Search

Vancomycin is often used as antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Vancomycin requires longer infusion times to avoid associated side effects. We hypothesized that vancomycin infusion is often started too late and that delayed infusion may predispose patients to increased rates of surgical site infections and prosthetic joint infections.We reviewed clinical data for all primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients at our institution between 2013 and 2020 who received intravenous vancomycin as primary perioperative gram-positive antibiotic prophylaxis. We calculated duration of infusion before incision or tourniquet inflation, with a cutoff of 30 minutes defining adequate administration. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) appropriate administration and 2) incomplete administration. Surgical factors and quality outcomes were compared between groups.We reviewed 1047 primary THA and TKA patients (524 THAs and 523 TKAs). The indication for intravenous vancomycin usage was allergy (61%), methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization (17%), both allergy and colonization (14%), and other (8%). 50.4% of patients began infusion30 minutes preoperatively (group A), and 49.6% began infusion30 minutes preoperatively (group B). Group B had significantly higher rates of readmissions for infectious causes (3.6 vs 1.3%, P = .017). This included a statistically significant increase in confirmed prosthetic joint infections (2.2% vs 0.6%, P = .023). Regression analysis confirmed30 minutes of vancomycin infusion as an independent risk factor for PJI when controlling for comorbidities (OR 5.22, P = .012).Late infusion of vancomycin is common and associated with increased rates of infectious causes for readmission and PJI. Preoperative protocols should be created to ensure appropriate vancomycin administration when indicated.

Background Medicare’s Bundled Payments for Care Initiative (BPCI) is a risk-sharing alternative payment model. There is a concern that BPCI providers may avoid operating on obese patients and active smokers to reduce costs. We sought to understand if increased focus on these patient factors has led to a change in patient demographics in Medicare-insured patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent TKA at an academic orthopedic specialty hospital between 1/1/13 and 8/31/19. Surgical date, insurance provider, BMI, and smoking status were collected. Patients were categorized as a current, former, or never smoker. Patients were categorized as obese if their BMI was >30 kg/m2, morbidly obese if their BMI was >40 kg/m2, and super obese if their BMI was >50 kg/m2. Results In total, 10,979 patients with complete insurance information were analyzed. There was no statistically significant change in the proportion of Medicare patients who were active smokers (4.34% in 2013, 4.85% in 2019, Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.6092, P = .146). The proportion of Medicare patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 increased over the study period (35.84% in 2013, 55.77% in 2019, Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.8505, P = .015). When looking at patients with BMI >40 kg/m2 and >50 kg/m2, there was no significant change. Conclusions Despite concern that reimbursement payments could alter access to care for patients with certain risk factors, this study did not find a noticeable difference in the representation of patients with obesity and smoking status undergoing TKA following the installation of BPCI. Level of Evidence III, retrospective observational analysis.

Background The second and third metacarpals are firmly attached, immobile structures which for the stable pillar of the hand. The trapezoid has been described as the keystone of the wrist, allowing a wide range of functional motion as well as inherent anatomic and biomechanical stability to the carpus. Case Description We describe a novel boxing injury with a 180-degree in situ dislocation of the right trapezoid with concomitant second and third carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocations. Open anatomic reduction of the trapezoid was obtained, and subsequent percutaneous pinning of the metacarpals allowed for a full functional recovery and return to sports at 6 months. Literature Review Combined trapezoid and CMC dislocations are extremely rare and have only been previously described in high-energy mechanism injuries, involving a direct dorsal force such as from the steering wheel in a motor vehicle collision. There are no previous reports of this injury occurring in the setting of direct axial load along the metacarpals in a clenched fist such as in a punch or fighting injury. Clinical Relevance The rare nature of this combined injury, its novel mechanism, and the difficulty in interpreting acute injury and postreduction radiographs require that the treating physician have a high degree of clinical suspicion for associated injuries when CMC dislocations are identified. Treatment strategies incorporating intraoperative fluoroscopy, open anatomic reduction of the trapezoid under direct visualization along with closed reduction, and pinning of the metacarpals reestablish carpal stability and provide excellent long-term results.

