Search

Regulation of proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle is crucial for the physiology of germ cells. Their malfunction contributes to infertility and germ cell tumours. The kinesin KIF18A is an important regulator of those processes in animal germ cells. Post-transcriptional regulation of KIF18A has not been extensivelyexplored.Owing to the presence of PUM-binding elements (PBEs), KIF18A mRNA is a potential target of PUM proteins, where PUM refers to Pumilio proteins, RNAbinding proteins that act in post-transcriptional gene regulation. We conducted RNA co-immunoprecipitation combined with RT-qPCR, as well as luciferase reporter assays, by applying an appropriate luciferase construct encoding wild-type KIF18A 3'-UTR, upon PUM overexpression or knockdown in TCam-2 cells, representing human male germ cells. We found that KIF18A is repressed by PUM1 and PUM2. To study how this regulation influences KIF18A function, an MTS proliferation assay, and apoptosis and cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry, was performed upon KIF18A mRNA siRNA knockdown. KIF18A significantly influences proliferation, apoptosis and the cell cycle, with its effects being opposite to PUM effects. Repression by PUM proteins might represent one of mechanisms influencing KIF18A level in controlling proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in TCam-2 cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: PUM1 and PUM2 are RNA-binding Pumilio proteins controlling the accessibility of hundreds of mRNAs for translation in a variety of human tissues. As a result, PUMs exemplify one of the mechanisms safeguarding the cellular proteome. PUM expression is disturbed in cancer, resulting in dysregulation of their target mRNAs. These targets encode factors responsible for processes usually affected in cancer, such as proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle. This review describes PUM1 and PUM2 ribonucleoprotein networks and highlights the mechanisms underlying the regulatory role of PUM proteins and, most importantly, the emerging impact of PUM dysregulation in cancer. It also emphasizes the importance of upcoming studies on PUM proteins in the context of cancer, as they may provide new therapeutic targets in the future. Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that recognizes the UGUANAUA motif, located mostly in the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the protein cofactors recruited by PUM proteins, target mRNAs are directed towards translation, repression, activation, degradation, or specific localization. Abnormal profiles of PUM expression have been shown in several types of cancer, in some of them being different for PUM1 and PUM2. This review summarizes the dysregulation of PUM1 and PUM2 expression in several cancer tissues. It also describes the regulatory mechanisms behind the activity of PUMs, including cooperation with microRNA and non-coding RNA machineries, as well as the alternative polyadenylation pathway. It also emphasizes the importance of future studies to gain a more complete picture of the role of PUM proteins in different types of cancer. Such studies may result in identification of novel targets for future cancer therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammalian Pumilio (PUM) proteins are sequence-specific, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) with wide-ranging roles. They are involved in germ cell development, which has functional implications in development and fertility. Although human PUM1 and PUM2 are closely related to each other and recognize the same RNA binding motif, there is some evidence for functional diversity. To address that problem, first we used RIP-Seq and RNA-Seq approaches, and identified mRNA pools regulated by PUM1 and PUM2 proteins in the TCam-2 cell line, a human male germ cell model. Second, applying global mass spectrometry-based profiling, we identified distinct PUM1- and PUM2-interacting putative protein cofactors, most of them involved in RNA processing. Third, combinatorial analysis of RIP and RNA-Seq, mass spectrometry, and RNA motif enrichment analysis revealed that PUM1 and PUM2 form partially varied RNP-regulatory networks (RNA regulons), which indicate different roles in human reproduction and testicular tumorigenesis. Altogether, this work proposes that protein paralogues with very similar and evolutionary highly conserved functional domains may play divergent roles in the cell by combining with different sets of protein cofactors. Our findings highlight the versatility of PUM paralogue-based post-transcriptional regulation, offering insight into the mechanisms underlying their diverse biological roles and diseases resulting from their dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]