Search

Barrett's Oesophagus (BO) is a complication of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and is a major risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Current guidelines are based on data showing a 0.5% annual malignancy progression rate. The Polish Barrett's Oesophagus Registry (POBOR) was established to characterize Polish patients with BO and estimate the risk of malignant progression. POBOR was established in 1999 after a dedicated training of endoscopists and histopathologists. Physicians registered patients using a dedicated registry form. After excluding patients known to have endoscopic treatment for BO, follow-up <1 year and adenocarcinoma found at index endoscopy we have linked patients personal identification numbers (PESEL) with the National Cancer Registry to identify those with a diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. In total, 843 patients were registered [609 men (72.2%), male to female ratio 2.6:1] with median age at diagnosis of 56 years (IQR:47-67). Long segment BE was found at index endoscopy in 294 patients (39.4%) whereas low grade dysplasia in 147 (17.4%). 112 patients (13.3%) fulfilled the exclusion criteria and the remaining 731 were followed for a median of 9.8 years (IQR: 9.3-10.0). After 6779 patient-years, 6 adenocarcinomas were diagnosed yielding an incidence rate of 0.89 per 1000 patients-years (95% confidence interval [CI 0.40-1.97]) which corresponds to annual malignancy progression rate of less than 0.1%. The malignancy rate in patients with low grade dysplasia was 3.70 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 1.39-9.85). In Polish BO patients the risk of malignant progression was lower than previously reported. It was notably higher in patients with low grade dysplasia than in those with no dysplasia at index endoscopy, which may warrant strict surveillance in these patients., (© 2016 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background and Study Aims: Endosonography (EUS) has been shown to be more accurate than incremental computed tomography (CT) in the local (T) and regional (N) staging of gastric carcinoma; however, EUS has never been compared with helical CT (HCT). The fifth edition of the TNM classification changed the guidelines for N-staging of gastric carcinoma. The accuracy of imaging methods in this new system remains unknown., Patients and Methods: Staging accuracy of EUS and HCT were compared prospectively with pathological or intraoperative findings in 88 gastric carcinoma patients. Staging was done according to the fourth and fifth editions of the TNM classification. EUS was done with a radial echo endoscope, and HCT with a scanner with two rows of detectors (two-phase contrast-enhanced scanning of a water-filled stomach)., Results: The T-staging accuracy of EUS (63 %, CI 52 - 73 %) was superior to the accuracy of HCT (44 %, CI 34 - 55 %; P = 0.021). N-staging accuracy of both methods was similar when the fourth edition of the TNM classification was used (EUS 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; HCT 52 %, CI 38 - 65 %). However, HCT was more accurate than EUS when the fifth edition of the classification was applied (EUS 30 %, CI 18 - 43 %, HCT 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; P = 0.044). The accuracy of detection of lymph node metastases was similar for both methods (EUS 67 %, CI 54 - 78 %; HCT 77 %, CI 64 - 86 %)., Conclusions: EUS is more accurate than HCT in the T-staging of gastric carcinoma. Both methods are comparable for N-staging, when this is done according to the older, fourth edition of the TNM classification. If the fifth edition is used, EUS is less accurate than HCT.