1. Factors associated with psychological distress amongst outpatient chemotherapy patients: An analysis of depression, anxiety and stress using the DASS-21
- Author
-
Michelle McMullen, Angus Cook, Arman Hasani, Peter Lau, Joseph McTigue, Marion Bamblett, Claire Johnson, and Scott Taylor
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Referral ,Population ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Anxiety ,Lower risk ,Tertiary Care Centers ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Neoplasms ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Outpatients ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,General Nursing ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Depressive Disorder ,education.field_of_study ,Performance status ,DASS ,business.industry ,Western Australia ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Comorbidity ,Distress ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Emergency medicine ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Stress, Psychological - Abstract
Aim This study sought to identify clinical, demographic and service-related factors associated with psychological distress amongst outpatient chemotherapy patients. Background Distress in cancer patients leads to increased risk of psychological comorbidity, contributing to sub-optimal treatment adherence and potentially leading to poorer health outcomes. Screening and recognition of distress and risk factors is an important aspect of holistic care within a multidisciplinary team environment. Methods Data were obtained via survey and chart review of ambulatory chemotherapy patients at three public tertiary referral hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. The DASS-21 was used to screen for psychological distress. Regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between distress and a range of cancer, socioeconomic and treatment factors. Results Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Score ≤ 80 ( OR 3.8, 95% CI [1.7, 78.7]) and average waiting time (between oncology outpatient appointment and commencement of chemotherapy infusion) > 60 min ( OR 2.4, 95% CI [1.04, 5.5]) were at increased risk of moderate-severe distress. Patients with a household income between $AU 50–75,000 p.a. had a lower risk of distress compared to OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.01, 0.52]). On sub-scale analysis, depression and anxiety contributed more to overall distress than the stress subscales. Conclusions Performance status, waiting times and household income were key predictors of distress. Findings could assist clinicians to identify higher-risk population subsets that could benefit from targeted screening and additional psychological and social work support. Findings could also assist administrators to consider the contribution of modifiable factors such as waiting times to patient distress.
- Published
- 2018