Search

Background A midwife’s ability to fully support women’s autonomy and self-determination with respect to midwifery care is often challenging. This is particularly true of water immersion for labour and birth. However, the woman’s agency over what happens to her body and that of her unborn baby should be key considerations for maternity care provision. Objectives A three phased mixed-methods study was undertaken to examine how water immersion policies and guidelines are informed. Phase three of this study captured the knowledge and experiences of Australian midwives, their support for water immersion and their experiences of using policies and guidelines to inform and facilitate the practice. Methods Critical, post structural, interpretive interactionism was used to examine more than 300 responses to three open-ended questions included in a survey of 233 midwives. Comment data were analysed to provide further insight, context and meaning to previously reported results. Findings Findings demonstrated a complex, multidimensional interplay of factors that impacted on both the midwife’s ability to offer and the woman’s decision to use water immersion under the themes ‘the reality of the system’, ‘the authoritative ‘others’’ and ‘the pseudo decision-makers’. Multiple scaffolded levels were identified, each influenced by the wider macro-socio-political landscape of Australian midwifery care. Conclusions The insight gained from examining midwives’ views and opinions of water for labour and birth, has aided in contextualising previously reported results. Such insight highlights the importance of qualitative research in challenging the status quo and working towards woman-centred practice and policy.

Background: Fetal movements are a key indicator of fetal health. Research has established significant correlations between altered fetal activity and stillbirth. However, women are generally unaware of this relationship. Providing pregnant women with information about the importance of fetal movements could improve stillbirth rates. However, there are no consistent fetal movements awareness messages globally for pregnant women. Aims: This study aimed to explore the antenatal care experiences of Australian mothers who had recently had a live birth to determine their knowledge of fetal movements, the nature and source of that information. Methods: An online survey method was used for 428 women who had a live birth and received antenatal care in Australia. Women’s knowledge of fetal movements, stillbirth risk, and the sources of this knowledge was explored. Findings: A large proportion of participants (84.6%; n = 362) stated they had been informed by health care professionals of the importance of fetal movements during pregnancy. Open-ended responses indicate that fetal movements messages are often myth based. Awareness that stillbirth occurs was high (95.2%;n = 398), although, 65% (n = 272) were unable to identify the current incidence of stillbirth in Australia. Conclusion: Women who received antenatal care have high-awareness of fetal movements, but the information they received was inconsistent. Participants knew stillbirth occurred but did not generally did not indicate they had obtained that knowledge from health care professionals. We recommend a consistent approach to fetal movements messaging throughout pregnancy which focuses on stillbirth prevention. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Aims: To gather, quality assess, synthesize and interpret the views, feeling, and experiences of women who used water immersion during labour and/or birth. Design: A systematic meta-thematic synthesis and GRADE-CERQual. Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, CINHAL, PsychINFO, AMED, EMBASE (MIDIRS only), LILACS, AJOL. Additional searches were carried out using Ethos (thesis database), cross-referencing against Google Scholar and citation chasing. Searches were carried out in August 2019, updated February 2020. Methods: Studies that met the selection criteria were appraised for quality. Data were extracted from the studies using meta-thematic analytical techniques; coding, descriptive findings, and analytical findings. The descriptive findings were subjected to confidence assessments using GRADE-CERQual. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine key statements of findings were generated – one had high confidence, three moderate, three low and one very low confidence in the findings. The analytical findings generated three main themes: Liberation and Self-Emancipation, Synergy, transcendence and demarcation and Transformative birth and beyond. Overall, women experienced warm water immersion during labour and/or birth positively. Both the water and pool itself, facilitated women's physical and psychological needs during labour and/or birth, including offering effective analgesia. Our findings indicated that birthing pools are versatile tools that provide for a space that women can adapt and influence to best suit their individual needs. Conclusion: Women who used warm water immersion for labour and/or birth describe liberating and transformative experiences of welcoming their babies into the world. They were empowered, liberated, and satisfied. We recommend maternity professionals and services offer water immersion as a standard method of pain relief during labour/birth. Impact: Understanding women's experiences of labour and birth will inform future clinical practice. Midwives are optimally positioned to enhance women's access to water immersion. These findings have implications for education, guideline, and policy development as well as clinical practice. