Search

Acromegaly is a chronic condition caused by the excessive production of growth hormone and is characterized by progressive morphological and systemic complications, as well as increased prevalence of psychopathologies, which markedly affect patients' quality of life. The advancing multimodal therapies, while significantly improving the morbidity and mortality, have limited impact on psychopathologies, which often persist despite disease remission. The most common psychopathologies in acromegaly include depression, anxiety and affective disorders, together with sexual dysfunction, which may be considered as either a consequence or potentially even a contributory factor to these psychopathologies. Approximately one-third of patients with acromegaly manifest depression, whereas two-thirds of patients display anxiety, with both conditions tending to be more prevalent and severe in younger patients with shorter duration of disease. Apparently, a major impact of psychological discomfort in women compared with men appears to be the fact that women tend to internalize whereas men tend to externalize their distress. Personality disorders also commonly associated with acromegaly, especially due to body image suffering, are linked to sexual dysfunction, which seems to affect women more than men. In summary, psychopathology in acromegaly is a major determinant of the quality of life and a complex array of psychological abnormalities are associated with acromegaly., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: Cabergoline (CAB) is an off-label medical therapy for acromegaly, overshadowed by first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, eg, octreotide (OCT)., Objective: This was a head-to-head comparison between OCT and CAB in inhibiting growth hormone (GH) secretion in primary cultures of GH- and GH/prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumors; we also investigated the role of somatostatin (SST) and dopamine type 2 (D2R) receptor expression., Methods: We evaluated the antisecretory effect of OCT and CAB, together with receptor mRNA expression, in 23 tumor cultures obtained from acromegaly patients referred to the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). GH concentrations in cell culture media were determined after 72-hour OCT and CAB treatment (10 nM)., Results: OCT showed a slightly higher efficacy compared with CAB (GH decrease -39.5% vs -32.5%, P = 0.079). The effect of the 2 drugs was superimposable in GH/PRL co-secreting tumors (-42.1% vs -44.8%), where SST1 and D2R had a higher expression compared with the pure GH-secreting tumors (P = 0.020 and P = 0.026). OCT was more effective than CAB in 8/23 cultures, while CAB was more effective than OCT in 3/23 (CAB+ group). In CAB+ tumors, SST1 expression was higher compared with the other groups (P = 0.034). At receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, SST1 and D2R discriminated between GH and GH/PRL co-secretion (AUC 0.856, P = 0.013; AUC 0.822, P = 0.024). SST1 was the best predictor of CAB response (≥50% GH reduction, AUC 0.913, P = 0.006; 80% sensitivity, 94% specificity)., Conclusion: OCT is 5% to 10% more effective than CAB in vitro. SST1 mRNA expression can represent a reliable marker of GH/PRL co-secreting tumors showing a preferential response to CAB treatment., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Although most tumors in patients with acromegaly are benign and are cured or controlled by surgery and/or first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands therapy, some can behave more aggressively and are resistant to these standard therapies. Acromegaly, if left untreated, is a rare and chronic disorder, commonly caused by a GH-producing pituitary adenoma and is associated with significant comorbidities and an increased mortality. Transsphenoidal surgery is considered the mainstay of acromegaly management, but medical therapy has an increasingly important role. However, disease activity is not fully controlled in a significant number of patients treated with surgery and/or high-dose first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand monotherapy. In these circumstances, therefore, repeated surgery, second-line medical therapy, and radiotherapy, alone or combined as multimodal therapeutic strategies should be considered, in a patient-centered perspective., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the primary treatment of choice in acromegaly. It is important to identify patients in whom surgical cure is not attainable at an early stage, both to inform patients on expected treatment outcome and to select those who are more likely to need additional therapy., Objective: To identify predictors for remission after TSS in acromegaly., Methods: Large multicenter study with retrospective data collection from 3 tertiary neurosurgical referral centers in The Netherlands. We analyzed clinical data since 2000 from 3 cohorts (Groningen, Nijmegen, and Rotterdam, total n = 282). Multivariate regression models were used to identify predictors of early biochemical remission (12 weeks to 1 year postoperatively) according to the 2010 consensus criteria, long-term remission (age- and sex-normalized insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] and the absence of postoperative treatment until last follow-up), and relative IGF-1 and growth hormone [GH] reduction., Results: A larger maximum tumor diameter (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.96, P ≤ .0001) was associated with a lower chance of early biochemical remission. A larger maximum tumor diameter (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97, P = .0022) and a higher random GH concentration at diagnosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, P = .0053) were associated with a lower chance of long-term remission., Conclusion: Maximum tumor diameter and random GH concentration at diagnosis are the best predictors for remission after TSS in acromegaly., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.)

