Search

Over the last 20 years the epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has significantly changed, affecting both the acute and post-acute phases. In particular, although the progressive reduction in in-hospital mortality, the trend in post-hospital mortality was found to be stable or increasing. This trend was at least in part attributed to the improved short-term prognosis due to coronary interventions in the acute phase, which ultimately have increased the population of survivors at high risk of relapse. Thus, while hospital management of ACS has shown great progress in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy, post-hospital care has not had a parallel development. This is certainly partly attributable to the inadequacy of post-discharge cardiologic facilities, so far not planned according to the level of risk of individual patients. Hence, it is crucial that patients at high risk of relapse are identified and initiated into more intensive secondary prevention strategies. On the basis of epidemiological data, the cornerstones of post-ACS prognostic stratification are represented on the one hand by the identification of heart failure (HF) at index hospitalization, on the other hand by the assessment of residual ischemic risk. In patients presenting with HF at index hospitalization, the fatal rehospitalization rate increases by 0.90% per year from 2001 to 2011, with a mortality between discharge and the first year which in 2011 was equal to 10%. The risk of fatal readmission at 1 year is therefore strongly conditioned by the presence of HF which, together with age, is the major predictor of new events. The effect of high residual ischemic risk on subsequent mortality shows increasing trend up to the second year of follow-up, moderately increasing over the years until reaching a plateau around the fifth year. These observations confirm the need for long-term secondary prevention programs and implementation of a continuous surveillance in selected patients.

LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is associated with a significant reduction in ischemic recurrences. Accordingly, international guidelines recommend a reduction of LDL-C below 70 mg/dl in ACS patients. Such a result can be accomplished by using high intensity statins, possibly associated with ezetimibe in selected cases. This document outlines the management strategies that can be consistently implemented in clinical practice in order to achieve and maintain guideline-recommended therapeutic goals.

Background: The cardioprotective role that statin and aspirin has appears to be reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This analysis aims to evaluate the impact of statin and aspirin on the outcome of patients with CKD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Methods: All patients who were enrolled in the IN-ACS Outcome registry, diagnosed with CKD, were included in our analysis. We divided patients into four groups, according to previous chronic therapy: neither aspirin nor statin therapy (Group 1), aspirin only therapy (Group 2), statin only therapy (Group 3) and aspirin plus statin therapy (Group 4)., Results: Of the 5483 patients enrolled that had data on glomerular filtration rate available, 1484 had CKD: These segregated into 589 patients in Group 1, 477 in Group 2, 89 in Group 3 and 329 in Group 4. Despite having a higher baseline risk profile, groups 3 and 4, as compared to the other two groups, exhibited a significantly lower in-hospital mortality (1% in Group 3, 2% in Group 4; but 8% in Group 1 and 7% in Group 2, p = 0.0007); while at 30 days it remained so, as it was 1% in Group 3, 4% in Group 4 (and 10% in Group 1 and 10% in Group 2 p = 0.0002); and at 1 year it was 11% in Group 3 and 13% in Group 4 (compared to 20% in Group 1 and 23% in Group 2, p = 0.0012)., Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with CKD and ACS, chronic treatment with statin or the combination of aspirin and statin is associated with short-term and long-term better outcomes for in-hospital mortality, as compared to those receiving no therapy or aspirin therapy alone.

Background: The Italian network on acute coronary syndromes outcome (IN-ACS Outcome) study is a nationwide observational, multicenter study with the aim to describe clinical epidemiology, management, 30-days and one-year outcomes of ACS in Italy., Methods: All consecutive patients admitted for ACS to 38 hospitals, between December 2005 and February 2007, were enrolled in the study. Patient in-hospital details and follow-up data at 30-days and one-year were collected using a web-based CRF and stored in a central database., Results: A total of 6045 patients (age 68 ± 13 years) were enrolled: 2313 patients (38.3%) had ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 3732 (61.7%) patients had NSTE-ACS. Primary PCI was performed in 1085 (46.9%) STEMI patients, thrombolysis in 590 (25.5%) patients, whereas 638 (27.6%) patients were not reperfused. Among patients with NSTE-ACS, coronary angiography was performed in 2797 (75%) patients, PCI in 1797 (48.2%) patients and CABG in 213 (5.7%) patients. Thirty-days and one-year mortality rates were 5.8% and 9.8%, in STEMI patients and 3.1% and 8.6%, in NSTE-ACS patients., Conclusions: The IN-ACS Outcome study showed that the management of ACS is still suboptimal. Although 30-days mortality is low, the one-year mortality is still substantial.

The utilization of cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) programmes in patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (LEPAD) is generally poor, with limited evidence of current policies for referral. The aim of the study was to evaluate, within a cohesive network of CR and vascular surgery facilities with facilitated referral process, the clinical characteristic of LEPAD patients referred to CR and related outcomes, as compared to patients not referred. The present is an observational prospective study of consecutive patients recruited at vascular surgery facilities. Out of 329 patients observed, the average referral rate to CR was 34% (28% and 39% in patients with and without recent peripheral revascularization, p<0.05). LEPAD patients entering the CR programme were similar to those who did not according to sex, age, the vascular surgery setting of evaluation, and localization of arterial lesions. Patients with moderate intermittent claudication and patients with acute limb ischemia as index event were more represented among those who attended CR (41% vs 21% and 9% vs 2% respectively, p<0.05). Patients referred to CR had five times more episodes of acute coronary syndrome and heart failure as complication of the index event. The cardiovascular risk profile (obesity 29.5% vs 11%, p<0.05; hypercholesterolemia 80% vs 61%, p<0.05) was much worse in LEPAD patients referred to CR, but conversely, they better achieved secondary prevention targets, particularly for blood pressure control (97% vs 57%, p<0.05). All-cause 2- year mortality in the whole patients' population was 6%. Patients entering the CR programme displayed less events (13.5% vs 37.7%, p<0.05), mainly death (3.1% vs 11.3%, p<0.05) and limb-related events (4.2% vs 15.2%, p<0.05). The results of our study suggest that when a cohesive network of vascular surgery and CR facilities becomes available, the referral rate to rehabilitation may increase up to one third of eligible patients. Patients with higher comorbidity and cardiovascular risk seem to have priority in the referral process, nevertheless those with peripheral revascularization are still underestimated. Entering CR may ensure better cardiovascular risk profile and cardiovascular prognosis in LEPAD patients, and consequently the systematic adoption of this care model needs to be strongly recommended and facilitated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last decades, the post-hospital mortality from coronary artery disease (CAD) has significantly increased. This new trend in the epidemiology of CAD has been largely attributed to the improvement of survival from acute coronary syndromes that generated increasing incidence of population at high risk of recurrences and rehospitalization for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF). Thus, much longer after the acute event than we had thought, we have now been facing with higher complexity of "chronic" CAD phenotypes which deserve high clinical attention and more and more intricate pharmacological management. Although the guidelines recommend implementing secondary prevention programs through cardiac rehabilitation (CR) facilities in order to achieve a better outcome, i.e. decreased morbidity, re-hospitalization and increased adherence to evidence-based interventions, the referral rate to CR is paradoxically scarce. The Italian Association of Clinical Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation (AICPR) has been launching a survey involving the Network of Italian CR centers, which will make possible to observe trends, implement guidelines recommendations and then verify the effectiveness of the interventions and outcomes in post-acute and chronic CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]