Search

PURPOSE We evaluated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detecting tumor burden in melanoma and examined whether early changes in the number of ctDNA copies predict response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 12 patients with stage III and 50 patients with stage IV melanoma with BRAF exon 15 or NRAS exon 3 mutations in tumor tissue. We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to retrospectively analyze serial plasma samples for mutation-positive ctDNA. RESULTS Matched plasma and serum samples were positive for ctDNA, lactate dehydrogenase, and S100 in 113 (45.8%), 108 (43.7%; not significant), and 58 (23.5%; P < .0001) of 247 samples from 50 patients with stage IV melanoma, and in 17 (63%), eight (29.6%; P = .014), and five (18.5%; P < .0001) of 27 samples from 12 patients with stage III melanoma. The number of mutant ctDNA copies correlated with concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase ( r = 0.50) and S100 ( r = 0.64), tumor volume ( r2 = 0.58), and tumor metabolic activity ( r2 = 0.83). Within 30 days before surgery, initiation of treatment, or change in treatment, ctDNA, LDH, and S100 were positive in 76.8%, 53.6% ( P = .01), and 46.4% ( P < .001) of patients, respectively. In patients with stage III or IV melanoma, early changes in ctDNA within 1 month after initiation of treatment correctly predicted RECIST response categories in 19 of 20 patients. Detectable ctDNA within 30 days after surgery or initiation of systemic treatment predicted inferior progression-free survival in patients with stage III disease ( P = .018). In patients with stage IV disease, 10 or more copies of ctDNA per mL at first follow-up indicated shorter progression-free survival (3.8 v 9 months; hazard ratio, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.56 to 10.53). CONCLUSION ctDNA indicated active tumor and was an adverse prognostic marker for tumor progression. Dynamic changes in ctDNA allowed prediction of response early after initiation of treatment. These data support the use of ctDNA to guide treatment in melanoma.

This prospective trial aimed to investigate whether tumor-specific cKIT and PDGFRA mutations can be detected and quantified in circulating tumor (ct)DNA in patients with active GIST, and whether detection indicates disease activity. We included 25 patients with active disease and cKIT or PDGFRA mutations detected in tissue. Mutant ctDNA was detected in the peripheral blood plasma using allele-specific ligation (L-)PCR and droplet digital (d)PCR. CtDNA harboring tumor-specific cKIT or PDGFRA mutations was detected at least once in 16 out of 25 patients using L-PCR (64%) and in 20 out of 25 patients with dPCR (80%). Using dPCR, the absolute numbers of ctDNA fragments (DNA copies/ml) and the mutant allele frequency (MAF; in percent of wild-type control) strongly correlated with tumor size expressed as RECIST1.1 sum of diameter (SOD) in mm (ρ = 0.3719 and 0.408, respectively, p < 0.0001) and response status (ρ = 0.3939 and 0.392, respectively, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001). Specificity of dPCR for detection of progression was 79.2% with a sensitivity of 55.2% and dPCR discriminated CR from active disease with a specificity of 96% and s sensitivity of 44.7%. With L-PCR, correlations of MAF with tumor size and response status were less prominent. Serial ctDNA measurement reflected individual disease courses over time. Targeted panel sequencing of four patients detected additional driver mutations in all cases and secondary resistance mutations in two cases. Thus, ctDNA indicates disease activity in patients with GIST and should be incorporated as companion biomarker in future prospective trials.

