Search

Lung cancer encompasses multiple malignant epithelial tumour types, each with specific targetable, potentially actionable mutations, such that precision management mandates accurate tumour typing. Molecular characterisation studies require high tumour cell content and low necrosis content, yet lung cancers are frequently a heterogeneous mixture of tumour and stromal cells. We hypothesised that there may be systematic differences in tumour cell content according to histological subtype, and that this may have implications for tumour banks as a resource for comprehensive molecular characterisation studies in lung cancer. To investigate this, we estimated tumour cell and necrosis content of 4267 samples resected from 752 primary lung tumour specimens contributed to a lung tissue bank. We found that banked lung cancer samples had low tumour cell content (33%) generally, although it was higher in carcinoids (77.5%) than other lung cancer subtypes. Tumour cells comprise a variable and often small component of banked resected tumour samples, and are accompanied by stromal reaction, inflammation, fibrosis, and normal structures. This has implications for the adequacy of unselected tumour bank samples for diagnostic and molecular investigations, and further research is needed to determine whether tumour cell content has a significant impact on analytical results in studies using tissue from tumour bank resources., (Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We investigated whether a group of pathologists could reproducibly apply the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) classification for lung adenocarcinoma to a cohort of stage 1 tumors and whether this architectural classification and/or other parameters could demonstrate survival advantage., Methods: A total of 145 cases of 7 edition of tumor, node, metastasis stage 1 adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed for predominant architectural pattern, including cribriform pattern, nuclear grade, mitotic index, and necrosis. The parameters were assessed for reproducibility and survival and using multivariate analysis, compared with stage, age, and sex., Results: The majority of tumors had a mixed architecture with the acinar pattern being the most common predominant architecture. Micropapillary and cribriform architecture were the least frequent patterns. This study demonstrated that a group of five pathologists could reproducibly apply the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. Although there were insufficient cribriform-predominant adenocarcinomas for assessment, when the percentage of all cribriform was combined with other architectures, it was associated with a worse prognosis. The majority of the parameters assessed demonstrated significance with univariate analysis but only mitotic index, as assessed by the highest count/10 high-power fields remained significant with multivariate analysis., Conclusion: In this study of resected stage 1 primary lung adenocarcinoma, we found mitotic index to be the only independent prognostic marker. It was more closely associated with outcome than either pathologic T stage or IASLC/ATS/ERS architecture-based classification. Further validation of concordance and reproducibility in reporting mitotic index, as well as validation of prognostic significance, needs to be undertaken in independent data sets.

DNA methylation is part of the epigenetic gene regulation complex, which is relevant for the pathogenesis of cancer. We performed a genome-wide search for methylated CpG islands in tumors and corresponding non-malignant lung tissue samples of 101 stages I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients by combining methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis. Overall, we identified 2414 genomic positions differentially methylated between tumor and non-malignant lung tissue samples. Ninety-seven percent of them were found to be tumor-specifically methylated. Annotation of these genomic positions resulted in the identification of 477 tumor-specifically methylated genes of which many are involved in regulation of gene transcription and cell adhesion. Tumor-specific methylation was confirmed by a gene-specific approach. In the majority of tumors, methylation of certain genes was associated with loss of their protein expression determined by immunohistochemistry. Treatment of NSCLC cells with epigenetically active drugs resulted in upregulated expression of many tumor-specifically methylated genes analyzed by gene expression microarrays suggesting that about one-third of these genes are transcriptionally regulated by methylation. Moreover, comparison of methylation results with certain clinicopathological characteristics of the patients suggests that methylation of HOXA2 and HOXA10 may be of prognostic relevance in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. In conclusion, we identified a large number of tumor-specifically methylated genes in NSCLC patients. Expression of many of them is regulated by methylation. Moreover, HOXA2 and HOXA10 methylation may serve as prognostic parameters in SCC patients. Overall, our findings emphasize the impact of methylation on the pathogenesis of NSCLCs.

Introduction: Lung cancer and COPD commonly coexist in smokers, and the presence of COPD increases the risk of developing lung cancer. In addition to smoking cessation and preventing smoking initiation, understanding the shared mechanisms of these smoking-related lung diseases is critical, in order to develop new methods of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer and COPD., Areas Covered: This review discusses the common mechanisms for susceptibility to lung cancer and COPD, which in addition to cigarette smoke, may involve inflammation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, abnormal repair, oxidative stress, and cell proliferation. Furthermore, we discuss the underlying genomic and epigenomic changes (single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), copy number variation, promoter hypermethylation and microRNAs) that are likely to alter biological pathways, leading to susceptibility to lung cancer and COPD (e.g., altered nicotine receptor biology)., Expert Opinion: Strategies to study genomics, epigenomics and gene-environment interaction will yield greater insight into the shared pathogenesis of lung cancer and COPD, leading to new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Asbestos-related lung cancer accounts for 4-12% of all lung cancers worldwide. Since putative mechanisms of carcinogenesis differ between asbestos and tobacco induced lung cancers, tumors induced by the two agents may be genetically distinct. To identify gene expression biomarkers associated with asbestos-related lung tumorigenicity we performed gene expression array analysis on tumors of 36 patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma, comparing 12 patients with lung asbestos body counts above levels associated with urban dwelling (ARLC-AC: asbestos-related lung cancer-adenocarcinoma) with 24 patients with no asbestos bodies (NARLC-AC: non-asbestos related lung cancer-adenocarcinoma). Genes differentially expressed between ARLC-AC and NARLC-AC were identified on fold change and P value, and then prioritized using gene ontology. Candidates included ZNRF3, ADAM28, PPP1CA, IRF6, RAB3D, and PRDX1. Expression of these six genes was technically and biologically replicated by qRT-PCR in the training set and biologically validated in three independent test sets. ADAM28, encoding a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain protein that interacts with integrins, was consistently upregulated in ARLC across all four datasets. Further studies are being designed to investigate the possible role of this gene in asbestos lung tumorigenicity, its potential utility as a marker of asbestos related lung cancer for purposes of causal attribution, and its potential as a treatment target for lung cancers arising in asbestos exposed persons.

