1. On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’and‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse
- Author
-
Victoria Marsland, Ivan Leudar, and Jiri Nekvapil
- Subjects
Linguistics and Language ,Sociology and Political Science ,Communication ,05 social sciences ,050109 social psychology ,06 humanities and the arts ,Language and Linguistics ,Politics ,060105 history of science, technology & medicine ,Categorization ,Key (cryptography) ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,0601 history and archaeology ,Sociology ,Social science - Abstract
This article concerns the attacks on New York and Washington in September 2001. We use Membership Categorization Analysis to establish how the key figures involved in the conflict represented these events and the participants in them. We analyse public addresses made soon after the attacks by the US President George W. Bush, the British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Osama bin Laden of Al Qaeda. Each speaker distinguished ‘us’ from ‘them’ and formulated this distinction so as to justify past violent actions and to prepare grounds for future ones. Bush and Blair both distinguished ‘us’ from ‘them’ in social, political and moral terms, whereas bin Laden did so in religious terms. The categorizations were not done in isolation from each other, but were instead networked. We discuss the relation between membership categorizations, presentations of happenings and violent actions, prior and subsequent and we extend our concept of a ‘dialogical network’.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF