Search

Purpose: To report on the planning procedure, quality control, and clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) delivering a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with primary irresectable cervix carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Six patients underwent PET-CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) before treatment planning. Prescription (25 fractions) was (1) a median dose (D(50)) of 62, 58 and 56 Gy to the primary tumor (GTV_cervix), primary clinical target volume (CTV_cervix) and its planning target volume (PTV_cervix), respectively; (2) a D(50) of 60 Gy to the PET-positive lymph nodes (GTV_nodes); (3) a minimal dose (D(98)) of 45 Gy to the planning target volume of the elective lymph nodes (PTV_nodes). IMAT plans were generated using an anatomy-based exclusion tool with the aid of weight and leaf position optimization. The dosimetric delivery of IMAT was validated preclinically using radiochromic film dosimetry., Results: Five to nine arcs were needed to create valid IMAT plans. Dose constraints on D(50) were not met in two patients (both GTV_cervix: 1 Gy and 3 Gy less). D(98) for PTV_nodes was not met in three patients (1 Gy each). Film dosimetry showed excellent gamma evaluation. There were no treatment interruptions., Conclusion: IMAT allows delivering an SIB to the macroscopic tumor without compromising the dose to the elective lymph nodes or the organs at risk. The clinical implementation is feasible.

Background and Purpose: Local relapse after radiotherapy for prostate cancer mostly originates at the original tumor location. Dose escalation reduces local relapse rates. It may be of benefit to focus the highest dose to the intraprostatic lesion (GTVMRI) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Therefore, the visualization of the GTVMRI and its inclusion into computer optimization is mandatory., Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma were referred for IMRT. All these patients had a palpable lesion on digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or a PSA >10.0 ng/ml. A T2-weighted MR examination of the prostate was performed in order to detect a GTV(MRI) and correlate the location of the GTV(MRI) with the site of the tumour-containing cylinder (biopsy). Two IMRT plans were compared: a plan without the inclusion of the GTV(MRI) (IMRT-CONV) versus a plan including the GTV(MRI) into the plan optimization (IMRT-GTV(MRI)). For comparison, both physical and biological endpoints of the GTV(MRI), CTV, PTV and rectum were taken into account. After the finalization of the planning study, the IMRT-GTV(MRI) plans were clinically delivered using step-and-shoot IMRT. Acute gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were recorded., Results: In all cases, the location of the GTV(MRI) corresponded with the site of the tumor containing biopsy cylinder. The mean and median distance of the GTV(MRI) to the anterior rectal wall was 3 and 2mm, respectively (range: 0-12 mm). For the GTV(MRI), its inclusion in the optimization led to a significant increase of all physical endpoints (P<0.01), without compromising the dose to the CTV, PTV and rectum. Mean GTV(MRI) dose was 78.3 Gy (IMRT-GTV(MRI)) versus 76.9 Gy (IMRT-CONV) (P<0.00001). All IMRT treatments were successfully delivered within 6 min. We did not observe grade 3 acute GI toxicity. One patient developed grade 3 GU toxicity (nocturia), that disappeared after administration of medication. Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity was observed in, respectively, four and six patients., Conclusion: Using T2-weighted MR, the visualization of an intraprostatic lesion is feasible. The inclusion of the GTV(MRI) into planning optimization leads to a modest increase in dose, without compromising the dose to the CTV, PTV and organs at risk. The clinical delivery of these plans runs without problems. Acute toxicity is mild.

Purpose: In rectal cancer, combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either pre- or postoperatively, is an accepted treatment. Late small bowel (SB) toxicity is a feared side effect and limits radiation-dose escalation in a volume-dependent way. A planning strategy for intensity- modulated arc therapy (IMAT) was developed, and IMAT was clinically implemented with the aim to reduce the volume of SB irradiated at high doses and thus reduce SB toxicity. We report on the treatment plans of the first 7 patients, on the comparison of IMAT with conventional 3D planning (3D), and on the feasibility of IMAT delivery., Methods and Materials: Seven patients, who were referred to our department for preoperative (n = 4) or postoperative (n = 3) radiotherapy for rectal cancer, gave written consent for IMAT treatment. All patients had a planning CT in prone position. The delineation of the clinical target volume was done after fusion of CT and MRI, with the help of a radiologist. For the IMAT plan, arcs were generated using an anatomy-based segmentation tool. The optimization of the arcs was done by weight optimization (WO) and leaf position optimization (LPO), both of which were adapted for IMAT purposes. The 3D plans used one posterior and two lateral wedged beams, of which the outlines were shaped to the beam's-eye view projection of the planning target volume (PTV). Beam WO was done by constrained matrix inversion. For dose-volume histogram analysis, all plans were normalized to 45 Gy as median PTV dose. Polymer gel dosimetry (PGD) on a humanoid phantom was used for the validation of the total chain (planning to delivery). IMAT treatments were delivered by an Elekta SliPlus linear accelerator using prototype software with the same interlock class as in clinical mode., Results: The IMAT plan resulted in 3 to 6 arcs, with a mean delivery time of 6.3 min and a mean of 456 monitor units (MU) for a 180 cGy fraction. The minimal dose in the PTV was not significantly different between 3D and IMAT plans. Inhomogeneity was highest for the IMAT plans (14.1%) and lowest for the 3D plans (9.9%). Mean dose to the SB was significantly lower for the IMAT plans (12.4 Gy) than for the 3D plans (17.0 Gy). The volume of SB receiving less than any dose level was lower for the IMAT plans than for 3D plans. Integral dose was lower in the IMAT plans than for the 3D plans (respectively 244 J and 262 J to deliver 45 Gy). Differences between the PGD measured dose and the calculated dose were as small for IMAT as for 3D treatments., Conclusion: IMAT plans are deliverable within a 5-10-minute time slot, and result in a lower dose to the SB than 3D plans, without creating significant underdosages in the PTV. PGD showed that IMAT delivery is as accurate as 3D delivery.

