Search

Objective/background The impact of post-operative complications in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery is substantial, and increases with age and concomitant co-morbidities. This systematic review focuses on the possible effects of pre-operative exercise therapy (PET) in patients with AAA on post-operative complications, aerobic capacity, physical fitness, and recovery. Methods A systematic search on PET prior to AAA surgery was conducted. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The agreement between the reviewers was assessed with Cohen's kappa. Results Five studies were included, with a methodological quality ranging from moderate to good. Cohen's kappa was 0.79. Three studies focused on patients with an AAA (without indication for surgical repair) with physical fitness as the outcome measure. One study focused on PET in patients awaiting AAA surgery and one study focused on the effects of PET on post-operative complications, length of stay, and recovery. Conclusion PET has beneficial effects on various physical fitness variables of patients with an AAA. Whether this leads to less complications or faster recovery remains unclear. In view of the large impact of post-operative complications, it is valuable to explore the possible benefits of a PET program in AAA surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The reported mortality reduction of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) compared with open repair in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), as observed in observational studies, might be flawed by selection bias based on anatomical suitability for eEVAR. In the present study, we compared mortality in EVAR suitable versus non-EVAR-suitable patients with a ruptured AAA who were all treated with conventional open repair. Materials and Methods: In all patients presenting with a suspected rAAA, computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning was performed. All consecutive patients with a confirmed rAAA on preoperative CTA scan and treated with open repair between April 2002 and April 2008 were included. Anatomical suitability for eEVAR was determined by two blinded independent reviewers. Outcomes evaluated were mortality (intra-operative, 30-day, and 6-month), morbidity, complications requiring re-intervention and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 107 consecutive patients presented with a rAAA and underwent preoperative CTA scanning. In 25 patients, eEVAR was performed. In the 82 patients who underwent open repair, CTA showed an EVAR-suitable rAAA in 33 patients (41.8%) and a non-EVAR-suitable rAAA in 49 patients. Thirty-day and 6-month mortality rate was 15/33 (45.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 28.1–63.7) and 18/33 (54.5%; 95% CI 36.4–71.9) in the EVAR-suitable group versus 24/49 (49.0%; 95% CI 34.4–63.7) (P =0.75) and 29/49 (59.2%; 95% CI 44.2–73.0) (P =0.68) in the non-EVAR-suitable group, respectively. Conclusions: The present study suggests that anatomical suitability for EVAR is not associated with lower early and midterm mortality in patients treated with open ruptured AAA repair. Therefore, the reported reduction in mortality between eEVAR and open repair is unlikely due to selection bias based on anatomical AAA configuration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: Local anatomy and the patient''s risk profile independently affect the expansion rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. We describe a hybrid method that combines finite element modelling and statistical methods to predict patient-specific aneurysm expansion. Methods: The 3-D geometry of the aneurysm was imaged with computed tomography. We used finite element methods to calculate wall stress and aneurysm expansion. Expansion rate was adjusted by risk factors obtained from a database of 80 patients. Aneurysm diameters predicted with and without the risk profiles were compared with diameters measured with ultrasound for 11 patients. Results: For this specific group of patients, local anatomy contributed 62% and the risk profile 38% to the aneurysmal expansion rate. Predictions with risk profiles resulted in smaller root mean square errors than predictions without risk profiles (2.9 vs. 4.0 mm, p < 0.01). Conclusions: This hybrid approach predicted aneurysmal expansion for a period of 30 months with high accuracy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: To unravel the extent to which gender plays a role in the epidemiology, aetiology, risk of rupture and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to give an overview of these factors. Design, Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed in the Medline database and Cochrane Library for gender-specific articles on epidemiology, aetiology, risk of rupture and treatment of AAAs. Results: Our literature review suggests that the prevalence of AAA in women is underestimated. Regarding aetiology, an oestrogen-mediated reduction in macrophage MMP-9 production seems to be an important mechanism causing gender-related differences in AAA development. We found consensus in the literature that women run a greater risk of rupture compared to men under the current management rules for AAAs. Their treatment mortality also seems to be higher for both elective and ruptured repair. Conclusions: Gender-specific guidelines should be put into place for the management of AAAs and awareness for this disease should be increased, both in women themselves and in their doctors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]