Search

Objective: To assess the bioequivalence of vildagliptin/metformin fixeddose combination (FDC) tablets (50/250 mg and 50/500 mg) to free combinations of vildagliptin and metformin and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vildagliptin and metformin following administration of 50/500 mg FDC tablets., Methods: Two openlabel, randomized, single-center, singledose, 2-period crossover studies were conducted in Japanese healthy male volunteers. Participants were administered vildagliptin/ metformin FDC tablets (study I: 50/250 mg, study II: 50/500 mg) or their free combinations under fasted condition. Food effect (standard Japanese breakfast: fat, 20 - 30% with ~ 600 kcal in total) was assessed during an additional period in study II (50/500 mg). PK parameters (AUC, C(max), t(max), t(1/2)) were calculated for vildagliptin and metformin., Results: In both studies, vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their respective free combinations. Administration of FDC tablets after meals had no effect on vildagliptin PK parameters. The rate of absorption of metformin decreased when administered under fed condition, as reflected by a prolonged t(max) (3 hours in fasted state vs. 4 hours in fed state) and decrease in C(max) by 26%, however, the extent of absorption (AUC(last)) was similar to that in the fasted state., Conclusions: Vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their free combinations. Food decreased the C(max) of metformin by 26%, while AUC(last) was unchanged, consistent with previous reports. No food effect was observed on the C(max) or AUC(last) of vildagliptin. Thus, food had no clinically relevant effects on the PK of metformin or vildagliptin.

Aim: To assess whether there is a difference in the effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)., Methods: This was an open-label, randomized cross-over study conducted in T2DM patients. A total of 24 patients (age: 58.3 ± 5.56 years, baseline HbA1c: 7.6 ± 0.50%) who were on stable metformin monotherapy (500-3000 mg) were enrolled, and all completed the study. Each patient received two 5-day treatments (vildagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. or glimepiride 2 mg q.d.) in a cross-over manner. Various biomarkers and blood glucose concentrations were measured following breakfast. The 24-h glucose profiles were also measured using the CGM device at baseline and after 5 days of treatment, and fluctuations in glucose levels were estimated from CGM data., Results: Both vildagliptin and glimepiride reduced postprandial glucose levels, based on both CGM data (15% vs. 16%) and measured plasma glucose (13% vs.17%). Vildagliptin showed lower glucose fluctuations than glimepiride as measured by mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE, p = 0.1076), standard deviation (s.d., p = 0.1346) of blood glucose rate of change, but did not reach statistical significance attributed to the small sample size. MAGE was reduced by ∼20% with vildagliptin versus glimepiride. Vildagliptin led to statistically significant lowering of the rate of change in the median curve (RCMC) and interquartile range (IQR) of glucose. Treatment with vildagliptin significantly increased the levels of active glucagon-like peptide-1 by 2.36-fold (p ≤ 0.0001) and suppressed glucagon by 8% (p = 0.01), whereas glimepiride significantly increased the levels of insulin and C-peptide by 21% (p = 0.012) and 12% (p = 0.003), respectively., Conclusions: Vildagliptin treatment was associated with less fluctuation of glucose levels than glimepiride treatment as assessed by 24-h CGM device, suggesting vildagliptin may have the potential to offer long-term beneficial effects for patients with T2DM in preventing the development of complications of diabetes., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The kidney plays a key role in both the metabolism and excretion of vildagliptin. This study was designed to investigate the effects of varying degrees of renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin., Methods: A total of 96 subjects were enrolled, and each subject received vildagliptin 50 mg dosed orally once daily for 14 days. Vildagliptin and metabolite concentrations in plasma and urine were measured on Days 1 and 14., Results: Compared to age-, gender-, BMI-matched subjects with normal renal function, the mean AUC of vildagliptin after 14 days in patients with mild, moderate, and severe RI increased by 40%, 71%, and 100%, respectively, and the Cmax of vildagliptin showed similar and minimal increases of 37%, 32% and 36%, respectively., Conclusions: These pharmacokinetics results suggest that 50 mg once daily is an appropriate dose and recommended for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment.

Objective: To assess the extent of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between vildagliptin, a potent and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) enzyme, and voglibose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor widely prescribed in Japan, when coadministered in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes., Methods: In this open-label, randomized, 3-treatment, 3-period and 6-way crossover study, 24 Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes received 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily; 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily co-administered with 0.2 mg voglibose three times daily; or 0.2 mg voglibose three times daily for 3 days in each period. Plasma concentrations of vildagliptin, DPP-4, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose, insulin, and glucagon were determined from blood samples collected at steady state., Results: Exposure to vildagliptin 50 mg (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUCτ,ss)) and maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) was reduced by 23% and 34% respectively with co-administration of voglibose. The percentage of DPP-4 inhibition by vildagliptin remained unchanged when vildagliptin was given alone or co-administered with voglibose; maximum inhibition was 98.3 ± 1.4% (mean ± SD) for vildagliptin alone and 97.4 ± 1.1% with co-administration. Coadministration of vildagliptin and voglibose led to a greater increase in the active GLP-1 plasma concentration than did vildagliptin alone (geometric mean ratio 1.63 (90% CI, 1.30, 2.03), p = 0.0007). The combination of vildagliptin and voglibose also led to a significantly lower plasma glucose levels (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Plasma vildagliptin levels were decreased when voglibose was co-administered, although DPP- 4 inhibition remained unchanged. Co-administration led to significantly better pharmacodynamic response compared with each treatment alone, including higher active GLP-1 and lower glucose levels. The results indicate that this coadministration may be beneficial in the clinical situation. Vildagliptin and voglibose treatments, alone or when co-administered, were well tolerated in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes.