Search

Copyright of International Journal of Professional Business Review (JPBReview) is the property of Open Access Publications LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental & Social Management Journal / Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental is the property of Environmental & Social Management Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The concept of justice, discussed since the beginning of the so-called Greek city-states, has generated debates about what can be considered fair or unfair, as well as whether the conception of justice is capable of being appropriated by the entire society or only to certain groups. privileged social groups, therefore, if the "political animal" defended by Aristotle or the contractualist proposals are capable of being fully exercised by society. Thus, there is a discussion of norms and institutional structures that aim to enable mechanisms for access to justice. Naturalist and contractualist theorists recognize that equality is one of the fundamental goals of society. Such equality, however, is debatable, as well as whether the position of citizen and sovereign people has been taken over by the breadth of society, so that the natural condition of living in society or the act of renouncing part of one's own right for the good common has been made possible by access to justice. There was a theoretical discussion of naturalist and contractualist conceptions and an analysis of mechanisms for access to justice. Even though important mechanisms have been implemented, such as public defender's offices, free procedural assistance, itinerant justice, means of procedural speed, collective actions, self-composed guardianships and constitutional remedies, it has been observed that there is not complete access to jurisdiction, in order to favor the equality defended by naturalist and contractualist theorists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Lex Humana is the property of Lex Humana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The research proposes to investigate the effectiveness of pre-processual conciliation as a means to promote access to justice and alleviate the overload of the judicial system, focusing on cases of vehicle repossession with fiduciary alienation in the Court of Justice of the State of Ceará (CJCE). To achieve this objective, a qualitative approach is adopted through bibliographic review, with critical analysis of academic literature, legal publications, and official documents. The study is structured into three main topics: analysis of the right of access to justice, conciliation and mediation as conflict resolution methods, and results of relevant studies. Expected outcomes include a deep understanding of pre-processual conciliation and its applicability in the mentioned cases, contributing to the promotion of peaceful, rapid, and satisfactory solutions, as well as expanding access to the justice system. The research aims to provide theoretical and practical support for the effective adoption of pre-processual conciliation in the legal context of CJCE, contributing to a more appropriate administration of conflicts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The social changes felt by the modern world have awakened in man the desire to realize rights, which will result in changes in the defining contours of the concept of access to justice. In turn, this evolution of the understanding of access to justice in Brazil will have a direct impact on the Judiciary, especially given the persistent demand culture. Add to this the implementation of rushed practices, both by the Judiciary itself and by the Legislative Branch, which, in an attempt to provide rapid responses to society's demands, further suffocate the already dying justice system. Thus, the present research aims to stimulate academic discussions about a possible crisis in the Judiciary as a result of the expansion of the defining boundaries of access to justice. In short, the aim is to: bring together some considerations about the expansion of the concept of access to justice in contemporary Brazil and stimulate reflection on the crisis faced by the Judiciary based on the polysemy of this guarantee. This is bibliographical research, promoted under the critical socio-legal method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The search of criminal accountability for individuals who have committed domestic and family violence is a central demand of victimized women, and the Public Defender's Office plays a relevant role in criminal proceedings for their access to justice. The main objective of this study is to identify the perceptions, needs and expectations of women in relation to criminal proceedings, to identify the possibilities of action of the Public Defender's Office in this scenario and to assess the challenges faced by the institution to ensure the effectiveness of the performance in these processes. Based on the documentary analysis of the research “The Judiciary Power in confronting domestic and family violence” (CNJ; IPEA, 2019), as well as the literature review, it was sought to contribute to the improvement of the policies and institutional practices of the Public Defender's Office in criminal cases involving women in situations of domestic and family violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The desire of the Code of Civil Procedure/15 to strengthen access to justice is notorious, especially through the provisions concerning the benefit of free justice. Based on this observation, an analysis of the results of the current system is sought, as well as the possibility of increasing the effects of the aforementioned benefit, through statistical analysis. Therefore, using the hypothetical-deductive method, the possibility of extending the benefit of free justice is questioned, so that it reaches a greater number of beneficiaries, as determined by law. It is concluded that it is possible to strengthen the benefit, so that Justice as a public service promotes better service to the population's needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Estudios Socio-Jurídicos is the property of Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Senora del Rosario and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito is the property of JURUA EDITORIAL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito is the property of JURUA EDITORIAL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The purpose of the article is to highlight the situation of courts operation’s organization in the period of the martial law and the construction of legal framework on using modern information technologies in the administration of justice. The research has been carried out with the usage of the methods of systemic analysis and synthesis, comparative and legal, historical and legal methods. It has been clarified that Ukraine rather effectively ensures the proper organization of courts operation and administration of justice in terms of the martial law considering the level of security in each region. It has been indicated that the organization of remote work of judges and other court employees, as well as the administration of justice online through the use of video conferencing is the positive solution in war period. Such a step contributes to strengthening the security of all participants in judicial proceedings. It has been substantiated that the use of video conferencing during