Search

This study analyses selected Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in delineating how commercialized financing structure relates to financial sustainability given the need to control poverty through financially sustainable MFIs. The study takes from a recent SADC microfinance survey which recommended financial rescue packages for ailing MFIs to proffer financial sustainability. This survey failed to specify the form of financing which supports financial sustainability in addition to the inconclusive and little evidence in this regard. We note that though the financing structure and the level of financial sustainability varies with countries, MFIs are generally financially unsustainable. A robust probit model framework affirms the role of financing structure on financial sustainability. Portfolio at risk, cost efficiency and costs linked to deposit attraction explain financial sustainability. We suggest the availing of more donations, upgrading risk management and improving cost efficiency to induce financial sustainability.

Recent evidence shows that MFI financing continues to evolve with an increased inclination towards commercial financing. Taking stock on MFI financing and refocusing on the relationship between financing options and financial sustainability (FS) is unavoidable. The authors consummated a literature review based on complementing the little evidence on the subject with both theoretical and implied evidence from related studies in unpacking the relationship. Though donations are losing grip as a popular MFI financing option, review of literature recommends smart subsidies to spur FS and counter inefficiency, mis-targetting, dependency and distortions. As much as debt addresses agency problems and endorses FS, it has to be kept within limits to curb liquidation and mission drift. Deposit attraction augments FS and outreach, though MFIs must prepare to foot licensing costs, otherwise, mission drift ensues. Equity, though scarce in microfinance, is cheap and additive to FS. The authors suggest that MFIs should consider commercial funding, whilst keeping a check on the downside of each commercial financing option to augment FS and multiply outreach

The Life Cycle Theory (LCT) has been applied in business in an effort to explain the ‘birth, growth, maturation and death’ processes of firms. However, its application and relevancy in the microfinance field has not been popular. The LCT connotes that, the management of MFIs gains experience through time hence sharpen the business model and MFI financing. This allows MFIs to navigate from being small, inefficient and un-sustainable institutions into large, sustainable and financially sustainable institutions. Financial sustainability is celebrated by institutionalists for enhancing outreach to the poor in a consistent way. This makes financial sustainability a supreme MFI development lag necessary for every MFI. Evidence on whether MFIs develop towards financial sustainability has remained on the low side as research has continued to shy away from addressing this worthy cause. In an effort to explain whether MFIs mature towards financial sustainability, this study employs data from selected Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) MFIs, a deviation from a prior study which considered MFIs from across the world with high disclosure tendencies and asset values. We selected SADC MFIs (small and large) on the pretext that, SADC MFIs are typically financially unsustainable as portrayed by an earlier survey – raising concerns on their ability in serving the persistently poverty stricken region. Getting to know whether the LCT can explain financial sustainability becomes obligatory in designing intervention mechanisms. Panel regression methods adjusted for various robustness checks show that, the LCT cannot fully explain MFI financial sustainability. We note the role of MFI financing structure and efficiency measures in defining financial sustainability. Low cost financing sources (equity) support financial sustainability. Donations limit financial sustainability as they nurture dependency and inefficiency. Regulatory costs linked with deposit collection also constrain financial sustainability. We suggest the usage of low cost internal financing sources if MFIs are to attain FS. In the same realm, MFIs ought to restrain costs, whether they come from the financing side or operational side for financial sustainability to be attained. We note the need to maintain a quality loan portfolio to endorse FS.

This paper probes the link between financing structure and outreach noting the commercialization trend for selected Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) MFIs. Assuming MIX panel data on 60 MFIs, this study tackles outreach depth and breadth – a diversion from an outreach depth-centered study which employed Planet Rating data on 74 Sub-Saharan African MFIs. Robust panel methods show that, both outreach depth and breadth are affected by the same variables, though in a different way. Equity, deposits and ‘new’ MFIs significantly further depth whilst borrowings limit depth. Breadth is constrained by borrowings, equity and ‘new’ MFIs while deposits expand the breadth. We suggest that, permitting MFIs to collect deposits go a long way in spurring outreach depth and breadth.