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-1.02], 0.80 (95% CI, 0.45-1.44), and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.19-0.73), respectively. A limited examination showed no clear evidence that use of iron supplements affected risk of recurrence in this study population. This study provides evidence against the hypothesis that recent dietary intake of iron increases risk for colorectal adenomas. However, these results may reflect the presence of other dietary factors found in combination with iron.

Consumption of coffee has been associated with a reduction in the risk of cancer of the colon, and (less consistently) drinking tea has been associated with a reduction in the risk of rectal cancer. The effect of these beverages on the risk of colorectal adenomas, however, has not been well investigated. We used data from an adenoma prevention trial to investigate these associations. Patients with at least one recent large bowel adenoma were followed with colonoscopy 1 and 4 years after their qualifying examinations. Adenomas detected at the year 4 colonoscopy were used as end points. A food frequency questionnaire was administered at study entry and study completion; average intake over the study period was used to estimate the exposures of interest. There was no apparent association between the intake of regular coffee, decaffeinated coffee, or tea and the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas. The relative risks and 95% confidence intervals per cup daily were 0.96 (0.87-1.05) for regular coffee, 0.97 (0.84-1.12) for decaffeinated coffee, and 1.02 (0.83-1.25) for tea. These negative findings were present both overall and for adenomas of the right and left large bowel.

In many large bowel chemoprevention trials adenomas have a double duty: they are used to identify subjects at risk for large bowel neoplasia, and also serve as endpoints. Many features of adenomas make them suitable for these tasks. Patients with adenomas are fairly numerous and easy to identify; further, the 'adenoma-carcinoma' sequence suggests that adenomas are logical endpoints. The high recurrence risk among adenoma patients means that a relatively modest number of subjects will suffice for adequate statistical power. The are some limitations to the use of adenomas, however. There is clearly heterogeneity of risk for subsequent cancer. Patients with only small adenomas may have rates of colorectal cancer that are not much greater than those of the general population. Certainly subjects with large adenomas, and those with villous or highly dysplastic adenomas have a higher risk. Often, one would chose the high-risk patients for preventive interventions. Such a strategy makes sense from a risk-benefit point of view. However, from a population perspective, such a strategy may well have only a minor impact on the overall colorectal cancer burden. For more complete population-based prevention, efforts will have to be directed to the numerous individuals who are each at small risk, but who collectively account for most colorectal cancer. For this preventive approach, patients with any adenoma would certainly be part of the target population, and so are sensible subjects in chemoprevention trials. There are similar complexities in consideration of the use of adenomas as endpoints of chemoprevention trials. The adenomas that occur in prevention trials are generally small, and may not be associated with a greatly increased cancer risk. The issue for chemoprevention trials however, is not whether the endpoints are truly intermediate in the causal chain-but whether the intervention under study alters the adenoma recurrence risk to the same extent as it does for colorectal cancer risk. This is a difficult matter to verify, but the limited data available are encouraging. The epidemiology of colorectal adenomas (largely small adenomas) is similar in many regards to that for colorectal cancer itself. Thus to the extent that data are available, one can tentatively conclude that external influences affect adenomas and colorectal cancer similarly. To date, more than ten adenoma prevention trials have reported results. The data have been fairly consistent. Vitamin C (with or without vitamin E) has provided at most a modest protective benefit, except in one small trial in which it was combined with vitamin E and preformed vitamin A. beta-Carotene seems to be without any effect, and interventions to increase fiber and decrease fat intake have not indicated substantial effects. On the other hand, trials among familial polyposis patients have provided evidence for an impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Studies in progress have the potential to clarify greatly the preventive potential of the currently promising-but yet unproven-chemopreventive regimens.

