Search

The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) has been associated with sexual dimorphism, with a lower 2D:4D in males. A large body of research has relied on the 2D:4D as a proxy for prenatal androgen exposure, and includes reports of relationships between 2D:4D and a wide range of human traits. Here, we examine the validity of the 2D:4D proxy by studying the association between 2D:4D and classical Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, a condition characterized by excessive prenatal exposure to androgens during most of the gestational period. To this end, we retrospectively examine 513 serial radiographs of the left hand obtained clinically in 90 youth with classical CAH (45 female) and 70 control youth (31 female). Replicating previous reports, we observe associations of the 2D:4D with sex (lower 2D:4D in males) and age (increase of 2D:4D through development). However, we find no evidence for differences in 2D:4D between CAH and controls (full sample: β = −0.001 (−0.008, 0.006); females: β = −0.004 [−0.015, 0.007]; males: β = 0.001, [−0.008, 0.011]). Although our findings do not rule out a small association between the 2D:4D and CAH, they cast doubt on the usefulness of the 2D:4D as a biomarker for prenatal androgen exposure in behavioral research. • We retrospectively study the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in youth with classical Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) and controls. • We replicated previously reported associations of the 2D:4D with sex (lower 2D:4D in males) and age (increase in 2D:4D throughout development). • The associations between 2D:4D and CAH diagnosis were small and statistically indistinguishable from zero, in the full sample and within sex. • Our findings cast doubt on the reliability of the 2D:4D measure as a biomarker for prenatal androgen exposure in behavioral research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ratio of length between the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D) is commonly used as an indicator of prenatal sex hormone exposure. Several approaches have been used to try to validate the measure, including examining 2D:4D in people with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a suite of conditions characterised by elevated adrenal androgen production secondary to defective steroidogenesis. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis that examines the relationship between these two variables. Twelve articles relating to nine CAH cohorts were identified, and 2D:4D comparisons have been made between cases and controls in eight of these cohorts. Altogether, at least one 2D:4D variable has been compared between n = 251 females with CAH and n = 358 unaffected females, and between n = 108 males with CAH and n = 204 unaffected males. A previous meta-analysis (Hönekopp and Watson, 2010) reported lower right hand (R2D:4D) and left hand (L2D:4D) digit ratios in patients with CAH relative to sex-matched controls. Our meta-analysis showed the same pattern, with medium effect sizes for R2D:4D and small effect sizes for L2D:4D. Differences of small magnitude were also observed for M2D:4D, and no significant effects were observed for D [R-L]. Notably, the only effects that remained statistically significant when stratified by sex were R2D:4D in males and L2D:4D in females, and the average effect size had reduced by 46.70% since the meta-analysis of Hönekopp and Watson (2010). We also found that individual comparisons in this literature were considerably underpowered, and that patterns of sexual dimorphism in 2D:4D were similar in CAH samples as in typically developing populations. Findings are discussed in relation to the prenatal androgen hypothesis as well as alternative explanations. • Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) involves elevated prenatal testosterone. • There is a sex difference in the digit ratio (2D:4D) that may involve prenatal androgen exposure. • Article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of CAH and 2D:4D. • Low (male-typical) 2D:4D is associated with CAH and the effects are small-to-medium in size. • Effect sizes observed here are ~50% smaller than those of an earlier meta-analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]