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Refereed/Peer-reviewed Background: The 2011 and 2016 Stillbirth Lancet series made a call to action to identify mechanisms to reduce stillbirth stigma. This research answers that call, investigating the extent and dimensions of stillbirth stigma experienced by an international sample of mothers bereaved by stillbirth. Objective: To determine the prevalence and type as well as explore explanatory variables associated with higher levels of stillbirth stigma with bereaved mothers in high-income countries (Australia, United Kingdom, The United States of America and New Zealand). Method: An international survey of 889 bereaved mothers was conducted utilising the recently developed Still- birth Stigma Scale to explore the extent and types of stigma experienced, as well as the association between stigma and self-esteem (Rosenberg Self- Esteem Scales), perinatal grief (Perinatal Grief Scale), and perceived social sup- port (Perceived Social Support Scale). Demographic information (e.g. age, education, stillbirth history, sexual orientation and mental health) were collected to determine the association between individual demographic factors and stillbirth stigma. Results: Results of the Stillbirth Stigma Scale indicated that a majority (54%) of bereaved mothers experienced stigma. Self-stigma was the predominant type of stigma experienced (80%), followed by perceived devaluation (64.9%). Bereaved mothers also experienced discrimination (29.1%) and issues with disclosing their stillbirth to their community (36.7%). Stillbirth stigma scores were higher in bereaved mothers who had experienced the loss of their first child. High scores were associated with the mother’s mental health status (diagnoses prior to stillbirth, and/or after stillbirth (p < .05)).The other scales used indicated that higher stillbirth stigma scores were also associated with lower self-esteem (r (877) = -.304, p < .001), lower perceived social support (r (871) = -.448, p < .001) and higher levels of grief (r (829) = .609, p < .001) Conclusion: The current research was the first to identify that 54% of bereaved mothers experienced stigma, with self-stigma being the most prominent. Bereaved mothers endured discriminating experiences and had trouble disclosing their stillbirth to others within their community. The first-time mother with a self- reported history of mental illnesses appears to be the most at-risk of higher levels of stigma. Future longitudinal research needs to be conducted to determine the direction of the explanatory variables i.e. mental health, self-esteem and social support and develop interventions, which support the bereaved mother and reduce stillbirth stigma. Relevance: This study is the first to demonstrate the prevalence, extent, type and explanatory variables of stigma reported by bereaved mothers and the association between this and poorer outcomes including increased grief and decreased self-esteem. This study begins a dialogue about prevalence and explanatory variables of stillbirth stigma and its impact, to inform future prevention and support potential stigma reduction programs for community and bereaved mothers.

Background Internationally qualified midwives comprise approximately 13% of the Australian midwifery workforce. Despite their central role in the Australian midwifery system, understanding of their transitional experiences is limited. Aim To explore the transitional experiences of internationally qualified midwives practising in Australia. Method A descriptive qualitative study was undertaken, as the second phase of a larger mixed methods study. In this paper we present in-depth insights from 11 internationally qualified midwives practising in Australia. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between May–August 2018, digitally recorded and then transcribed. Transcriptions were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Findings Participants in this study identified that the different culture of the work environment, differences in midwifery practice, lack of autonomy in their practice and perceived discrimination influenced their transition into Australian midwifery practice. Four themes were identified: ‘Differences in midwifery practice’, ‘Cultural incongruence’, ‘Discrimination’ and ‘Mixed emotions’. Discussion Success during the complex transition process depends on the migrant midwives’ ability to build a sense of belonging, and to develop and adopt strategies that assist in dealing with new workplaces and an unfamiliar workforce. Conclusion A structured transition program prior to commencing practice, as well as an evidence-based workplace mentorship program with a focus on Australian midwifery care and culture, may be effective strategies to facilitate their transition. To promote awareness of multiculturalism within the work environment, this study recommends actively encouraging host staff to further develop perspectives that enable them to create positive relationships with staff from other cultures.