court hearings meets the requirements of a fair and public trial ensuring the compliance with the guarantees of access to justice. It has been emphasized that the use of information technologies within judicial proceedings should have a single approach. Therefore, it is important to develop uniform rules regarding methodological ensuring the use of modern information technologies in the administration of justice in the period of the martial law in order to improve the organization of courts operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The following research is linked to the Bryant Garth Research Observatory, created in 2020 at the Rio de Janeiro State School of Magistrates (EMERJ). The Observatory developed a data production model to guide legal public policies, with the first empirical research developed within the scope of one of its centers, the Nucleus of Public Policies and Access to Justice (NUPEPAJ), held in 2021 in the aim of investigating the impact of name and gender change on the lives of trans people. The research was undertaken by means of collecting secondary data – in court cases – and primary data – from interviews with the subjects of these cases, with the categorized and analyzed data then discussed in this work. The results suggest that gender, age group, education, and violence impact the seeking out of this service and also how a name and gender change affects expectations of a life free of violence and with more opportunities for happiness. Based on debates on transfeminism and an expanded perspective on gender, we question the limits and possibilities for a construction of emancipatory practices by the Judicial Power in dialogue with other institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present work consists in studying the Brazilian legislation and those that hinder its application and the application material, more precisely how to relate the guarantee of access to justice. It deals with aspects related to symbolic legislation and what is the symbolic constitution and social function of the state in maintaining the right of access to justice. We sought to bring an analysis and definition of the terminology constitutional symbolism, as well as aspects related to the social functions of the state in application of law with emphasis on the fundamental and social requirements applicable in the Federal Constitution. It is added to the object of study of verification of the application of the right of access to justice, as a form of inclusion and normative ineffectiveness in the effective application of the institute. Visit the analysis of the normative legal applicability in contemporary times and the implication of the political field in the effectiveness of the materialization of rights and their influence on the procrastination of dilatory commitments and promises. Through this study, which shows the political aspect of constitutional names or, consequently, brings new modulations to social status, it is important to emphasize that it is up to the State to create mechanisms that effectively facilitate the normative application of the institute or the analysis and analysis, mainly to the population in compliance with the rules and choice of legislators. The methodological development consists of bibliographic analyzes using the analytical-synthetic method and follows as line of research the Social Function of Law and Interculturality, subarea Social Rights and Public Policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Judiciary plays a crucial role in promoting the Democratic Rule of Law and in resolving controversies and social challenges. However, by referring most conflicts for judicial analysis, there is a missed opportunity to address them more appropriately, given that many would be better resolved through consensual solutions. Such an approach demands qualified professionals, equipped with vital negotiation skills such as empathy, resilience, creativity, innovation, and cooperation. Beyond technical expertise, these abilities, termed soft skills, are an essential competitive differentiator in an ever-evolving job market. This research employed a literature and documentation review to explore the relationship between the skills of conflict managers, vital for ensuring access to justice, and the skills demanded by the 21stcentury job market, seen as opportunities for lawyers. The adopted methodology was descriptive and exploratory, resulting in an explanatory view. The findings showed that the aforementioned skills align with the essential characteristics of an effective mediator. Thus, it's evident that the modern lawyer's role extends beyond mere legal application; they must also be problem solvers. Given this, it's vital to seek strategies that develop the necessary skills for this professional, preparing them to meet market demands and the complex dynamics of human relations, ultimately ensuring a significant social impact on access to justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The access to justice principle is in line with the understanding of the Democratic Rule of Law in current democracies, in which the conception of the State emphasizes respect and constitutionalizing of human rights, observing the principles of human dignity and access to justice. These principles after setbacks arising from periods of authoritarianism in the country, are the essence of the Brazilian legal system and the guidelines guiding the State's actions, both in the legislative functions, as well as in the executive and judicial functions, and should guide the formulation and execution of public policies. This essay establishes a discussion that seeks to verify whether the principle of human dignity, constitutionally foreseen, can be identified in a specific public policy that is the responsibility of the Judiciary- that of adequate treatment of conflicts of interest. The methodological path chosen to approach the problem is historical and inductive, as it seeks to identify the meaning of human dignity in Brazilian history, relating it to the realization of human/fundamental rights. By observing the relationship between phenomena, hypotheses (provisional truths) are verified based on the observed relationships. With the method of procedure that characterizes exploratory, historical and bibliographical and normative research, a theoretical framework is constructed capable of providing answers to the questions posed, providing more familiarity with the problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this article is to carry out a critical analysis about the insertion of Artificial Intelligence in the contemporary legal system, mainly on the influence that this can generate on the constitutional principle of access to justice, through the experiences obtained by the Federal Supreme Court - STF. The methodology used will be hypothetical deductive, through empirical and theoretical evidence. Furthermore, this article makes use of qualitative and quantitative data in order to endorse the presented hypothesis. The results obtained were that the use of artificial intelligence has great potential to collaborate with the activities of the Judiciary, in view of its current structure, with artificial intelligence not being used as a tool to replace people, but as a form of assistance that is potentially capable of to reduce working time and consequently the number of cases pending judgment before the Judiciary. In this