Search

Background: Surgery remains the standard of care in rectal cancer. Select patients will not undergo surgery for reasons such as medical inoperability or a watch-and-wait approach and instead are managed with definitive chemoradiation., Objective: We used the National Cancer Database to identify overall survival and predictors thereof in the nonoperative management of patients with rectal cancer., Design: This was a retrospective review., Settings: This study used deidentified data from the National Cancer Database., Patients: We queried the national cancer database from 2004 to 2014 for stage 1 to 3 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with only chemotherapy and radiation to definitive doses. Dose escalated therapy was defined as >54 Gy., Main Outcome Measures: Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify sociodemographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics predictive of dose escalation and overall survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias., Results: Among the 6311 patients eligible for the study, 11% were treated with doses >54 Gy. Earlier stage and increased age/comorbidity patients were more likely to receive dose escalation, and patients with more recent treatment and treatment at an academic facility were less likely. The median follow-up time was 31 months (range, 2-154 mo). Three- and 5-year overall survival rates for all patients were 60% and 46%. Patients treated with dose escalation had a median survival of 33 months compared with 56 months for those treated with ≤54 Gy (p < 0.0001)., Limitations: The main limitation is the inherent selection bias present in National Cancer Database studies. Important treatment details and outcomes as they relate to a definitive chemoradiation approach in rectal cancer are lacking. Salvage therapy was also not recorded, which in this population could be surgery., Conclusions: In this analysis, dose escalation in the nonoperative management of rectal cancer was associated with a lower overall survival compared with more conventional doses. Careful patient selection and enrollment on appropriate clinical trials may be warranted in the nonoperative setting. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B15. LA QUIMIORRADIACIÓN DEFINITIVA PARA EL CÁNCER RECTAL: ¿HAY LUGAR PARA EL AUMENTO DE LA DOSIS? UN ESTUDIO DE BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL DEL CÁNCER:: La cirugía sigue siendo el estándar en el tratamiento del cáncer rectal. Algunos pacientes no son quirúrgicos por razones como, no ser operables o con el enfoque de ver y esperar, y en su lugar son tratados con la quimiorradiación definitiva.Utilizamos la base de datos nacional del cáncer para identificar la supervivencia general y los factores predictivos de la misma, en el tratamiento no quirúrgico de pacientes con cáncer rectal.Esta fue una revisión retrospectiva.Utilizamos los datos identificados en la base de datos nacional del cáncer.Se consultó la base de datos nacional del cáncer del 2004-2014, para adenocarcinoma rectal en estadio 1-3, tratada únicamente con quimioterapia y radiación hasta la dosis definitiva. La terapia de aumento de la dosis se definió como >54 Gy.Se realizaron análisis univariables y multivariables para identificar características sociodemográficas, de tratamiento y predictivas del aumento de la dosis y supervivencia en general. Los índices de riesgo proporcionales de Cox ajustados a la propensión para la supervivencia, se utilizaron para tener en cuenta el sesgo de indicación.Entre los 6311 pacientes elegibles para el estudio, el 11% fue tratado con dosis >54 Gy. Los pacientes en estadios tempranos y con mayor edad/comorbilidad, tenían más probabilidades de recibir aumento de la dosis, y menos propensos los pacientes con tratamientos recientes y de centros académicos. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 31 meses (2-154 meses). Las tasas de supervivencia global de tres y cinco años para todos los pacientes, fueron respectivamente del 60% y 46%. Los pacientes tratados con aumento de la dosis, tuvieron una supervivencia media de 33 meses, en comparación con los 56 meses para los pacientes tratados con ≤54 Gy (p < 0,0001).La principal limitación es el inherente sesgo en la selección, presente en los estudios de la base de datos nacional del cáncer. Faltan los detalles importantes del tratamiento y los resultados en relación con el enfoque definitivo de quimiorradiación en cáncer rectal. Tampoco se registró la terapia de rescate, que en esta población podría ser la cirugía.En este análisis, el aumento de la dosis en el manejo no quirúrgico del cáncer rectal, se asoció con una menor supervivencia global, en comparación con la dosis más convencional. La cuidadosa selección del paciente y la inscripción en los apropiados ensayos clínicos, pueden estar justificados en el entorno no quirúrgico. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B15.

