Search

Objective: To establish an optimal adjuvant therapy for intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients, we conducted a multi-center randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy (PRT) versus cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy in women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma with deeper than 50% myometrial invasion., Methods: Among 385 evaluated patients, 193 patients received PRT and 192 received CAP. The PRT group received at least 40 Gy. The CAP group received cyclophosphamide (333 mg/m2), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2) every 4 weeks for 3 or more courses., Results: No statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed. The 5-year PFS rates in the PRT and CAP groups were 83.5% and 81.8% respectively, while the 5-year OS rates were 85.3% and 86.7% respectively. These rates were also not significantly different in a low- to intermediate-risk group defined as stage IC patients under 70 years old with G1/2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, among 120 patients in a high- to intermediate-risk group defined as (1) stage IC in patients over 70 years old or with G3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma or (2) stage II or IIIA (positive cytology), the CAP group had a significantly higher PFS rate (83.8% vs. 66.2%, log-rank test P=0.024, hazard ratio 0.44) and higher OS rate (89.7% vs. 73.6%, log-rank test P=0.006, hazard ratio 0.24). Adverse effects were not significantly increased in the CAP group versus the PRT group., Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy may be a useful alternative to radiotherapy for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.

The differential diagnosis of endocervical glandular lesions can be very difficult, and the interobserver agreement on borderline cases can be low. We are proposing a new scoring system to aid in the reproducibility of the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions. The total of 67 diagnostically difficult cases were independently reviewed by five pathologists. After the completion of the first round review, a consensus diagnosis was reached for each lesion by all participants. This consensus diagnosis was used as the reference diagnosis. According to the consensus, the lesions included 21 benign/reactive conditions, 7 endocervical glandular dysplasias, and 39 adenocarcinomas in situ. During the second round review, all cases were assessed using the new scoring scheme, according to which separate scores from 0 to 3 were given to each lesion for: 1) nuclear atypia, 2) stratification, and 3) sum of mitoses/apoptoses (counted in the two most active glands, and the average number used). These three scores were then added to result in the total score (0-3 = benign; 4-5 = endocervical glandular dysplasia; 6-9 = adenocarcinoma in situ). Complete agreement between all observers in the first round review was seen in 35 of 67 cases (52.2%), kappa = 0.565. This agreement improved in the second round with the use of the scoring scheme: 52 of 67 cases (77.6%), kappa = 0.705. If the benign and endocervical glandular dysplasia diagnostic categories were combined, the overall agreement in the second round review would be 63 of 67 cases (94%), meaning that the scheme affords accurate distinction between adenocarcinoma in situ and lesser lesions. We propose applying this new scoring scheme to the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions to improve interobserver agreement. The use of this scheme will result in more consistency of data in series from different institutions and will allow uniformity on the issue of adenocarcinoma in situ precursor lesions.

The insufficient state of knowledge concerning the biology of endocervical glandular lesions is compounded by the lack of universal diagnostic criteria for recognizing endocervical glandular dysplasia. This study addressed the issue of diagnostic reproducibility of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions and tested the proposed new scoring scheme designed to improve this reproducibility. We have shown that the application of this scheme has significantly improved interobserver agreement in all diagnostic categories. Moreover, the results of this study lend support to the recommendation not to diagnose endocervical glandular dysplasia in the clinical setting, although this category can be still reliably separated out for research purposes. Application of our scoring scheme will bring uniformity to the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions and allow the study of a precursor to endocervical adenocarcinoma

A 32-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed as having stage Ib1 adenocarcinoma by diagnostic laser conization at a local hospital. She was admitted to our hospital for fertility-sparing treatment. A radical trachelectomy (RT) was performed using the laparoscopic vaginal procedure. The procedure was started with a laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the lymph nodes were tumor free, RT was carried out transvaginally. The excised uterine cervix and lymph nodes were pathologically negative for cancer. Eight months after the operation, the patient became pregnant without any artificial reproduction techniques. At 17 weeks of gestation, she was admitted to our hospital again for a threatened abortion. Continuous tocolytic treatment with ritodrine and daily administration of a granulocyte elastase inhibitor vaginal suppository were given. At 32 weeks of gestation, she underwent emergency cesarean section because of sudden premature rupture of the membranes. A girl weighing 1991 g was delivered, with Apgar scores of 7 and 8 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Both the mother and the baby were discharged without trouble. This is the first successful case in Japan of delivery after vaginal RT for invasive uterine cervical cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To determine the current status of postoperative management of endometrial cancer in Japan by surveying members of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG). Method: We conducted an original mail survey regarding the status of postoperative treatment including indication criteria, treatment procedures, and chemotherapeutic regimen among all 226 active member institutions of the JGOG. Results: A total of 199 institutions (88.1%) responded to the survey. A total of 4063 patients with endometrial cancer were treated at the member institutions of the JGOG over a year. As adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy (79.9%) was significantly (p <0.01) preferred over radiotherapy (13.0%) or hormonal therapy (7.1%). Furthermore, more than 50% of respondent institutions performed adjuvant therapy when patients exhibited International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB/G3/positive lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI)/endometrioid adenocarcinoma or FIGO IB/G3/non-endometrioid histology, and more than 90% institutions administered adjuvant therapy when patients exhibited FIGO IC/G3/positive LVSI/endometrioid adenocarcinoma or FIGO stage IC/G3/regardless of LVSI/non-endometrioid histology. A combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin was the most preferred first-line regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy followed by combination regimens consisting of anthracycline and platinum. Conclusion: The present survey provides relevant information regarding the current status of adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]