Background: Data from studies using rodents suggest that dietary calcium inhibits bile acid-induced mucosal damage and experimental carcinogenesis in the large bowel. However, in humans, the effect of dietary calcium and calcium supplementation on proliferation and carcinogenesis in the large bowel has been unclear., Purpose: To assess the effect of calcium supplementation on rectal mucosal proliferation in humans, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial., Methods: Participants were part of a larger multicenter chemoprevention trial; all were at high risk for large-bowel neoplasia, with at least one large-bowel adenoma removed endoscopically within the 3 months before study entry but with no known polyps remaining. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily either 3000 mg of calcium carbonate (providing 1200 mg elemental calcium) or an identical-appearing placebo tablet. During a scheduled endoscopy 6-9 months after random assignment (approximately 1 year after the qualifying endoscopy), rectal mucosal samples were obtained from 333 patients (173 assigned to calcium and 160 assigned to placebo). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling indices (LIs) were computed as the measure of proliferation in specimens from 146 patients receiving calcium and 129 patients receiving placebo. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling was used to measure proliferation in a smaller number of specimens (27 calcium-receiving and 31 placebo-receiving participants). For each scorable crypt having at least one labeled cell (or surrounded by crypts with at least one labeled cell), a crypt LI was calculated as the number of labeled cells divided by the total number of crypt cells. Crypt LIs were averaged to produce a participant's average LI., Results: The overall unadjusted mean PCNA LIs (+/- SE) were similar in the calcium and placebo groups (3.85% +/- 0.08% versus 3.92% +/- 0.08%, respectively, P = .30). The overall unadjusted mean BrdU LIs (+/- SE) were 3.88% +/- 0.30% in the calcium group and 3.54% +/- 0.21% in the placebo group (P = .54). PCNA labeling indices in the most luminal 40% of the crypt were small but, if anything, were higher in the calcium group. There was no patient subgroup within which calcium had an antiproliferative effect; the overall findings persisted among patients with high and low calcium intake, high and low fat intake, and high and low fiber intake., Conclusions: Calcium supplementation does not decrease rectal mucosal proliferation, as measured by PCNA (and BrdU) immunohistochemistry, in patients with previous large-bowel adenomas. This study, therefore, does not provide evidence for an anticarcinogenic effect of calcium.

Background: Epidemiological studies have indicated that aspirin consumption can lower the risk of large-bowel cancer. These studies are not entirely consistent, however, and their interpretation has been complicated by the possibility that cancer symptoms may have led patients to avoid aspirin or that aspirin may have influenced cancer diagnosis and treatment., Purpose: Our purpose was to determine the effect of aspirin on risk of large-bowel neoplasms in a study in which aspirin use would not be expected to affect tumor detection and tumor-related symptoms would not likely influence aspirin use. A less complicated assessment of the relationship between aspirin and large-bowel tumors should thus be possible., Methods: We studied 793 patients enrolled in a clinical trial of nutrient supplements to prevent large-bowel adenomas. Unlike invasive cancers, adenomas usually do not cause symptoms or detectable gastrointestinal bleeding; thus, adenomas are unlikely to influence aspirin use. Each patient had at least one large-bowel adenoma diagnosed and removed shortly before study entry and had been judged to be free of further tumors by colonoscopy. Use of aspirin was assessed by responses on questionnaires administered 6 and 12 months after enrollment. We performed complete colonoscopies on all patients 1 year after they entered the study and removed all polyps., Results: Patients who reported taking aspirin on both questionnaires (consistent users) had a lower risk of new adenomas at their 1-year follow-up colonoscopy (odds ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.31-0.89) compared with patients who did not report using aspirin on either of the questionnaires. The apparent protective effect of consistent aspirin use was present among both men and women and did not appear to be influenced by the number of prior adenomas., Conclusions: These data further support the hypothesis that aspirin has an antineoplastic effect in the large bowel. Nevertheless, the question of whether aspirin should be used to prevent large-bowel tumors would be best answered by a randomized controlled clinical trial specifically designed to address this issue.

Summary: Background: Aspirin may reduce the risk of several types of cancer. Objectives: To evaluate if folic acid is associated with risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Methods: BCC incidence was evaluated in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of aspirin (81 mg daily or 325 mg daily for ~3 years) and/or folic acid (1 mg daily for ~6 years) for the prevention of colorectal adenomas among 1121 participants with a previous adenoma. BCC was confirmed by blinded review of pathology reports. Results: One hundred and four of 958 non‐Hispanic white participants were diagnosed with BCC over a median follow‐up of 13·5 years. Cumulative incidence of BCC was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7–17] for placebo, 16% (95% CI 11–21) for 81 mg aspirin daily and 15% (95% CI 10–20) for 325 mg aspirin daily [hazard ratio (HR) for any aspirin 1·45 (95% CI 0·93–2·26); HR for 81 mg daily 1·57 (95% CI 0·96–2·56); HR for 325 mg daily 1·33 (95% CI 0·80–2·20)]. BCC risk was higher with aspirin use in those without previous skin cancer but lower with aspirin use in those with previous skin cancer (Pinteraction = 0·02 for 81 mg aspirin daily; Pinteraction = 0·03 for 325 mg aspirin daily). Folic acid supplementation was unrelated to BCC incidence (HR 0·85; 95% CI 0·57–1·27). Conclusions: Neither aspirin nor folic acid treatment had a statistically significant effect on risk of BCC. Subgroup analysis suggested that chemopreventive effects of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs may be specific to those at high risk for BCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "Aspirin prevented new colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer" is presented.