Context: Hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor related to increased mortality in acromegaly. Surgical cure of acromegaly is associated with improvement in blood pressure levels, however little is known about the effect of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment in patients with hypertension. This analysis evaluates outcomes in patients with hypertension and acromegaly included in ACROSTUDY., Methods: ACROSTUDY is a global non-interventional surveillance study of long-term treatment with PEGV, monitoring its safety and efficacy. The cohort was retrospectively divided in two subgroups: patients with and without hypertension. Stepwise logistic regression and Kaplan-Meyer analyses were performed for testing predictors of mortality., Results: The total cohort included 2,090 patients with acromegaly treated with PEGV who were followed for a median of 6.8 years (range up to 12.1 years). In ACROSTUDY there were 1,344 patients with hypertension (52.3% males). This subgroup was older, had a higher BMI, and higher prevalence of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) when compared to patients without hypertension. During ACROSTUDY, 68 deaths were reported in the hypertension cohort, vs 10 in the cohort without hypertension. Both CVD (p<0.0001) and anterior pituitary deficiencies (p=0.0105) at study entry independently predicted mortality in patients with acromegaly and hypertension; Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that CVD significantly impairs survival., Conclusions: Hypertension is common in patients with acromegaly and significantly increases mortality, especially when there is concomitant CVD. These data suggest that treatment goals should extend beyond IGF-I normalization, and include optimisation of substitution of pituitary deficiencies and scrutinous screening and treatment of CVD., Competing Interests: GV has received research grants to her institution from Chiasma and Novartis, and consultancy- and/or speakers fees from Pfizer, Novartis and Ipsen. AL has received lecture and/or consulting honoraria from Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer; research grants to the Medical University of Vienna from Ipsen and Pfizer. AJL has received grants, consultancy- and speaker’s fees from Pfizer. SN has received research grants and speaker fees from Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from Ipsen. SW has received honoraria as a member of the Acrostudy Advisory Board, and lecture fees from Pfizer, Novartis and Ipsen. BB has served as PI of research grants from Novartis, Crinetics and Ionis to Massachusetts General Hospital and has received occasional consulting honoraria from Novartis, Crinetics and Pfizer. SV and JH-H are Pfizer employees., (Copyright © 2020 Vila, Luger, van der Lely, Neggers, Webb, Biller, Valluri and Hey-Hadavi.)

Context: First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) represent the mainstay of medical therapy for acromegaly, but they provide biochemical control of disease in only a subset of patients. Various pretreatment biomarkers might affect biochemical response to fg-SRLs., Objective: To identify clinical predictors of the biochemical response to fg-SRLs monotherapy defined as biochemical response (insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 ≤ 1.3 × ULN (upper limit of normal)), partial response (>20% relative IGF-1 reduction without normalization), and nonresponse (≤20% relative IGF-1 reduction), and IGF-1 reduction., Design: Retrospective multicenter study., Setting: Eight participating European centers., Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of participant data from 2 cohorts (Rotterdam and Liège acromegaly survey, 622 out of 3520 patients). Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of biochemical response to fg-SRL monotherapy., Results: Lower IGF-1 concentration at baseline (odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.95 IGF-1 ULN, P = .0073) and lower bodyweight (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99 kg, P = .038) were associated with biochemical response. Higher IGF-1 concentration at baseline (OR = 1.40, (1.19-1.65) IGF-1 ULN, P ≤ .0001), the presence of type 2 diabetes (oral medication OR = 2.48, (1.43-4.29), P = .0013; insulin therapy OR = 2.65, (1.02-6.70), P = .045), and higher bodyweight (OR = 1.02, (1.01-1.04) kg, P = .0023) were associated with achieving partial response. Younger patients at diagnosis are more likely to achieve nonresponse (OR = 0.96, (0.94-0.99) year, P = .0070). Baseline IGF-1 and growth hormone concentration at diagnosis were associated with absolute IGF-1 reduction (β = 0.90, standard error (SE) = 0.02, P ≤ .0001 and β  = 0.002, SE = 0.001, P = .014, respectively)., Conclusion: Baseline IGF-1 concentration was the best predictor of biochemical response to fg-SRL, followed by bodyweight, while younger patients were more likely to achieve nonresponse., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Although quality of life (QoL) is improved in patients with acromegaly after disease control, QoL correlates only weakly with traditional biomarkers. Our objective is to investigate a potential relation between the new serum biomarker soluble Klotho (sKlotho), GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, and QoL., Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we investigated 54 acromegaly patients biochemically well-controlled on combination treatment with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pegvisomant (PEGV) at baseline and 9 months after switching to pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR; either as monotherapy, n = 28; or in combination with PEGV, n = 26). QoL was measured by the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) questionnaire., Results: Switching to PAS-LAR treatment significantly improved QoL without altering IGF-1 levels. QoL did not correlate with GH or IGF-1 levels, but sKlotho correlated with the observed improvements in QoL by the AcroQoL global (r = -0.35, p = 0.012) and physical subdimension (r = -0.34, p = 0.017), and with PASQ headache (r = 0.28, p = 0.048), osteoarthralgia (r = 0.46, p = 0.00080) and soft tissue swelling score (r = 0.29, p = 0.041). Parallel changes in serum sKlotho and IGF-1 (r = 0.31, p = 0.023) suggest sKlotho and IGF-1 to be similarly dependent on GH. Comparing the PAS-LAR combination therapy and the monotherapy group we did not observe a significant difference in improvement of QoL., Conclusions: Patients experienced improved QoL during PAS-LAR, either as monotherapy or in combination with PEGV. Soluble Klotho concentrations appear to be a useful marker of QoL in acromegaly patients but the underlying mechanisms remain to be investigated.

