Search

Use of intraprocedural observation and pharmacologic challenges have been proposed as means to differentiate permanent pulmonary vein (PV)-left atrial conduction block from inadequate ablation lesions.The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical impact of spontaneous and adenosine-provoked reconnection using contemporary atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation technologies.The CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs. Standard Exposure Duration) study enrolled 346 patients with paroxysmal AF and randomized them to contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation (CF-RF) or cryoballoon ablation. Patients underwent provocative testing with adenosine after a 20-minute observation period. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for arrhythmia monitoring.Spontaneous reconnection was observed in 5.4% of PVs (71/1318) during the 20-minute postprocedure observation period, and dormant conduction was elicited in 5.7% of PVs (75/1318). Both spontaneous reconnection and dormant conduction were more common after CF-RF compared to cryoballoon ablation (P = .03 and P.0001, respectively). Acute PV reconnection (spontaneous or adenosine-provoked) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia in the cryoballoon group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.96; P = .0007) but not in the CF-RF group (HR 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.58; P = .16). In the absence of acute reconnection, the freedom from recurrent arrhythmia did not differ between groups (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.6057-1.495; P = .83).Patients without spontaneous or adenosine-provoked reconnection had better outcomes compared to those with acute PV reconnection, suggesting that efforts should be directed toward ensuring an ideal ablation lesion at the first attempt in order to achieve durable PV isolation.

The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration (CIRCA-DOSE) study was a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded trial that compared contact-force radiofrequency ablation and two different regimens of cryoballoon ablation. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for the purpose of continuous rhythm monitoring, with all arrhythmia events undergoing independent adjudication by a committee blinded to treatment allocation. The study demonstrated there were no significant differences between contact-force radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia, symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia, asymptomatic AF, symptomatic AF or AF burden. While the results of the CIRCA-DOSE study are reviewed here, this article focuses on considerations around the design of the study and places the observed outcomes in context.

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and has been associated with an increased risk of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of patients experiencing ERAT after PVI using advanced-generation ablation technologies.This is a prespecified substudy of the CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double-Short vs Standard Exposure Duration) trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing PVI with contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation to secondary-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF. All study patients received an implantable cardiac monitor to allow continuous rhythm monitoring. ERAT was defined as any recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia within the first 90 days after AF ablation.ERAT occurred in 61% of the 346 patients at a median of 12 days (range 1-90 days) after ablation. ERAF was a significant predictor of late recurrence (60.1% with ER vs 25.9% without ER; P.001) and symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (31.6% with ERAF vs 6.7% without ERAF; P.001). Receiver operating curve analyses revealed a strong correlation between ERAT timing and burden and late recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified ER timing (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-5.95; P = .004) and burden (HR 1.05 per 1% ER burden; 95% CI 1.04-1.07; P.001) as strong independent predictors of late recurrence. Incidence rate, timing, burden, and prognostic significance of ER did not differ between the study groups.ERAT remains common after PVI despite use of advanced-generation ablation technologies. Early AF recurrence beyond 3 weeks after ablation is associated with increased risk of late recurrence.