Background Novel biomarkers and molecular monitoring tools hold potential to improve outcome for patients following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that the combined longitudinal analysis of mutated cell-free plasma KRAS (cfKRASmut) and CA 19–9 during adjuvant treatment and follow-up might more accurately predict disease course than hitherto available parameters. Methods Between 07/2015 and 10/2018, we collected 134 plasma samples from 25 patients after R0/R1-resection of PDAC during adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment surveillance at our institution. Highly sensitive discriminatory multi-target ddPCR assays were employed to screen plasma samples for cfKRASmut. cfKRASmut and CA 19–9 dynamics were correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were followed-up until 01/2020. Results Out of 25 enrolled patients, 76% had undergone R0 resection and 48% of resected PDACs were pN0. 17/25 (68%) of patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 22.0 months, with 19 out of 25 (76%) patients relapsing during study period. Median RFS was 10.0 months, median OS was 22.0 months. Out of clinicopathologic variables, only postoperative CA 19–9 levels and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with survival endpoints. cfKRASmut. was detected in 12/25 (48%) of patients, and detection of high levels inversely correlated with survival endpoint. Integration of cfKRASmut and CA 19–9 levels outperformed either individual marker. cfKRASmut outperformed CA 19–9 as dynamic marker since increase during adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up was highly predictive of early relapse and poor OS. Conclusions Integrated analysis of cfKRASmut and CA 19–9 levels is a promising approach for molecular monitoring of patients following resection of PDAC. Larger prospective studies are needed to further develop this approach and dissect each marker’s specific potential.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood plasma of cancer patients is an emerging biomarker used across oncology, facilitating noninvasive disease monitoring and genetic profiling at various disease milestones. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technologies have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for robust ctDNA detection at relatively low costs. Yet, their value for ctDNA-based management of a broad population of cancer patients beyond clinical trials remains elusive. Methods: We developed mutation-specific ddPCR assays that were optimized for their use in real-world cancer management, covering 12 genetic aberrations in common cancer genes, such as EGFR, BRAF, KIT, KRAS, and NRAS. We assessed the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of blank (LOB) for each assay and validated their performance for ctDNA detection using matched tumor sequencing. Results: We applied our custom ddPCR assays to 352 plasma samples from 96 patients with solid tumors. Mutation detection in plasma was highly concordant with tumor sequencing, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity across all assays. In 20 cases, radiographic cancer progression was mirrored by an increase of ctDNA concentrations or the occurrence of novel mutations in plasma. Moreover, ctDNA profiling at diagnosis and during disease progression reflected personalized treatment selection through the identification of actionable gene targets in 20 cases. Conclusion: Collectively, our work highlights the potential of ctDNA assessment by sensitive ddPCR for accurate disease monitoring, robust identification of resistance mutations, and upfront treatment selection in patients with solid tumors. We envision an increasing future role for ctDNA profiling within personalized cancer management in daily clinical routine.

9564 Background: Available biomarkers LDH and S100B possess limited sensitivity and specificity to predict outcome in melanoma. In this pilot study we evaluated the use of circulating tumor (ct)DNA harboring BRAF and NRAS mutations as a predictive biomarker for treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Methods: We analyzed 89 retrospective plasma samples from 32 unselected pts, and 158 samples from 12 pts included in a prospective trial (DRKS00009507). We included stage III disease with planned resection or stage IV disease before initiation or change of medical treatment. Blood samples were taken at baseline at d +8, d +28, and thereafter at 3 months intervals for up to two years. We developed a hydrolysis probe based, Locked Nucleic Acid assay to detect BRAF V600E and wild type ctDNA by droplet digital PCR. Results were correlated with LDH, S100B and PFS. Results: Sensitivity of BRAF V600E specific assay was 0.01% with a limit of Blank of 0.28 copies/well. Of 31 stage IV pts with retrospective samples, 23 were positive for BRAF V600E ctDNA at least once (74%). Positive pts had a mean of 9 (range: 1-17) and 483 (range: 0.1-16,388) BRAF V600E copies/mL for stage III and stage IV respectively. The presence of ctDNA at baseline predicted poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.487, 95% CI 0.34-6.45). A negative slope in BRAF V600E ctDNA was a favorable prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.230, 95% CI 0.04-1.20) with a median PFS of 3.42 vs. 2.56 months (Range 1.87-8.9 vs. 0.89-5.02). Residual ctDNA at the first time point after initiation or change of treatment was related to a shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 95% CI 0.39-10.53). Based on 144 measurement pairs, BRAF ctDNA strongly correlated with S100 (r = 0.73) and LDH (r = 0.52). Conclusions: Residual ctDNA early after change or institution of treatment predicted tumor progression at first clinical response assessment. A positive to negative conversion or a decrease indicated a more favorable course. These data support the use of ctDNA as an early predictive marker for treatment response. We will examine whether two or more detected mutations indicate clonal heterogeneity and confer adverse prognosis. Clinical trial information: DRKS00009507.