Objective: T2-signal intensity and somatostatin (SST) receptor expression are recognized predictors of therapy response in acromegaly. We investigated the relationship between these predictors and the hormonal and tumoral responses to long-acting pasireotide (PAS-LAR) therapy, which were also compared with responsiveness to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs)., Design: The PAPE study is a cohort study., Methods: We included 45 acromegaly patients initially receiving SRLs, followed by combination therapy with pegvisomant, and finally PAS-LAR. We assessed tumor volume reduction (≥25% from baseline), IGF-1 levels (expressed as the upper limit of normal), and T2-weighted MRI signal and SST receptor expression of the adenoma., Results: Patients with significant tumor shrinkage during PAS-LAR showed higher IGF-1 levels during PAS-LAR (mean (S.D.): 1.36 (0.53) vs 0.93 (0.43), P = 0.020), less IGF-1 reduction after first-generation SRLs (mean (S.D.): 0.55 (0.71) vs 1.25 (1.07), P = 0.028), and lower SST2 receptor expression (median (IQR): 2.0 (1.0-6.0) vs 12.0 (7.5-12.0), P = 0.040). Overall, T2-signal intensity ratio was increased compared with baseline (mean (S.D.): 1.39 (0.56) vs 1.25 (0.52), P = 0.017) and a higher T2-signal was associated with lower IGF-1 levels during PAS-LAR (β: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.01, P = 0.045). A subset of PAS-LAR treated patients with increased T2-signal intensity achieved greater reduction of IGF-1 (mean (S.D.): 0.80 (0.60) vs 0.45 (0.39), P = 0.016)., Conclusions: Patients unresponsive to SRLs with a lower SST2 receptor expression are more prone to achieve tumor shrinkage during PAS-LAR. Surprisingly, tumor shrinkage is not accompanied by a biochemical response, which is accompanied with a higher T2-signal intensity.

Objective: Excess of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), as in acromegaly, is associated with increased risk of diabetes, but whether retinal vessels are altered is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate retinal vessel morphology in patients with acromegaly at diagnosis and after treatment and to describe the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with long-standing acromegaly and diabetes., Design: Two independent observational studies, one being prospective and the other retrospective and cross-sectional., Methods: Retinal vessel morphology of 26 patients with acromegaly was examined at diagnosis and 1 year after treatment and compared to 13 healthy controls. Cross-sectional evaluation of 39 patients with long-standing acromegaly and diabetes was performed. Fundus photographs were digitally analyzed for vessel morphology., Results: Patients with acromegaly had a median (interquartile range) of 34.3 (30.0-39.0) vessel branching points compared to 27.0 (24.0-29.0) for healthy controls (P < 0.001). Tortuosity of arterioles and venules remained unchanged. Vessel morphology did not change significantly after treatment. Patients with acromegaly and diabetes for a median of 14 years also had a high number of branching points (34.2 (32.5-35.6)), but the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was not higher than expected in diabetic patients without acromegaly., Conclusions: Patients with acromegaly have an increased number of vascular branching points in the retina without an alteration of macroscopic vessel morphology. This is consistent with an angiogenic effect of GH/IGF-1 in humans. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was not increased in patients with acromegaly and diabetes.