Purpose: Whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy (WAPRT) is a treatment option in the palliation of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. With conventional techniques, kidneys and liver are the dose- and homogeneity-limiting organs. We developed a planning strategy for intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and report on the treatment plans of the first 5 treated patients., Methods and Materials: Five consecutive patients with histologically proven relapsed ovarian cancer were sent to our department for WAPRT. The target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated on 0.5-cm-thick CT slices. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the total peritoneal cavity. CTV and kidneys were expanded with 0.5 cm. In a preset range of 8 degrees interspaced gantry angles, machine states were generated with an anatomy-based segmentation tool. Machine states of the same class were stratified in arcs. The optimization of IMAT was done in several steps, using a biophysical objective function. These steps included weight optimization of machine states, leaf position optimization adapted to meet the maximal leaf speed constraint, and planner-interactive optimization of the start and stop angles. The final control points (machine states plus associated cumulative monitor unit counts) were calculated using a collapsed cone convolution/superposition algorithm. For comparison, two conventional plans (CONV) were made, one with two fields (CONV2), and one with four fields (CONV4). In these CONV plans, dose to the kidneys was limited by cerrobend blocks. The IMAT and the CONV plans were normalized to a median dose of 33 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV). Monomer/polymer gel dosimetry was used to assess the dosimetric accuracy of the IMAT planning and delivery method., Results: The median volume of the PTV was 8306 cc. The mean treatment delivery time over 4 patients was 13.8 min. A mean of 444 monitor units was needed for a fraction dose of 150 cGy. The fraction of the PTV volume receiving more than 90% of the prescribed dose (V(90)) was 9% higher for the IMAT plan than for the CONV4 plan (89.9% vs. 82.5%). Outside a build-up region of 0.8 cm and 1 cm away from both kidneys, the inhomogeneity in the PTV was 15.1% for the IMAT plans and 24.9% for the CONV4 plans (for CONV2 plans, this was 34.9%). The median dose to the kidneys in the IMAT plans was lower for all patients. The 95th percentile dose for the kidneys was significantly higher for the IMAT plans than for the CONV4 and CONV2 plans (28.2 Gy vs. 22.2 Gy and 22.6 Gy for left kidney, respectively). No relevant differences were found for liver. The gel-measured dose was within clinical planning constraints., Conclusion: IMAT was shown to be deliverable in an acceptable time slot and to produce dose distributions that are more homogeneous than those obtained with a CONV plan, with at least equal sparing of the OARs.

Aim: This communication reviews the planning strategies and dose statistics of nine IMRT plans generated for a complex head and neck case., Patient and Method: An ethmoid sinus cancer case was sent as an IMRT planning task to all participants of the ESTRO course on "IMRT and Other Conformal Techniques in Practice", held in Amsterdam in June 2001., Results: Nine IMRT plans were generated for the case, the majority of the plans generated with commercial planning systems. The number of beam incidences ranged between four and eleven, while five of the nine beam setups were coplanar. The planning target volume dose homogeneity was inversely correlated with the degree of sparing of the surrounding organs at risk., Conclusion: IMRT strategies for complex head and neck cases, such as ethmoid sinus cancer, can be strikingly different in various aspects, such as beam setup, total number of segments, PTV dose coverage and dose statistics for organs at risks.