Background There are no studies to date analyzing the effect of spinal malalignment on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Knee flexion is a well-described lower extremity compensatory mechanism for maintaining sagittal balance with increasing spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a subset of patients with poor range of motion (ROM) after TKA have unrecognized spinal deformity, predisposing them to knee flexion contractures and stiffness. Methods We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of patients who underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for poor ROM after TKA. Using standing full-length biplanar images, knee alignment and spinopelvic parameters were measured. Patients were stratified by pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis as a measure of spinal sagittal alignment with a mismatch of ≥10° defined as abnormal, and we calculated the incidence of sagittal spinal deformity. Results Average ROM before MUA was extension 3° and flexion 83°. About 62% of patients had a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch of ≥10°. In the spinal deformity group, post-MUA ROM was improved for flexion only, whereas both flexion and extension were improved in the nondeformity group. Conclusion Compensatory knee flexion because of sagittal spinal deformity may predispose to poor ROM after TKA. Patients with clinical suspicion should be worked up preoperatively and counseled accordingly.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and isolated trochanteric descent seek to prevent abductor weakness in patients with a hip deformity because of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; however, no studies have evaluated radiographic findings or abductor strength in children treated with these procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do children with Waldenström Stage III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease treated with either isolated greater trochanteric descent or isolated greater trochanteric apophyseodesis achieve improved radiographic findings (Stulberg classification or neck-shaft angle) compared with those who underwent no surgical treatment? (2) Do children treated with one of those procedures achieve greater abductor strength than those who did not have surgery? METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, we treated 89 children with Waldenström Type III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (reossification). Of these, 27.9% (12 patients) underwent greater trochanteric descent, 25.6% (11 patients) underwent greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and 46.5% (20 patients) did not have surgery. During that time, the decision to perform either apophyseodesis or trochanteric descent was made by the surgeon based on the subjective appearance of remaining growth from the greater trochanter. Nonsurgical management was chosen by the parents of the patients after the risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. During greater trochanteric descent, the greater trochanter was osteotomized and fixed distally with two 7.0-mm screws. During greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, the physis was identified fluoroscopically, and the lateral half of the growth plate was drilled. Nonoperative treatment involved serial clinical and radiographic evaluations every 3 to 6 months. All children in all groups were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 years. The median follow-up durations for children undergoing greater trochanteric descent, greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and control cohorts were 6.6 years (range 6.0-8.2 years), 6.5 years (range 6.1-9.2 years), and 7.4 years (range 6.0-9.1 years), respectively. On presentation, each patient’s affected hip was classified according to the Stulberg classification by the operating surgeon and an orthopaedic surgeon not involved in the child’s care. The neck-shaft angle was measured for each patient before surgery and at the final follow-up examination. Abductor strength was assessed by a pediatric orthopaedic fellow and a physical therapist with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Each patient was given a muscle strength score on a scale of 0 to 10 points, per a modification of the Medical Research Council scale to allow for a narrower range. We had 80% power to detect an 8° difference in the neck-shaft angle between the greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and nonoperative management cohorts. A sample size of 6.8 patients per cohort would be necessary to detect the above endpoint. RESULTS: With the numbers available, we found no differences among the groups in the proportion of patients with Stulberg Class 2 femoral heads (two of 12 patients in the isolated trochanteric descent group, three of 11 in the isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis group, and two of 20 who did not undergo surgery; p = 0.46). Likewise, there were no differences among the three groups in terms of the neck-shaft angle at a minimum of 6 years of follow-up (122° ± 6°, 119° ± 7°, and 126° ± 8° in the isolated trochanteric descent, isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis, and nonoperative groups, respectively). There were no differences among the groups in term of the median abductor strength test result: seven of 10 (range 6-8), six of 10 (range 6-8), and six of 10 (range 6-10; p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Because neither isolated greater trochanteric descent nor greater trochanteric apophyseodesis alone had an effect on hip morphology or abductor strength in children with sequellae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, we conclude these types of extraarticular surgery are ineffective. Therefore, we no longer perform isolated trochanteric descent or apophyseodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

INTRODUCTION Plain radiographs of the shoulder are routinely obtained for patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain. The diagnostic utility of these radiographs is debatable. METHODS Patients presenting for the first time to a shoulder clinic with atraumatic shoulder pain received a plain radiographic series. After considering their medical history and physical examination, we made a preliminary diagnosis and formulated a tentative treatment plan. We then reviewed the radiographs and determined whether the addition of these radiographs altered the diagnosis and/or treatment. RESULTS A total of 343 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age >50 years (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.8; P < 0.00001) and weakness in forward elevation (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.4; P = 0.0003) were associated with the presence of radiographic findings. Plain radiographs altered the proposed diagnosis in only 14.9% (51/343) of cases. However, clinical management was changed in only 1.7% of cases. Plain radiographs had no effect on clinical management in 97.4% of patients younger than 50 years. DISCUSSION Plain radiographs rarely alter the diagnosis or affect management in the setting of atraumatic shoulder pain, particularly in patients younger than 50 years. Patients may be exposed to unnecessary radiation, and the healthcare system as a whole may be burdened with the increased cost of this imaging modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II (diagnostic).