Context: Pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) is a somatostatin multireceptor ligand, and in the current consensus criteria pasireotide LAR is considered the second-line medical treatment for acromegaly. We present in this article our recommendations to define the position of pasireotide LAR in the treatment of acromegaly and provide recommendations for the management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia., Evidence Acquisition: Our recommendations are based on our experiences with the pasireotide LAR and pegvisomant (PEGV) combination study and the available basic or clinical articles published in peer-reviewed international journals on pasireotide LAR and acromegaly., Evidence Synthesis: In accordance with the current consensus criteria, we recommend pasireotide LAR monotherapy as a second-line therapy in young patients who show tumor growth during first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy and in patients who show tumor growth during PEGV therapy. In addition, we recommend pasireotide LAR monotherapy in patients with headache not responsive to first-generation SRL therapy and in patients who experience side effects or are intolerant to PEGV monotherapy. In contrast to the current consensus criteria, we recommend considering combination therapy with pasireotide LAR and PEGV as third-line treatment in patients without diabetes at low PEGV dosages (≤80 mg/week) and in patients with tumor growth or symptoms of active acromegaly during first-generation SRL and PEGV combination therapy. With respect to pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia, we recommend a more liberal strategy of blood glucose monitoring during pasireotide treatment., Conclusions: In contrast to the current consensus criteria, we recommend a more reluctant use of pasireotide LAR therapy for the treatment of acromegaly., (Copyright © 2019 Endocrine Society.)

Background: The response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) treatment in acromegaly correlates with expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2). However, pasireotide shows the highest binding affinity for SSTR subtype 5 (SSTR5). It has been suggested that in acromegaly, SSTR5 expression is better at predicting the response to pasireotide long-acting release (PAS-LAR) treatment than SSTR2 expression., Aim: To investigate in patients with active acromegaly whether response to SRL treatment correlates to PAS-LAR treatment and to what extent SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression are correlated to the response to PAS-LAR treatment., Methods: We included 52 patients from a cohort that initially received SRL treatment, followed by SRL and pegvisomant combination treatment, and finally PAS-LAR treatment. The long-term response to PAS-LAR was evaluated using a PAS-LAR score. In 14 out of 52 patients, somatotroph adenoma tissue samples were available to evaluate SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression using a previously validated immunoreactivity score (IRS)., Results: The percentage IGF-I (times the upper limit of normal) reduction, which was observed after SRL treatment, correlated with PAS-LAR response score during follow-up (r = 0.40; P = 0.003; n = 52). After exclusion of SRL-pretreated patients, SSTR2 IRS was positively correlated to PAS-LAR score (r = 0.58; P = 0.039; n = 9), whereas SSTR5 IRS showed no relation (r = 0.35; P = 0.36; n = 9)., Conclusions: In a cohort of patients partially responsive to SRLs, the IGF-I-lowering effects of PAS-LAR treatment correlated with the effect of SRL treatment and seemed to be mainly driven by SSTR2 expression instead of SSTR5.

Objective: to assess the efficacy and safety after 48 weeks of treatment with pasireotide long-acting-release (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly. In addition, we assessed the relation between insulin secretion and pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia., Design: The PAPE extension study is a prospective follow-up study until 48 weeks after the core study of 24 weeks., Methods: 59 out of 61 patients entered the extension study. Efficacy was defined as the percentage of patients achieving IGF-I normalization (≤ 1.2 x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)) at 48-weeks through protocol-based adjustment of pegvisomant and PAS-LAR doses. At baseline, insulin secretion was assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)., Results: At the end of the study median IGF-I was 0.98 x ULN, and 77% of patients achieved normal IGF-I levels with a mean pegvisomant dose of 64 mg/week, and an overall cumulative pegvisomant dose reduction of 52%. Frequency of diabetes mellitus increased from 68% at 24 weeks to 77% at 48 weeks, and 9 patients discontinued PAS-LAR treatment, mainly because of severe hyperglycemia. Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia was inversely correlated with baseline insulin secretion (r = -0.37, P < 0.005)., Conclusions: PAS-LAR normalizes IGF-I levels in most acromegaly patients, with a fifty percent pegvisomant-sparing effect. However, PAS-LAR treatment coincided with a high incidence of diabetes mellitus. The risk for developing diabetes during PAS-LAR treatment seems inversely related to insulin secretion at baseline., (© 2018 European Society of Endocrinology)

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of pasireotide long-acting release (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with pegvisomant by switching patients with acromegaly who were well controlled with long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) and pegvisomant to PAS-LAR with or without pegvisomant., Methods: Sixty-one patients with acromegaly were enrolled in a prospective open-label study. We included patients with an insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) ≤1.2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) during treatment with LA-SSAs and pegvisomant. At baseline, the pegvisomant dose was reduced by 50% up to 12 weeks. When IGF-I remained ≤1.2 × ULN after 12 weeks, patients were switched to PAS-LAR 60 mg monotherapy. When IGF-I was >1.2 × ULN, patients were switched to PAS-LAR 60 mg, and they continued with the 50% reduced pegvisomant dose., Results: At baseline, mean IGF-I was 0.97 × ULN, and the median pegvisomant dose was 80 mg/wk. At 12 weeks, mean IGF-I increased to 1.59 × ULN, and IGF-I levels ≤1.2 ULN were observed in 24.6% of participants. At 24 weeks, IGF-I levels were reduced into the reference range in 73.8% of patients. Between baseline and 24 weeks, the pegvisomant dose was reduced by 66.1%. PAS-LAR was well tolerated, but hyperglycemia was the most frequent adverse event. The frequency of diabetes increased from 32.8% at baseline to 68.9% at 24 weeks., Conclusions: Switching to PAS-LAR, either as monotherapy or combination with pegvisomant, can control IGF-I levels in most patients. PAS-LAR demonstrated a pegvisomant-sparing effect of 66% compared with the combination with LA-SSAs. Hyperglycemia was the most important safety issue., (Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society)