Purpose: Improving outcomes for early-stage lung cancer is a major research focus at present because a significant proportion of stage I patients develop recurrent disease within 5 years of curative-intent lung resection. Within tumor stage groups, conventional prognostic indicators currently fail to predict relapse accurately., Experimental Design: To identify a gene signature predictive of recurrence in primary lung adenocarcinoma, we analyzed gene expression profiles in a training set of 48 node-negative tumors (stage I-II), comparing tumors from cases who remained disease-free for a minimum of 36 months with those from cases whose disease recurred within 18 months of complete resection., Results: Cox proportional hazards modeling with leave-one-out cross-validation identified a 54-gene signature capable of predicting risk of recurrence in two independent validation cohorts of 55 adenocarcinomas [log-rank P=0.039; hazard ratio (HR), 2.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1-4.7] and 40 adenocarcinomas (log-rank P=0.044; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9). Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis found that predicted poor-outcome groups had significantly shorter survival, and furthermore, the signature predicted outcome independently of conventional indicators of tumor stage and node stage. In a subset of earliest stage adenocarcinomas, generally expected to have good outcome, the signature predicted samples with significantly poorer survival., Conclusions: We describe a 54-gene signature that predicts the risk of recurrent disease independently of tumor stage and which therefore has potential to refine clinical prognosis for patients undergoing resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Common polymorphisms in genes encoding phase I and phase II enzymes are considered to modify lung cancer risk due to changes in enzyme activity. Candidates include genetic variants of glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). We performed a large case-control study of these candidate genes in 1103 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 627 controls without NSCLC. Associations between deletion genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of GSTP1 Ile105Val and MPO G-463A were first tested by adjusted logistic regression. Then we analysed gene-gene interactions, also incorporating our published data on the Ile462Val SNP in the phase I enzyme, cytochrome P450 CYP1A1. The homozygous GSTP1 105Val genotype was significantly under-represented in NSCLC compared with controls (OR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.53-1.00; P = 0.050), especially in females (OR = 0.57; 95%CI 0.34-0.98; P = 0.04). The GSTT1-null genotype was significantly over-represented in adenocarcinomas (OR = 1.41; 95%CI 1.06-1.90; P = 0.02) but not in squamous cell carcinomas (OR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.76-1.41; P = 0.84). There was weak risk reduction associated with GSTM1 null in heavy smokers (OR = 0.71; 95%CI 0.54-0.94; P = 0.02), but neither GSTM1 nor MPO genotypes affected the overall risk of NSCLC. The MPO and CYP1A1 risk genotypes interacted to increase the overall risk of NSCLC (OR = 2.88; 95%CI 1.70-5.00; P < 0.001). The data are consistent with the concept that multiple genes of modest effect interact to confer genomic-based susceptibility to lung cancer.

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) in lung cancers predict for sensitivity to EGFR kinase inhibitors. HER2 (also known as NEU, EGFR2, or ERBB2) is a member of the EGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases and plays important roles in the pathogenesis of certain human cancers, and mutations have recently been reported in lung cancers. We sequenced the tyrosine kinase domain of HER2 in 671 primary non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), 80 NSCLC cell lines, and 55 SCLCs and other neuroendocrine lung tumors as well as 85 other epithelial cancers (breast, bladder, prostate, and colorectal cancers) and compared the mutational status with clinicopathologic features and the presence of EGFR or KRAS mutations. HER2 mutations were present in 1.6% (11 of 671) of NSCLC and were absent in other types of cancers. Only one adenocarcinoma cell line (NCI-H1781) had a mutation. All HER2 mutations were in-frame insertions in exon 20 and target the identical corresponding region as did EGFR insertions. HER2 mutations were significantly more frequent in never smokers (3.2%, 8 of 248; P=0.02) and adenocarcinoma histology (2.8%, 11 of 394; P=0.003). In 394 adenocarcinoma cases, HER2 mutations preferentially targeted Oriental ethnicity (3.9%) compared with other ethnicities (0.7%), female gender (3.6%) compared with male gender (1.9%) and never smokers (4.1%) compared with smokers (1.4%). Mutations in EGFR, HER2, and KRAS genes were never present together in individual tumors and cell lines. The remarkable similarities of mutations in EGFR and HER2 genes involving tumor type and subtype, mutation type, gene location, and specific patient subpopulations targeted are unprecedented and suggest similar etiologic factors. EGFR, HER2, and KRAS mutations are mutually exclusive, suggesting different pathways to lung cancer in smokers and never smokers.