Search

Background: Young-onset gastrointestinal malignancies appear to be increasing in incidence. There are limited data on young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA)., Methods: The study comprised patients with PBA (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intra-, and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2017. YO-PBA was defined as a diagnosis at age less than 50 years. Logistic regression to assess factors associated with YO-PBA status, and cox proportional hazards modeling to associate relevant factors with overall survival was performed., Results: The study cohort comprised 360,764 patients, with 20,822 (5.8%) YO-PBA. YO-PBA was associated with (p-values<0.0001 for all): male sex (6.3% YO-male out of all male patients vs. 5.2% YO-female, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33), Black race (7.9% YO-Black vs. 5.0% YO-White, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.64-1.80), lower income (6.4% YO-lowest household income based group vs. 5.5% highest, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13). YO-PBA were more likely to present with stage-IV disease (6.4% YO-Stage IV of all stage IV vs. 5.4% YO-Stage I-III, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.29 p-value < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) in non-operable patients included-sex - male vs. female, HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.15); race - Black vs. White, HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.42); income group - lowest vs. highest, HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.27-1.39), and treatment center type - academic vs. nonacademic center, HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90)., Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors significantly impact incidence and outcomes for young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). More work is needed to help understand the mechanisms involved while addressing the disparities., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: There is no standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and the prognosis remains poor. Our institution conducted a phase I study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine given in a novel, weekly schedule. The regimen was tolerated; pharmacodynamic studies revealed no drug interactions, and there was one confirmed response in a gastric cancer patient. We performed a phase II trial in advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma to determine response rate and response duration., Methods: This was a multi-center single treatment arm study involving six sites. Only prior adjuvant therapy was allowed. Patients had ECOG performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and were able to tolerate oral medications. All patients received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) and irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) IV weekly times 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period. Capecitabine 450 mg bid orally was received on days 1 through 5 every week for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. Patients were assessed for response after the first two cycles; response duration, overall survival, and adverse events were also recorded. We estimated an improvement in historical response rate by 30% would have clinical meaning., Results: A total of 39 patients were accrued and all were assessed for toxicity; 30 patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 57.8 years (31-79 years) and 74% were male. Two patients had a complete response, with nine patients achieving a partial response. The total response rate was 28%, with nine patients not evaluable for response. The median response duration was noted at 5.97 months and median overall survival was 8.98 months. There were no grade 5 treatment related events, with all deaths secondary to disease progression. Only five grade 4 events occurred (neutropenia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia (2), thrombosis/embolism) without grade 4 diarrhea or sensory neuropathy., Conclusions: Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine given in a novel, weekly schedule does induce responses in advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. However, the total response rate is modest and not an improvement over other regimens.

Background: CI-994, an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, has antineoplastic activity and synergism with gemcitabine preclinically. This randomized phase II trial explored whether CI-994 plus gemcitabine improves overall survival, objective response, duration of response, time to treatment failure and change in quality of life (QoL) or pain compared with gemcitabine alone., Patients and Methods: A total of 174 patients received CG (CI-994 6 mg/m(2)/day days 1-21 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15 each 28-day cycle) or PG (placebo plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle days 1-21)., Results: Median survival was 194 days (CG) versus 214 days (PG) (P = 0.908). The objective response rate with CG was 12% versus 14% with PG when investigator-assessed and 1% versus 6%, respectively, when assessed centrally. Time to treatment failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.304). QoL scores at 2 months were worse with CG than with PG. Pain response rates were similar between the two groups. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with CG., Conclusions: Adding CI-994 to gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic carcinoma does not improve overall survival, response rate or time to progression; CG produced decreased QoL and increased hematological toxicity and appears inferior to single-agent gemcitabine.