Acromegaly is a rare disorder caused by chronic growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion. While diagnostic and therapeutic methods have advanced, little information exists on trends in acromegaly characteristics over time. The Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database , a relational database, is designed to assess the profile of acromegaly patients at diagnosis and during long-term follow-up at multiple treatment centers. The following results were obtained at diagnosis. The study population consisted of 3173 acromegaly patients from ten countries; 54.5% were female. Males were significantly younger at diagnosis than females (43.5 vs 46.4 years; P  < 0.001). The median delay from first symptoms to diagnosis was 2 years longer in females ( P  = 0.015). Ages at diagnosis and first symptoms increased significantly over time ( P  < 0.001). Tumors were larger in males than females ( P  < 0.001); tumor size and invasion were inversely related to patient age ( P  < 0.001). Random GH at diagnosis correlated with nadir GH levels during OGTT ( P  < 0.001). GH was inversely related to age in both sexes ( P  < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was present in 27.5%, hypertension in 28.8%, sleep apnea syndrome in 25.5% and cardiac hypertrophy in 15.5%. Serious cardiovascular outcomes like stroke, heart failure and myocardial infarction were present in <5% at diagnosis. Erythrocyte levels were increased and correlated with IGF-1 values. Thyroid nodules were frequent (34.0%); 820 patients had colonoscopy at diagnosis and 13% had polyps. Osteoporosis was present at diagnosis in 12.3% and 0.6-4.4% had experienced a fracture. In conclusion, this study of >3100 patients is the largest international acromegaly database and shows clinically relevant trends in the characteristics of acromegaly at diagnosis., (© 2017 The authors.)

Background: Data on plasma acylated ghrelin (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) levels in acromegaly are limited. High AG/UAG ratios are linked with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hyperphagia (e.g., in Prader-Willi syndrome)., Objective: To assess fasting plasma AG and UAG levels, and the AG/UAG ratio in acromegaly patients receiving combination treatment of long-acting somatostatin analogs (LA-SSAs) and pegvisomant (PEGV; n = 60). We used as controls acromegaly patients whose disease was controlled with PEGV monotherapy and medically naïve patients with active acromegaly., Methods: Fasting venous blood samples were collected and directly stabilized to inhibit deacylation of AG. Plasma AG and UAG levels were determined by double-antibody sandwich enzyme immunoassay, and the AG/UAG ratio was calculated., Results: Plasma AG and UAG levels were significantly lower in patients with acromegaly receiving combination treatment [median, interquartile range (IQR): AG: 8.5 pg/mL, 2.9 to 21.1 pg/mL; UAG: 26.9 pg/mL, 11.2 to 42.1 pg/mL] compared with patients using PEGV alone [AG: 60.5 pg/mL (IQR, 58.8 to 77.4 pg/mL); UAG: 153.7 pg/mL (IQR, 127.3 to 196.0 pg/mL)] and medically naïve patients with acromegaly [AG: 24.0 pg/mL (IQR, 12.6 to 49.7 pg/mL); UAG: 56.3 pg/mL (IQR, 43.4 to 61.5 pg/mL)]. However, AG/UAG ratios were similar in all groups., Conclusions: Although plasma AG and UAG are suppressed during combination treatment with LA-SSAs and PEGV, the AG/UAG ratio remained similar. This shows that SSAs decrease both AG and UAG levels, which suggests that they do not alter metabolism significantly in acromegaly patients., (Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society)