Purpose: To develop a protocol for the irradiation of ethmoid sinus cancer, with the aim of sparing binocular vision; of developing a strategy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning that produces dose distributions that (1) are consistent with the protocol prescriptions and (2) are deliverable by static segmental IMRT techniques within a 15-minute time slot; of fine tuning the implementation strategy to a class solution approach that is sufficiently automated and efficient, allowing routine clinical application; of reporting on the early clinical implementation involving 11 patients between February 1999 and July 2000. patients and methods: Eleven consecutive T1-4N0M0 ethmoid sinus cancer patients were enrolled in the study. For Patients 1-8, a first protocol was implemented, defining a planning target volume prescription dose of 60 to 66 Gy in 30-33 fractions and a maximum dose (Dmax) of 50 Gy to optic pathway structures and spinal cord and limit of 60 Gy to brainstem. For Patients 9-11, an adapted (now considered mature) protocol was implemented, defining a (planning target volume) prescription dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions and a Dmax to optic pathway structures and brainstem of 60 Gy and to spinal cord of 50 Gy., Results: The class solution-directed strategy developed during this study reduced the protocol translation process from a few days to about 2 hours of planner time. The mature class solution involved the use of 7 beam incidences (20-37 segments), which could be delivered within a 15-minute time slot. Acute side effects were limited and mild. None of the patients developed dry eye syndrome or other visual disturbances. The follow-up period is too short for detection of retinopathy or optic nerve and chiasm toxicity., Conclusion: Conventional radiotherapy of ethmoid sinus tumors is associated with serious morbidity, including blindness. We hypothesize that IMRT has the potential to save binocular vision. The dose to the optic pathway structures can be reduced selectively by IMRT. Further enrollment of patients and longer follow-up will show whether the level of reduction tested by the clinical protocol is sufficient to save binocular vision. An adaptive strategy of IMRT planning was too inefficient for routine clinical practice. A class solution-directed strategy improved efficiency by eliminating human trial and error during the IMRT planning process.

Purpose: To evaluate whether intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by static segmented beams allows the dose to the main portion of the prostate target to escalate while keeping the maximal dose at the anterior rectal wall at 72 Gy. The value of such IMRT plans was analyzed by comparison with non-IMRT plans using the same beam incidences., Methods and Materials: We performed a planning study on the CT data of 32 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Three fields in the transverse plane with gantry angles of 0 degrees, 116 degrees, and 244 degrees were isocentered at the center of gravity of the target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles). The geometry of the beams was determined by beam's eye view autocontouring of the target volume with a margin of 1.5 cm. In study 1, the beam weights were determined by a human planner (3D-man) or by computer optimization using a biological objective function with (3D-optim-lim) or without (3D-optim-unlim) a physical term to limit target dose inhomogeneity. In study 2, the 3 beam incidences mentioned above were used and in-field uniform segments were added to allow IMRT. Plans with (IMRT-lim) or without (IMRT-unlim) constraints on target dose inhomogeneity were compared. In the IMRT-lim plan, target dose inhomogeneity was constrained between 15% and 20%. After optimization, plans in both studies were normalized to a maximal rectal dose of 72 Gy. Biological (tumor control probability [TCP], normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]) and physical indices for tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities were computed, as well as the probability of the uncomplicated local control (P+)., Results: The IMRT-lim plan was superior to all other plans concerning TCP (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan had the worst TCP. Within the 3D plans, the 3D-optim-unlim had the best TCP, which was significantly different from the 3D-optim-lim plan (p = 0.0003). For rectal NTCP, both IMRT plans were superior to all other plans (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan was significantly better than the IMRT-lim plan (p < 0.0001). Again, 3D-optim-unlim was superior to the other 3D plans (p < 0. 0007). Physical endpoints for target showed the mean minimal target dose to be the lowest in the IMRT-unlim plan, caused by a large target dose inhomogeneity (TDI). Medial target dose, 90th percentile, and maximal target dose were significantly higher in both IMRT plans. Physical endpoints for the rectum showed the IMRT-unlim plan to be superior compared to all other plans. There was a strong correlation between the 65th percentile (Rp65) and rectal NTCP (correlation coefficient > or =89%). For bladder, maximal bladder dose was significantly higher in the IMRT-unlim plan compared to all other plans (p < or = 0.0001).P+ was significantly higher in both IMRT-plans than in all other plans. The 3D-optim-unlim plan was significantly better than the two other 3D plans (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: IMRT significantly increases the ratio of TCP over NTCP of the rectum in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, constraints for TDI are needed, because a high degree of TDI reduced minimal target dose. IMRT improved uncomplicated local control probability. In our department, IMRT by static segmented beams is planned and delivered in a cost-effective way. IMRT-lim has replaced non-modulated conformal radiotherapy as the standard treatment for prostate cancer.

Background and Purpose: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is used in our department for treatment of paranasal sinuses. We describe the methodology that was developed together with the clinical implementation, illustrated by a case report., Material and Methods: Patient history, treatment and short follow-up are described. An IMRT, obtained by superposition of static beam segments was implemented. Electronic portal images, compared to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) were used to evaluate and adjust patient positioning., Results, Discussion and Conclusion: IMRT is an appropriate and feasible treatment technique for head and neck cancer in anatomical regions that are difficult to treat. A high tumour dose can be combined with a good sparing of the surrounding organs at risk (OAR's).