Search

Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. To compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (ZP; stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with an anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy. Summary of Background Data. Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. Although ACDFs performed with graft and plate have been the gold standard, more recently, ZP implants were developed to decrease implant-related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of ZP (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems. Materials and Methods. Data were extracted from the Pearl- Diver Mariner Database using Current Procedural Terminology codes to classify patients into 1 level, 2 levels, and a total of 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. Results. 1:1 exact matching created 2 equal groups of 7284 patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or ZP (stand-alone) implant. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia, or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (risk ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80--1.21, P = 0.95). In addition, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (risk ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.862--1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study. Conclusion. After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that ZP (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared with grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To compare the rates of all-cause surgical complications of synthetic interbody devices versus allograft or autograft in patients undergoing 1-2 levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Summary of Background Data: Cervical degenerative disorders affect up to 60% of older adults in the United States. Both traditional allograft or autograft and synthetic interbody devices (polyetheretherketone or titanium) are used for decompression and arthrodesis, with increasing utilization of the latter. However, the differences in their postsurgical complication profiles are not wellcharacterized. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies, such as tumors, trauma, or infection, were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed based on factors that were significant predictors of all-cause surgical complications in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was the development of all-cause surgical complications after 1-2 level ACDFs. The secondary outcome was all-cause medical complications. Results: 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 11,430 patients who received treatment with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autograft. No statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications was found between the synthetic cohort and the allograft or autograft cohort after 1-2 level ACDFs (Relative Risk: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.730–1.014, P = 0.079). No significant differences were observed regarding any specific surgical complications except for pseudoarthrosis (Relative Risk: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.554–0.974, P = 0.037), which was higher in the allograft/autograft cohort. Conclusion: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that all-cause surgical complications are similar in patients undergoing ACDFs with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autographs. However, the rate of pseudarthrosis appears to be higher in patients with allograft/autographs. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]