Search

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a prototype, ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography offering higher reconstruction matrix (1024 x 1024) and spatial resolution (0.15 mm) for chest imaging. METHODS: Higher (1024) matrix reconstruction enabled by ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography scanner (128-detector rows; detector width, 0.25 mm; spatial resolution, 0.15 mm) was compared with conventional (512) reconstruction with image quality grading on a Likert scale (1, excellent; 5, nondiagnostic) for image noise, artifacts, contrast, small detail, lesion conspicuity, image sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. Image noise and signal-to-noise ratio were quantified. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was achieved for all scans on 101 patients. The 1024 reconstruction demonstrated increased image noise (20.2 +/- 4.0 vs 17.2 +/- 3.8, P < 0.001) and a worse noise rating (1.98 +/- 0.63 vs 1.75 +/- 0.61, P < 0.001) but performed significantly better than conventional 512 matrix with fewer artifacts (1.37 +/- 0.43 vs 1.50 +/- 0.48, P < 0.001), better contrast (1.50 +/- 0.56 vs 1.62 +/- 0.57, P < 0.001), small detail detection (1.06 +/- 0.19 vs 2.02 +/- 0.22, P < 0.001), lesion conspicuity (1.08 +/- 0.23 vs 2.02 +/- 0.24, P < 0.001), sharpness (1.09 +/- 0.24 vs 2.02 +/- 0.28, P < 0.001), and overall diagnostic confidence (1.09 +/- 0.25 vs 1.18 +/- 0.34, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography enabled a higher reconstruction matrix and improved image quality compared with conventional matrix reconstruction, with a minor increase in noise.

To investigate the performance of a reconstruction algorithm, single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR), against standard reconstruction in cardiac computed tomography (CT) studies of patients with implanted metal and in a defibrillator lead phantom.From a retrospective, cross-sectional clinical study with institutional review board approval of 118 patients with implanted metal, 122 cardiac CT studies from November 2009 to August 2016 performed on a 320-detector row scanner with standard and SEMAR reconstructions were included. The maximum beam hardening artifact radius, artifact attenuation variation surrounding the implanted metal, and image quality on a 4-point scale (1-no/minimal artifact to 4-severe artifact) were assessed for each reconstruction. A defibrillator lead phantom study was performed at different tube potentials and currents with both reconstruction methods. Maximum beam hardening artifact radius and average artifact attenuation variation were measured.In the clinical study, SEMAR markedly reduced the maximum beam hardening artifact radius by 77% (standard: 14.8 mm [IQR 9.7-22.2] vs. SEMAR: 3.4 mm [IQR 2.2-7.1], p 0.0001) and artifact attenuation variation by 51% (standard: 130.0 HU [IQR 75.9-184.4] vs. SEMAR: 64.3 HU [IQR 48.2-89.2], p 0.0001). Image quality improved with SEMAR (standard: 3 [IQR 2-3.5] vs. SEMAR: 2 [IQR 1-2.5], p 0.0001). The defibrillator lead phantom study confirmed these results across varying tube potentials and currents.SEMAR reconstruction achieved superior image quality and markedly reduced maximum beam hardening artifact radius and artifact attenuation variation compared to standard reconstruction in 122 clinical cardiac CT studies of patients with implanted metal and in a defibrillator lead phantom study.

Assessing coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a valuable tool for individualizing cardiac risk assessment. In CAC scanning, this technical report assesses the use of a true model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction (“FIRST”) and assess whether FIRST allows for reduced radiation dose CAC scanning on 320-detector row computed tomography (320-CT). Here, 100 consecutive patients prospectively underwent reduced and standard dose scans. For the patients (59 ± 9 years, 61% male) stratified by Agatston categories 0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400,> 400, agreement between reduced dose with FIRST versus standard dose with FBP was excellent at 81% (95% CI: 73–88%) with kappa 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64–0.85). Median radiation exposure was 75% lower for reduced (0.35 mSv) versus standard dose (1.37 mSv) scans. In conclusion, agreement was excellent for reduced dose with FIRST and standard dose with FBP in 320-detector row CT CAC imaging in well-established categories of cardiovascular risk. These methods make it possible to reduce radiation exposure by 75%.