Preparing students for communication in clinical healthcare settings can be challenging, particularly given it may be the first time they have considered how and why they communicate. The challenge is to find an effective process for the development of clinical communication skills in a highly content-driven curriculum. The objective of this study was to empower first-year midwifery students to reflect on their experiences of communication to inform and expand their clinical communication by drawing on two distinct disciplines - midwifery and linguistics. This paper reports on the findings of a study that examined the implementation of innovative, preparatory workshops for first-year midwifery students. Data from quantitative and qualitative surveys were collected pre- and post-workshop, and post-clinical placement, and analysed using linguistic mapping and thematic analysis. Perceptible shifts in self-evaluation of competence were noted post the workshop and clinical placement. Students developed and used metalanguage appropriately to describe and evaluate communication while demonstrating increased awareness of the complexity of professional communication. They were able to find a balance between the vital technical information, and the interpersonal aspects of communication. This impacted positively on their perception of women as partners. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Objective The objective of this study was to explore the views, experiences, perceptions of and access to water immersion for labor and birth in Australia. Design A sequential exploratory mixed methods study commenced in 2016. The first phase involved an online survey. The second phase is due to commence in 2019 and will involve focus groups and interviews. This paper presents a subset of results from phase one that asked women to self-rate the benefits and risks associated with water use on Likert-scales and for those who had a previous birth not involving water, how the two experiences compared. Participants A total of 740 Australian women who had used water immersion for labor and/or birth rated the benefits against 7-point Likert scales and 736 responded to 5-point Likert scales relating to commonly cited concerns surrounding the option. Results Women highly rated water immersion against all benefits. Benefits that were most highly rated (by numbers of ‘entirely agree’ on 7-point Likert scales) included sense of safety (80.14%), an alert baby (75.00%), a positive birth experience (72.70%), water as soothing (72.03%) and freedom of movement (71.35%). Women were most concerned (by selecting ‘somewhat’ to ‘extremely concerned’ on 5-point Likert scales) about being told to get out of the water when they did not want to (n = 120/736, 16.30%), their contractions going away (n = 76/736, 10.33%) and unsupportive staff (n = 65/736, 8.83%). More than 90% (n = 682/740) of women mostly to entirely agreed that they would recommend water immersion to others. Women rated water immersion as more comfortable, more satisfying and more relaxing when compared to previous births that they had that did not involve water. Key conclusions Women value water immersion for labor and birth. They have very little to no concern for the most common adverse events as documented in the literature. Implications for practice The results add to the growing evidence base surrounding water immersion for labor and birth. Whilst there remains ongoing debate about the safety of water immersion, women's experiences should be considered alongside outcome data. The results of this study may assist policy makers and clinicians in their advocacy and support of women who choose water immersion. Ethical considerations The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia approved the research.

Background Water immersion for labour and birth is consistently challenged as a practice lacking support from high quality evidence. Despite this, the option is available to Australian women. Practitioners are guided by policies and guidelines however, given the research paucity, questions surround the way in which water immersion policies and guidelines are informed. Aims The aims of the study were to determine how water immersion policies and/or guidelines are informed and to what extent the policy/guideline facilitates the option of water immersion for labour and birth with respect to women’s choice and autonomy. Methods Phase two of a three phase mixed methods study used critical, post structural interpretive interactionism to examine the process of development and implementation of water immersion policies and guidelines from informant’s experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 Australian participants. Findings Participants highlighted that the lack of randomised controlled trials had resulted in other forms of evidence being drawn upon to inform water immersion policies and guidelines. This was influenced in part by individual interpretations of evidence with medical views taking precedence. This sometimes resulted in policy and guideline documents that were restrictive with this impacting on women’s ability to access the option. Conclusion Perceived limitations of research and the subsequent translation of this perceived paucity of evidence into policies and guidelines, has impacted on women’s ability to exercise choice and autonomy with respect to water immersion and indeed, on the professional autonomy of practitioners who wish to facilitate it.