Search

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the utility of radiomics features in differentiating CT cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from normal pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective case-control study, 190 patients with PDAC (97 men, 93 women; mean age ± SD, 66 ± 9 years) from 2012 to 2017 and 190 healthy potential renal donors (96 men, 94 women; mean age ± SD, 52 ± 8 years) without known pancreatic disease from 2005 to 2009 were identified from radiology and pathology databases. The 3D volume of the pancreas was manually segmented from the preoperative CT scans by four trained researchers and verified by three abdominal radiologists. Four hundred seventy-eight radiomics features were extracted to express the phenotype of the pancreas. Forty features were selected for analysis because of redundancy of computed features. The dataset was divided into 255 training cases (125 normal control cases and 130 PDAC cases) and 125 validation cases (65 normal control cases and 60 PDAC cases). A random forest classifier was used for binary classification of PDAC versus normal pancreas of control cases. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. RESULTS. Mean tumor size was 4.1 ± 1.7 (SD) cm. The overall accuracy of the random forest binary classification was 99.2% (124/125), and AUC was 99.9%. All PDAC cases (60/60) were correctly classified. One case from a renal donor was misclassified as PDAC (1/65). The sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 98.5%. CONCLUSION. Radiomics features extracted from whole pancreas can be used to differentiate between CT cases from patients with PDAC and healthy control subjects with normal pancreas.

Men treated for prostate cancer often have unexpected outcomes despite predictive models based on stage, grade and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Previous results have indicated that nuclear morphometry can predict patient outcome in urologic malignancies. Application of this analytical method in prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy is limited. We have evaluated the predictive ability of nuclear morphometry in such patients. Histologic sections from 23 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with radiation therapy were studied. Nuclear morphometric parameters were assessed using a previously described and validated system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the ability of nuclear morphometric parameters to predict recurrence and disease-free interval. Ten patients had no recurrence with median follow-up of 47. 5 months, while 13 had recurrence. Gleason grade was not predictive of treatment outcome. Pre-treatment PSA data, available for only 11 patients, were predictive of treatment outcome. Several nuclear morphometric parameters predicted recurrence, including upper quartile of suboptimal circle fit and upper quartile of feret-diameter ratio. A prognostic factor score incorporating these 2 parameters was derived, which predicted disease-free interval (p = 0.0014). Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:594-597, 1999., (Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Forty-three patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and available partners were interviewed to assess qualitatively and quantitatively their levels of sexual functioning prior to radiotherapy. The mean age was 67.7 years (58-80 years). The Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning (DISF) was the evaluation used. The Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning measures five domains of sexual functioning: sexual fantasy, arousal, experience, orgasm, and drive. Twenty-seven of the 43 (62.7%) patients evaluated were considered impotent. Fifteen of the 27 patients scored low in all five domains of sexual functioning even though they could achieve erection but they were unable to maintain erection throughout the phases of the sexual response cycle. Twelve of the 27 patients had scored 0 on sexual arousal and orgasm, thus had no ability for erection. Sixteen of the 43 (37.2%) patients were considered potent. This group of patients had achieved erection throughout the phases of sexual cycle and scored adequately in all five domains of sexual functioning. Patients with DISF score less than 20 were impotent. Those with a Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning score of greater than 45 were potent. Only 6 of 19 patients with scores between 20 and 45 were potent. The Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning score was highly prognostic for impotence, (p = .002) was easy to use and could be used for follow-up of the effect of therapy on sexual function in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients who present for radiation therapy are older, 50% are on cardiac or antihypertensive medication, and the majority (62.7%) are already impotent prior to therapy.

Twenty-seven patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, and available partners, were interviewed to qualitatively and quantitatively assess their level of sexual function prior to and 12 months after radiotherapy. Assessments were made using the Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning (DISF). Five domains of sexual functioning are measured: sexual fantasy, arousal, experience, orgasm, and drive. Prior to therapy 17 of 27 patients (62.9%) were considered impotent. There were eight patients with a DISF score of less than 20 who were impotent. Six patients had a DISF score of greater than 47 and were considered potent. Of the patients with DISF scores between 20-47 four were potent, and nine were impotent. Post radiation therapy three of the patients considered potent (with a score greater than 47) maintained their potent status. Four patients considered impotent prior to therapy became potent after therapy. All patients with a score less than 20 prior to radiation therapy remained impotent after therapy. Results indicate that an objective evaluation of sexual function pre treatment is necessary to determine the effect of radiotherapy. Our method of qualitative assessment of sexual function was easy to implement, was reproducible and could be used to evaluate long-term effects of radiotherapy on sexual function. Of the patients presenting for radiotherapy, 62.9% were impotent. Twelve months after radiation therapy 19 of 27 (70.3%) were impotent.