Background: The common exon 3 deletion polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor (d3-GHR) is associated with disease severity in acromegaly patients. The GHR antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV) is highly effective in treating severe acromegaly. Response to PEGV treatment seems to be influenced by d3-GHR and appears to be more responsive to PEGV, although available results remain conflicting., Objective: To assess the influence of d3-GHR on the responsiveness of acromegaly patients to PEGV by compiling the evidence derived from the largest available studies., Design: A systematic review of the literature identified three published studies and one conference abstract. Acromegaly patients (n = 324, 49.7% d3-GHR carriers) were treated with either PEGV monotherapy or PEGV combined with long-acting somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. A meta-analysis of raw data from these studies was performed., Results: No significant effect of the d3-GHR was observed while bringing insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels below the upper limit of normal with PEGV, which was defined as the lowest IGF-I level during PEGV treatment (mean difference: -2.3%; 95% CI: -6.5 to 1.8, p = 0.270). The PEGV dose required to achieve the lowest IGF-I levels was also not significantly influenced by individuals carrying d3-GHR (mean difference: 4.1 mg weekly; 95% CI: -5.1 to 13.2, p = 0.385). For both outcomes, separate analysis of PEGV monotherapy and combination treatment gave similar results., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the d3-GHR polymorphism has no effect on biochemical disease control in acromegaly, as it is not of added value for either the prediction of PEGV responsiveness or the determination of the required PEGV dose., (© 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: The high expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2 also known as sst2) usually present in growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas is the rationale for therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in acromegaly. Although SSTR2 expression is a good predictor for biochemical response to SSA treatment, we still face tumors resistant to SSAs despite high SSTR2 expression. Recently, beta-arrestins (β-arrestins) have been highlighted as key players in the regulation of SSTR2 function., Design: To investigate whether β-arrestins might be useful predictors of responsiveness to long-term SSA treatment in acromegaly, we retrospectively evaluated 35 patients with acromegaly who underwent adenomectomy in two referral centers in The Netherlands., Methods: β-arrestin mRNA levels were evaluated in adenoma samples, together with SSTR2 (and SSTR5) mRNA and protein expression. Biochemical response to long-term SSA treatment (median 12 months) was assessed in 32 patients., Results: β-arrestin 1 and 2 mRNA was significantly lower in adenoma tissues from patients who achieved insulin-like growth factor 1 normalization (P = 0.024 and P = 0.047) and complete biochemical control (P = 0.047 and P = 0.039). The SSTR2 mRNA was higher in SSA responder patients compared with the resistant ones (P = 0.026). This difference was more evident when analyzing the SSTR2/β-arrestin 1 and SSTR2/β-arrestin 2 ratio (P = 0.011 and P = 0.010). β-arrestin 1 and 2 expression showed a significant trend of higher median values from full responders, partial responders to resistant patients (P = 0.045 and P = 0.021, respectively). Interestingly, SSTR2 protein expression showed a strong inverse correlation with both β-arrestin 1 and 2 mRNA (ρ = -0.69, P = 0.0011 and ρ = -0.67, P = 0.0016)., Conclusions: Low β-arrestin expression and high SSTR2/β-arrestin ratio correlate with the responsiveness to long-term treatment with SSAs in patients with acromegaly., (© 2016 European Society of Endocrinology.)

Historically, medical treatment of acromegaly has mainly been used as an adjuvant therapy after surgery. In the last decades, an increased range of medical therapy options has been available. Somatostatin analogues have become the cornerstones of medical treatment in acromegaly and are even seen as a primary treatment in a selected group of acromegaly patients. The most recent medical treatment available for acromegaly patients is pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. To date, it is the most effective medical treatment, but it is costly. Pegvisomant is used as monotherapy and combined with somatostatin analogues. In this article, we review clinical studies and cohorts that have documented the efficacy of pegvisomant monotherapy and combined therapy and give a concise overview of associated side effects., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Despite being a classical growth disorder, pituitary gigantism has not been studied previously in a standardized way. We performed a retrospective, multicenter, international study to characterize a large series of pituitary gigantism patients. We included 208 patients (163 males; 78.4%) with growth hormone excess and a current/previous abnormal growth velocity for age or final height >2 s.d. above country normal means. The median onset of rapid growth was 13 years and occurred significantly earlier in females than in males; pituitary adenomas were diagnosed earlier in females than males (15.8 vs 21.5 years respectively). Adenomas were ≥10 mm (i.e., macroadenomas) in 84%, of which extrasellar extension occurred in 77% and invasion in 54%. GH/IGF1 control was achieved in 39% during long-term follow-up. Final height was greater in younger onset patients, with larger tumors and higher GH levels. Later disease control was associated with a greater difference from mid-parental height (r=0.23, P=0.02). AIP mutations occurred in 29%; microduplication at Xq26.3 - X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG) - occurred in two familial isolated pituitary adenoma kindreds and in ten sporadic patients. Tumor size was not different in X-LAG, AIP mutated and genetically negative patient groups. AIP-mutated and X-LAG patients were significantly younger at onset and diagnosis, but disease control was worse in genetically negative cases. Pituitary gigantism patients are characterized by male predominance and large tumors that are difficult to control. Treatment delay increases final height and symptom burden. AIP mutations and X-LAG explain many cases, but no genetic etiology is seen in >50% of cases., (© 2015 Society for Endocrinology.)