way, it was concluded that artificial intelligence, as long as it is applied in a thoughtful way, should be inserted in the national courts as a means of guaranteeing access to justice and effective judicial provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Estudios de Derecho is the property of Estudios de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Lex Humana is the property of Lex Humana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Quaestio Iuris (QI) is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Precedente is the property of Universidad ICESI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Investigates if in the scope of small claims courts, considering the peculiarities of the system, there is a violation of access to justice through judicial order of submission the consumer disputes to the attempt of prior resolution on the consumer.gov.br website. Adopts a hypothetical-deductive approach, with qualitative and descriptive research, carrying out a bibliographic review of scientific articles and doctrinal works, in addition to collecting information in relevant databases according to the matter. Concludes that sending cases of the small claims courts to the compulsory negotiation in the service provided by Consumidor.gov.br, instead of representing a violation of access to justice, constitutes an opportunity for its amplification, considering the promotion of greater overall effectiveness of the microsystem. Thus, it contributed to a better definition of the edges of the access to justice in the small claims courts, presenting an alternative to improve the system's results and to bring it back to its primordial scope of agile and effective conflict resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Quaestio Iuris (QI) is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Social evolution in the face of technological advances has generated major transformations in the Judiciary, especially with the evolution of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as an alternative means of guaranteeing access to justice. The objective of the research is to analyze whether only technological and alternative means of conflict resolution guarantee full access to justice, based on the review of the first and third renewal waves by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth. The methodology used presents a qualitative approach, deductive method and exploratory character. The results indicate that technological vulnerability must be investigated so that effective proposals can be formulated to guarantee effective access to justice. It is not enough for the Judiciary to provide means of access to Justice without guaranteeing that the jurisdiction is able to follow these evolutions and, in this way, guarantee substantial and effective access to justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With Law N. 11.419/2006, addressing the computerization of the judicial process, the CNJ Resolution nº 185/2013 making the electronic process mandatory and the CPC/2015 addressing the electronic practice of procedural acts, a way was opened for the implementation of a process digital. The route until then timid changed strongly when the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. To continue its activities, the Judiciary was forced to rethink the law digitally. In this context, aiming at wide access to justice and the reasonable duration of the process, the “Juízo 100% Digital” (Res. CNJ No. 345/2020) emerged, in which all procedural acts will be exclusively performed by electronic and remote means. It so happens that, even with the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet providing for the right of everyone to access the Internet (art. 4, I), the reality in Brazil is quite different, highlighting that in the Amazon region part of its population experiences a true “hiatus digital". In this perspective, from the analysis of access to justice, the present work aims to address the instrumentalization of judicial public in the implementation of the “Juízo 100% Digital” in the Labor Court in the Amazon of Pará (TRT8) as an instrument to satisfy the constitutional principle access to justice without amplifying the obstacles faced by those already experiencing a “digital divide”. The research was carried out using the hypothetical-deductive method, with a qualitative approach, in the form of bibliographic and documentary research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Essay about the challenges of access to justice in the sustainability context, based on the implementation of the electronic Judicial Process (PJe) by the National Council of Justice (CNJ). Through a bibliographical review, the objectives were to examine the transformations by the implementation of the PJe by the CNJ, the current conditions for the exercise of the public function by the justice system; then, through the doctrinal and legislative examination, it is intended to verify the challenges of the PJe related to the effectiveness of access to justice as a fundamental right, verifying the possibilities brought by this new procedural model related to sustainability, with a focus on the UN Agenda 2030. As a hypothesis, it appears that the PJe is a reality throughout the Judiciary, forcing the justice system to adapt, towards a new model of thinking about the material and procedural Law reality. As a result, it was found that effective access to justice - with the PJe - must be viewed rationally, recognizing the insufficiencies and limitations of judicial services, breaking obsolete paradigms in the pursuit of effective jurisdictional provision. It is a problem for the entire justice system and one that must be faced by each of its parts. Even with the challenges, the PJe presents itself as one of the instruments for expanding sustainable access to justice, making the processing of judicial proceedings more efficient, reducing the use of paper, the people and documents`displacement, increasing data transparency and citizen accessibility to the justice system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article, based on qualitative and analytical methodology and bibliographical research, aims to analyze the socio-legal impacts of technology on adequate methods of dispute resolution, from the perspective of the sixth renewal wave of access to justice. Therefore, the study begins with elucidations about access to justice. Therafter, it moves on to the approach about the evolution of the theme from the perspective of the reformulation of the renewal waves metaphor. In the end, it analyzes how technology impacts the appropriate methods of dispute resolution. In this context, it notes that the conception of access to justice has been changing over time, according to changes and social demands, with the idea of reformulating the renewal waves metaphor being relevant, especially with a focus on the sixth wave, which involves the theme of technology, which receives a central role, as a transforming and disruptive element, based on the projection of new forms, new methods of dispute resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Direito GV is the property of Fundacao Getulio Vargas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Direito GV is the property of Fundacao Getulio Vargas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Lex Humana is the property of Lex Humana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)