Search

Introduction: Although surgical resection is necessary, it is not sufficient for long-term survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We sought to evaluate survival after up-front surgery (UFS) in anatomically resectable PDAC in the context of three critical factors: (A) margin status; (B) CA19-9; and (C) receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy., Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2010-2015) was reviewed for clinically resectable (stage 0/I/II) PDAC patients. Surgical margins, pre-operative CA19-9, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated. Patient overall survival was stratified based on these factors and their respective combinations. Outcomes after UFS were compared to equivalently staged patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis., Results: Twelve thousand and eighty-nine patients were included (n = 9197 UFS, n = 2892 ITT neoadjuvant). In the UFS cohort, only 20.4% had all three factors (median OS = 31.2 months). Nearly 1/3rd (32.7%) of UFS patients had none or only one factor with concomitant worst survival (median OS = 14.7 months). Survival after UFS decreased with each failing factor (two factors: 23 months, one factor: 15.5 months, no factors: 7.9 months) and this persisted after adjustment. Overall survival was superior in the ITT-neoadjuvant cohort (27.9 vs. 22 months) to UFS., Conclusion: Despite the perceived benefit of UFS, only 1-in-5 UFS patients actually realize maximal survival when known factors highly associated with outcomes are assessed. Patients are proportionally more likely to do worst, rather than best after UFS treatment. Similarly staged patients undergoing ITT-neoadjuvant therapy achieve survival superior to the majority of UFS patients. Patients and providers should be aware of the false perception of 'optimal' survival benefit with UFS in anatomically resectable PDAC., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Fukuoka consensus guidelines classify pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) presumed to be intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) into Fukuoka positive (FP) (subgroups of high-risk (HR) and worrisome features (WFs)) and Fukuoka negative (FN) (non-HR feature/WF cysts). We retrospectively estimated 5-year risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in FN, WF and HR cysts of patients with PCL-IPMN., Design: From Mayo Clinic databases, we randomly selected 2000 patients reported to have a PCL; we excluded inflammatory or suspected non-IPMN cysts and those without imaging follow-up. We re-reviewed cross-sectional imaging and abstracted clinical and follow-up data on PCL-IPMNs. The study contained 802 patients with FN cysts and 358 with FP cysts., Results: Patients with PCL-IPMN had median (IQR) follow-up of 4.2 (1.8-7.1) years. Among FN cysts, 5-year PC risk was low (2-3%) regardless of cyst size (p=0.67). After excluding events in the first 6 months, 5-year PC risk remained low (0-2%) regardless of cyst size (p=0.61). Among FP cysts, HR cysts (n=66) had greater 5-year PC risk than WF cysts (n=292) (49.7% vs 4.1%; p<0.001). In HR cysts, 3-year PC risk was greatest for obstructive jaundice versus enhancing solid component or main pancreatic duct >10 mm (79.8% vs 37.3% vs 39.4%, respectively; p=0.01)., Conclusions: Fukuoka guidelines accurately stratify PCL-IPMNs for PC risk, with FN cysts having lowest and HR cysts having greatest risk. After 6-month follow-up, WF and FN cysts had a low 5-year PC risk. Surveillance strategies should be tailored appropriately., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Background and Aims: Malignant vascular invasion usually results from gross direct infiltration from a primary tumor and impacts cancer staging, prognosis, and therapy. However, patients may also develop a remote malignant thrombi (RMT), defined as a malignant intravascular thrombus located remote and noncontiguous to the primary tumor. Our aim was to compare EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of RMT and to explore the potential impact on cancer staging., Methods: Patients with RMT were identified from a prospectively maintained EUS database. Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain EUS, CT/MRI, clinical, and outcome data., Results: A median of 3 FNAs (range, 1-8) was obtained from RMT in 17 patients (60 ± 14.1 years, 56% men) between April 2003 and August 2016, with the finding of malignant cytology in 12 patients (70.6%; 10 positive, 2 suspicious). CT/MRI detected the RMT in 5 patients (29.4%), 4 of whom had positive or suspicious EUS-FNA cytology. Among the 8 newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) patients, CT did not detect the RMT in 5 (63%), of whom 3 patients had positive or suspicious intravascular EUS-FNA cytology. For newly diagnosed PaC patients (n = 8), the EUS-FNA diagnosis of a biopsy specimen-proven RMT upstaged 3 patients (37.5%) and converted 2 patients (25%) from CT resectable to unresectable disease. No adverse events were reported. The mean follow-up was 18.9 ± 27.7 months., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the ability and potential safety of intravascular FNA to detect radiographically occult RMT, which substantially impacts cancer staging and resectability., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma, defined as the simultaneous presence of 2 or more newly identified and anatomically separate primary adenocarcinomas within the pancreas, is reported rarely. We compared endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings from patients with synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma and their effects on cancer staging and treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis of the EUS database at the Mayo Clinic, from September 2008 through May 2016, to collect EUS, CT, MRI, and clinical data from patients with synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EUS and separate fine-needle aspiration of both tumors detected synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 11 patients (70.9 ± 10.4 y; 64% men). Of the 22 cancers, CT (n = 9) and MRI (n = 2) detected 9 (41%) cancers; in only 2 patients did CT detect both cancers. EUS increased cancer stage for 7 of the 11 (64%) patients and changed the status from resectable to unresectable for 3 of the 9 (33%) patients, compared with CT or MRI. EUS findings altered the likely extent of surgical resection for 3 patients. Synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma is reported rarely and may be undetected by CT or MRI; this could account for the false presumption of early tumor recurrence, rather than actual residual second tumor, leading to incomplete resection., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) often produces pain that is difficult to control. Celiac neurolysis (CN) is performed with the goal of improving pain control and quality of life while reducing opioid-related side effects., Objective: We aimed to evaluate whether CN provides a survival advantage for PC patients., Design: Retrospective case-control study., Setting: Single tertiary-care referral center., Patients: Review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with unresectable PC who underwent CN over a 12-year period. Each patient was matched to 2 control patients with unresectable PC., Intervention: CN, which included both celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac ganglia neurolysis (CGN)., Main Outcome Measurements: Median survival in Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios., Results: A total of 417 patients underwent CN and were compared with 840 controls with PC. Baseline characteristics were similar except the CN group had greater weight loss and pain requiring opioids. A mean of 16.6 ± 5.8 mL of alcohol was administered. For patients who underwent CN, the median survival from the time of presentation was shorter compared with controls (193 vs 246 days; hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.54). There was no difference in survival with unilateral or bilateral injection. However, EUS-guided CN was associated with longer survival compared with non-EUS approaches, and those who received CPN had longer survival compared with CGN., Limitations: Single center, retrospective., Conclusion: Our study suggests that CN is an independent predictor of shortened survival in PC patients. A prospective study is needed to verify the findings and determine whether shortened survival results from CN or from other features such as performance status and tumor-related characteristics. It is also imperative to verify our finding that EUS-guided CN provides a survival advantage over other approaches and whether CPN prolongs survival compared with CGN., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)