1. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components
- Author
-
Maria Augustinova, Pierre Chausse, Benjamin A. Parris, Kevin J. Riggs, Ludovic Ferrand, Patrick Perret, Stéphanie Ducrot, Richard J. O’Connor, Norbert Maïonchi-Pino, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive - Clermont Auvergne (LAPSCO), Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire Parole et Langage (LPL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU), University of Hull, Department of Psychology, UK, Bournemouth University [Poole] (BU), Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Centre de Recherches sur les Fonctionnements et Dysfonctionnements Psychologiques (CRFDP), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société (IRIHS), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU), Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société (IRIHS)
- Subjects
Male ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,Developmental change ,050105 experimental psychology ,Conflict, Psychological ,Phenomenon ,Reaction Time ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Humans ,Attention ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Child ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Age differences ,05 social sciences ,Individual development ,Cognition ,Semantics ,Reading ,Stroop Test ,[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology ,Female ,Psychology ,050104 developmental & child psychology ,Cognitive psychology ,Stroop effect - Abstract
Only one previous developmental study of Stroop task performance (Schiller, 1966) has controlled for differences in processing speed that exist both within and between age-groups. Therefore, the question of whether the early developmental change in the magnitude of Stroop interference actually persists after controlling for processing speed needs further investigation; work that is further motivated by the possibility that any remaining differences would be caused by process(es) other than processing speed. Analysis of data from two experiments revealed that, even after controlling for processing speed using z-transformed reaction times, early developmental change persists such that the magnitude of overall Stroop interference is larger in 3rd - and 5th - graders as compared to 1st -graders. This pattern indicates that the magnitude of overall Stroop interference peaks after two or three years of reading practice (Schadler & Thissen, 1981). Furthermore, this peak is shown to be due to distinct components of Stroop interference (resulting from specific conflicts) progressively falling into place. Experiment 2 revealed that the change in the magnitude of Stroop interference specifically results from joint contributions of task, semantic and response conflicts in 3rd - and 5th -graders as compared to a sole contribution of task conflict in 1st -graders. The specific developmental trajectories of different conflicts presented in the present work provide unique evidence for multiple loci of Stroop interference in the processing stream (respectively task, semantic and response conflict) as opposed to a single (i.e., response) locus predicted by historically-favored response competition accounts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF