Search

Differentiation between multiple primary lung cancers and pulmonary metastases (PM) has important implications in staging, prognosis, and treatment strategies. Clinical and immunohistopathologic criteria have been standardized; however, a substantial number of cases remain difficult to classify. Using next-generation sequencing, it is now possible to improve the classification of multiple lung cancer lesions. This study systematically investigated the value of routine morphologic and IHC characteristics, p53 protein expression, TP53 mutation analysis, and 50-gene panel sequencing (GPS) in 111 lesions from 50 patients with multiple lung lesions. Based on immunohistopathologic criteria, 32 paired lesions were classified as multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) and 21 as PM. TP53 mutation analysis indicated MPLC in 23 and PM in 6 pairs, but in the majority of cases (n = 28, 49%) no mutation was observed and no conclusion could be drawn. In contrast, only 2 pairs were not conclusive using GPS. In a significant number of matching tumor samples (n = 19, 39%), sequencing results were contradictory to the initial immunohistopathology diagnosis. No separation in overall survival for classifications based on immunohistopathology was observed, while a clear but nonsignificant trend was observed concerning survival in MPLC patients (hazard ratio=3.98) using 50-gene GPS. In about one-third of the patients, GPS provided additional information to improve the differentiation between MPLC and PM.

Contains fulltext : 170989.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) AIMS: Molecular PCR-based clonality analysis is helpful for identification of monoclonal B-cell or T-cell populations and to distinguish malignant lymphoma from reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Typically, clonality assessment on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) requires freshly obtained aspirates, but the collection and processing of these samples are often challenging in daily practice. In this study, we assessed the routine diagnostic value of the EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 assay for B-cell clonality on air-dried archived Giemsa-stained smears. METHODS: This study comprised a retrospective analysis of a consecutive diagnostic cohort of 192 FNAC samples from 184 patients with at least 2-year follow-up. The results from the clonality assay were integrated with cytomorphological assessment and evaluated for their accuracy in detecting malignant disease. EuroClonality expert re-evaluation was performed for all cases with ambiguous results and for cases in which the diagnosis did not match the follow-up data. RESULTS: The clonality assay showed a high accuracy of 93% for detection of malignancy, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 92%. All 64 cases with monoclonal Ig heavy chain (IGH)/Ig kappa chain (IGK) rearrangements were confirmed malignant by histology or clinical follow-up. Expert re-evaluation changed the definite diagnosis for five cases (3%), mainly because of low signals or no proper duplicate results. We discuss and elucidate all cases for which the clonality results did not match the disease follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 assay can successfully be performed on cytological Giemsa-stained smears and inclusion in daily practice can assist in better identification of malignant lymphoma.