Objective: To evaluate extended dosing intervals (EDIs) with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg in patients with acromegaly previously biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg., Design and Methods: Patients with acromegaly had received octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks for ≥ 6 months and had normal IGF1 levels. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg was administered every 6 weeks for 24 weeks (phase 1); depending on week-24 IGF1 levels, treatment was then administered every 4, 6 or 8 weeks for a further 24 weeks (phase 2). Hormone levels, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events were assessed., Primary Endpoint: proportion of patients on 6- or 8-week EDIs with normal IGF1 levels at week 48 (study end)., Results: 107/124 patients completed the study (15 withdrew from phase 1 and two from phase 2). Of 124 patients enrolled, 77.4% were allocated to 6- or 8-week EDIs in phase 2 and 75.8% (95% CI: 68.3-83.3) had normal IGF1 levels at week 48 with the EDI (primary analysis). A total of 88.7% (83.1-94.3) had normal IGF1 levels after 24 weeks with 6-weekly dosing. GH levels were ≤ 2.5 μg/l in > 90% of patients after 24 and 48 weeks. Patient preferences for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 4, 6 or 8 weeks over octreotide LAR every 4 weeks were high., Conclusions: Patients with acromegaly achieving biochemical control with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks are possible candidates for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg EDIs. EDIs are effective and well received among such patients., (© 2015 European Society of Endocrinology.)

Recent in vitro studies highlighted G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)2 and β-arrestins as important players in driving somatostatin receptor (SSTR) desensitization and trafficking. Our aim was to characterize GRK2 and β-arrestins expression in different pituitary adenomas and to investigate their potential role in the response to somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment in GH-secreting adenomas (GHomas). We evaluated mRNA expression of multiple SSTRs, GRK2, β-arrestin 1, and β-arrestin 2 in 41 pituitary adenomas (31 GHomas, 6 nonfunctioning [NFPAs], and 4 prolactinomas [PRLomas]). Within the GHomas group, mRNA data were correlated with the in vivo response to an acute octreotide test and with the GH-lowering effect of SSA in cultured primary cells. β-Arrestin 1 expression was low in all 3 adenoma histotypes. However, its expression was significantly lower in GHomas and PRLomas, compared with NFPAs (P < .01). GRK2 expression was higher in PRLomas and NFPAs compared with GHomas (P < .05). In the GHoma group, GRK2 expression was inversely correlated to β-arrestin 1 (P < .05) and positively correlated to β-arrestin 2 (P < .0001). SSA treatment did not affect GRK2 and β-arrestin expression in GHomas or in cultured rat pituitary tumor GH3 cells. Noteworthy, β-arrestin 1 was significantly lower (P < .05) in tumors responsive to octreotide treatment in vitro, whereas GRK2 and SSTR subtype 2 were significantly higher (P < .05). Likewise, β-arrestin 1 levels were inversely correlated with the in vivo response to acute octreotide test (P = .001), whereas GRK2 and SSTR subtype 2 expression were positively correlated (P < .05). In conclusion, for the first time, we characterized GRK2, β-arrestin 1, and β-arrestin 2 expression in a representative number of pituitary adenomas. β-Arrestin 1 and GRK2 seem to have a role in modulating GH secretion during SSA treatment.

Context: Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2A) protein expression has been demonstrated to positively correlate with somatostatin analog treatment outcome in GH-secreting adenomas. Recently, a new rabbit monoclonal anti-sst2A antibody (clone UMB-1) has been validated as a reliable method to selectively detect sst2A protein levels in formalin-fixed tissues., Objective: The aim of the study was to establish whether the evaluation of sst2A protein levels, assessed with a routine reproducible immunohistochemistry protocol using UMB-1 antibody, may predict the successful adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogs in acromegalic patients., Design, Setting, and Patients: Thirty-six acromegalic patients from our referral hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Sst2A expression analysis was performed by immunohistochemistry in 25 patients and by quantitative RT-PCR in 26 patients. Sst2A immunoreactivity was evaluated using an immunoreactivity score (IRS), which takes into account both the percentage of positive cells and staining intensity., Interventions: Patients with persistent disease after surgery (n = 26) were treated with somatostatin analogs for a median duration of 6 months., Main Outcome Measure: GH and IGF-I levels were measured before and after postoperative treatment., Results: Sst2A IRS showed a significant positive correlation with both GH (P = 0.039) and IGF-I (P = 0.001) suppression by octreotide. Sst2A IRS was negatively associated with IGF-I levels reached after treatment (P = 0.001), and patients that achieved IGF-I normalization showed significantly higher sst2A IRS compared to the group that was not normalized (P = 0.002). A sst2A IRS of at least 5 showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 91% in predicting IGF-I normalization during adjuvant octreotide treatment., Conclusion: Sst2A IRS with the anti-sst2A antibody UMB-1 represents a valid tool in the clinical practice to identify acromegalic patients likely to be responders to adjuvant therapy with the currently available somatostatin analogs.

