Search

This study investigated the cosmetic degradation and toxicity for an accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) prescription delivered in 5 fractions over 1 week and compared the outcomes with those of whole breast irradiation (WBI). The trial was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 prospective cohort study. Eligible women 50 years of age or older with estrogen receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive ductal carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery received 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions of APBI. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of 2-year cosmesis using the RAPID trial's WBI arm as the control arm. A global consensus cosmetic score using a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer rating scale score of excellent, good, fair, or poor for each patient at baseline and 2 years was generated by a panel of 5 radiation oncologists using photographs of treated and untreated breasts. From 2016 to 2019, 298 eligible women were enrolled. By the 2-year follow-up, 76 patients had been lost or withdrawn and 3 had died, resulting in 219 patients available for complete, 2-year photographic cosmetic evaluation. The median follow-up for all participants was 4.7 years (IQR, 3.8-5.5 years). No patient had a fair or poor cosmetic score at the 2-year evaluation. Cosmesis was better or unchanged for 97% of patients and worse for 3% (excellent to good), and no cosmetic failures occurred. The confidence intervals were 0.88 (0.86-0.90) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00) for the RAPID and ACCEL trials, respectively. Cosmetic degradation with 5 daily treatments of the ACCEL trial's APBI intervention is noninferior to the WBI arm of the RAPID trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate a knowledge‐based (KB) planning model for RapidPlan, generated using a five‐field intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) class solution beam strategy and rigorous dosimetric constraints for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Materials and methods: The RapidPlan model was configured using 64 APBI treatment plans and validated for 120 APBI patients who were not included in the training dataset. KB plan dosimetry was compared to clinical plan dosimetry, the clinical planning constraints, and the constraints used in phase III APBI trials. Dosimetric differences between clinical and KB plans were evaluated using paired two‐tailed Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results: KB planning was able to produce IMRT‐based APBI plans in a single optimization without manual intervention that are comparable or better than the conventionally optimized, clinical plans. Comparing KB plans to clinical plans, differences in PTV, heart, contralateral breast, and ipsilateral lung dose–volume metrics were not clinically significant. The ipsilateral breast volume receiving at least 50% of the prescription dose was statistically and clinically significantly lower in the KB plans. Conclusion: KB planning for IMRT‐based APBI provides equivalent or better dosimetry compared to conventional inverse planning. This model may be reliably applied in clinical practice and could be used to transfer planning expertise to ensure consistency in APBI plan quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To report the achieved dosimetry in the ACCEL trial and compare the results to reported dosimetry from the major accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) phase III trials. The ACCEL trial was a single arm, phase II, prospective cohort study. A five-field, inverse-planned, IMRT strategy was employed using a class solution technique to increase planning consistency including high dose conformity and low normal tissue dose to the ipsilateral breast. Between 2016 and 2019, 283 patients were treated with 27 Gy in five fractions in consecutive days. The average PTV conformity index was 1.1. For the ipsilateral breast, the median (range) volume receiving 95% and 50% of the prescription dose was 9.7% (3.2–22.4) and 30.3% (11.1–54.6), respectively. Compared to major APBI phase III trial constraints, this reduction in irradiated volume at the 95% and 50% isodose levels represents a reduction of 209 cm3 and 265 cm3, respectively. The IMRT planning strategy employed in the ACCEL trial demonstrated consistent and superior dosimetry by comparison to conventionally used 3D CRT techniques. Future APBI trials should update dosimetric constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]