Objective: The purpose of the current study is to determine the efficacy of a PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor, LY3023414, on established EAC in an in vivo model., Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a highly lethal cancer with limited treatment options. The PI3K/mTOR pathway is upregulated in EAC and may be a target for novel therapies., Methods: Esophagojejunostomy was performed on Sprague-Dawley rats to induce carcinogenesis, and LY3023414 was cyclically administered intraperitoneally between 32 and 40 weeks postsurgery to treatment animals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology were used to determine clinical response. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and Western blot were used to validate apoptosis by cleaved caspase-3, proliferation by Ki67, and pathway inhibition, respectively., Results: Mean MRI tumor volume increased by 109.2% in controls (n = 32) and decreased by 56.8% in treatment animals (n=17) (P < 0.01). Treatment with LY3023414 demonstrated tumor volume increase in 0% (control = 46.4%) (P < 0.01), decrease in 58.8% (control = 7.1%) (P < 0.01), and stable volume in 41.2% (control = 46.4%) (P = 0.77). EAC prevalence in controls increased by 25%; whereas, prevalence in treatment animals decreased by 29.4% (P < 0.01). Approximately, 75% of treatment animals presenting with residual masses on MRI had a histological response >50%. Increased apoptosis by cleaved caspase-3 (P = 0.03) and decreased proliferation by Ki67 (P < 0.01) were demonstrated in the treatment arm, when compared with the control arm. On Western blot analysis of pathway checkpoints, p-mTOR (p=0.03) and PI3K-α (P = 0.04) were downregulated in treatment responsive residual tumors, when compared with controls., Conclusions: LY3023414 demonstrates efficacy against EAC in a preclinical model, establishing the rationale for clinical testing.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive cancer necessitating the development of improved risk stratification tools for personalized care. Previously, microRNAs have been shown to correlate with the progression and prognosis of various cancer types; however, the value in EAC remains largely unexplored. We performed global microRNA profiling on 32 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded EAC specimens to identify microRNAs associated with progression. Literature search and pathway analysis further refined output to five significantly deregulated candidate biomarkers. Four of the five microRNAs (miR-652-5p, miR-7-2-3p, miR-3925-3p, and miR-219-3p) were validated by qRT-PCR. Survival outcomes were evaluated in testing set of 26 stage II/III EAC patients to determine the prognostic relevance of the selected microRNAs. In the testing set, miR-652-5p and miR-7-2-3p expressions were significantly associated with progression-free survival (p-value = .00771 and p-value = .00293). The highest area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.8212 for the combination of miR-652-5p and miR-7-2-3p. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that the miR-652-5p/miR-7-2-3p signature may serve as a promising prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced EAC.

The myc gene family encodes nuclear phosphoproteins that are thought to play a role in the control of cellular proliferation and differentiation. We have undertaken an immunohistochemical study assessing the expression of myc gene family proteins in individual cells of normal colonic mucosa, colorectal polyps, and colorectal adenocarcinomas. We screened a panel of mouse monoclonal antibodies that we raised against recombinant human c-myc and N-myc proteins for recognition of myc proteins in paraffin tissue sections. Two of these antibodies, H120C69 and H8C150, were selected for indirect immunoperoxidase staining of tissue sections from 16 normal mucosas, 24 polyps, and 30 adenocarcinomas. In normal colon, about 25% of the cells in the lower one-third of the crypts of Lieberkühn stain for myc-related protein. This distribution resembles that of proliferating cells in the crypt. Benign hyperplastic polyps resemble normal mucosa in their myc staining pattern, with about 25% of the cells positive. In adenomatous polyps, the putative precursors of adenocarcinomas, from 50 to 100% of the cells stain positively for myc protein. In these cases, stained cells extend to the luminal surface, consistent with the previously reported expansion of the proliferation zone in these lesions. All adenocarcinomas examined had increased levels of myc protein relative to normal mucosa. The tumor cells exhibited markedly heterogeneous myc staining patterns, both among different tumors and, in some cases, within a single tumor. Comparison with Ki-67 monoclonal antibody staining indicates that myc protein expression in many tumors is uncoupled from cellular proliferation. Surprisingly, we observed increased numbers of myc-expressing cells and increased levels of myc protein in histologically normal colon directly adjacent to tumor, suggesting that many colorectal carcinomas secrete growth factors that activate gene expression in neighboring normal mucosa.

Colorectal carcinoma serves as a model system for the study of changes in gene expression and structure relating to tumorigenesis. In this study, the levels of c-myc, N-myc and L-myc mRNAs were assessed in normal human colonic mucosa in 33 cases representing different stages of adenocarcinoma and in 36 adenomatous polyps, the presumed premalignant stage. Consistent with the findings of Erisman et al. (1985), we found that the c-myc gene was overexpressed (3-24-fold) in approximately two-thirds of the tumors examined. Amplification of the gene (3-4-fold) was observed in 2 of 12 tumors examined and did not correlate with the level of expression. Greater amounts of c-myc-specific mRNA than occur in normal tissue was also found in about two-thirds of the polyps examined demonstrating that premalignant lesions also overexpress the gene. N-myc and L-myc specific transcripts can be detected at low abundance in normal colonic mucosa. These genes were found to be frequently overexpressed in tumors and polyps, but in most cases the level of overexpression was modest. A single case of adenocarcinoma showed an approximately 30-fold increase in the level of N-myc mRNA without gene amplification. Adenomatous polyps more frequently overexpressed the L-myc gene than tumors.