The efficacy of combined treatment in active acromegaly with both long-acting somatostatin analogs (SRIF) and pegvisomant (PEG-V) has been well established. The aim was to describe the PEG-V dose reductions after the conversion from daily PEG-V to combination treatment. To clarify the individual beneficial and adverse effects, in two acromegaly patients, who only normalized their insulin like growth factor (IGF-I) levels with high-dose pegvisomant therapy. We present two cases of a 31 and 44 years old male with gigantism and acromegaly that were controlled subsequently by surgery, radiotherapy, SRIF analogs and daily PEG-V treatment. They were converted to combined treatment of monthly SSA and (twice) weekly PEG-V. High dose SSA treatment was added while the PEG-V dose was decreased during carful monitoring of the IGF-I. After switching from PEG-V monotherapy to SRIF analogs plus pegvisomant combination therapy IGF-I remained normal. However, the necessary PEG-V dose, to normalize IGF-I differed significantly between these two patients. One patient needed twice weekly 100 mg, the second needed 60 mg once weekly on top of their monthly lanreotide Autosolution injections of 120 mg. The weekly dose reduction was 80 and 150 mg. After the introducing of lanreotide, fasting glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin concentrations increased. Diabetic medication had to be introduced or increased. No changes in liver tests or in pituitary adenoma size were observed. In these two patients, PEG-V in combination with long-acting SRIF analogs was as effective as PEG-V monotherapy in normalizing IGF-I levels, although significant dose-reductions in PEG-V could be achieved. However, there seems to be a wide variation in the reduction of PEG-V dose, which can be obtained after conversion to combined treatment.

Background: We previously reported the efficacy of a combined treatment of active acromegaly with both long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) and pegvisomant (PEG-V)., Objective: Our objective was to assess long-term efficacy and safety in a larger group of acromegalic patients after a period of 138 (35-149) wk [median (range)]., Design: PEG-V was added to high-dose SSA treatment in 32 subjects (13 females) who had not shown a normalization in serum IGF-I concentrations during SSA monotherapy. PEG-V dosage was increased until IGF-I concentration normalized. The maximal dose was 80 mg twice weekly., Results: After dose finding, IGF-I remained within the normal range in all subjects with PEG-V administered once (n = 24) or twice (n = 8) weekly, on a total weekly dose of 60 (40-160) mg. Baseline IGF-I levels were positively correlated with the required dosage of PEG-V (r = 0.48; P = 0.006). PEG-V-dependent liver enzyme disturbances were observed in 11 (6 diabetic) subjects, of which symptomatic gallstones explained two cases. These liver enzyme disturbances were transient in all subjects without discontinuation or dose adaptation of PEG-V. In our series, diabetic patients had a 5.1 times (odds ratio) (confidence interval, 1.02-25.54; P < 0.05) higher risk for developing liver enzyme disturbances. These liver enzyme disturbances seemed to occur earlier. Pituitary adenoma size decreased in four patients. No increase in tumor size was observed in any of the patients., Conclusion: Long-term combined treatment with long-acting SSA and (twice) weekly PEG-V for active acromegaly seems to be effective and safe. Patients with acromegaly and diabetes seem to have a higher risk of developing transient liver enzyme disturbances.

This review intends to provide the reader with a practical overview of several (patho)physiological conditions in which knowledge of the interplay between growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and insulin is important. This might help treating physicians in making the right decisions on how to intervene and improve metabolism for the benefit of patients, and to understand why and how metabolism responds in their specific cases. We will specifically address the interplay between GH, IGF-1, and insulin in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, and acromegaly as examples in which this knowledge is truly necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a common complication in survivors of cancer and patients with tumors of the pituitary region. Growth hormone replacement therapy (GHT) has proven beneficial effects, including increased growth velocity, positive effects on body composition and skeletal integrity, and increased quality of life. However, due to known pro-proliferative, angiogenic, and anti-apoptotic properties of growth hormone, there are still some concerns about the safety of GHT in survivors. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the long-term sequelae, and subsequently long-term safety, of GHT in survivors of (childhood) cancer and patients with tumors of the pituitary region. We identified predominantly reassuring results regarding the safety of survivors with GHT, although we must take into account the shortcomings of some studies and limited information on adult cancer survivors. Besides the already increased risk for second neoplasms, recurrences, or mortality in survivors due to host-, disease-, and treatmentrelated factors, we could not identify an increased risk due to GHT in particular. Therefore, we support the consensus that GHT can be considered in survivors after careful individual risk/benefit analysis and in open discussion with the patients and their families, taking into account the known morbidity of untreated GHD in cancer survivors and the positive effects of GHT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]