Search

Background: Elabela (ELA) is a newly identified endogenous ligand of apelin receptor (APJ) which has been confirmed to be implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Previous experiments have revealed the critical role of ELA in eliciting vasodilation and lowering blood pressure. However, the role of plasma ELA levels in hypertensive patients and its relationship with vascular function have not been investigated.Method: Thirty-one patients with essential hypertension (EH) and 31 age-matched healthy subjects as controls were recruited in the study. Plasma ELA concentration and vascular function parameters including brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were measured.Results: We observed remarkably lower plasma ELA concentration in hypertensive patients as compared with controls (1.29 ± 0.56 ng/ml vs. 1.79 ± 0.55 ng/ml; P = 0.001). Linear correlation analysis showed that ELA was negatively correlated with systolic blood pressure (r = -0.388, P = 0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.321, P = 0.011) and positively correlated with FMD (r = 0.319, P = 0.011). There was no statistically significant relationship between ELA and baPWV (r = 0.234, P = 0.067). Stepwise multiple linear analysis also identified a close association of plasma ELA levels with endothelial function.Conclusion: The present study demonstrates for the first time that circulating ELA levels are reduced in patients with EH. The fall in endogenous ELA levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension-related vascular damage.

Background Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are characterized by a decline in vascular regeneration, which is related to the dysfunction of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). G-protein-coupled receptor 4 (GPR4) is a proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that contributes to neovascularization in acidic microenvironments. However, the role of GPR4 in regulating the angiogenic capacity of EPCs from CAD patients in response to acidity generated in ischemic tissue remains completely unclear. Methods The angiogenic capacity of EPCs collected from CAD patients and healthy subjects was evaluated in different pH environments. The GPR4 function of regulating EPC-mediated angiogenesis was analyzed both in vitro and in vivo. The downstream mechanisms were further investigated by genetic overexpression and inhibition. Results Acidic environment prestimulation significantly enhanced the angiogenic capacity of EPCs from the non-CAD group both in vivo and in vitro, while the same treatment yielded the opposite result in the CAD group. Among the four canonical proton-sensing GPCRs, GPR4 displays the highest expression in EPCs. The expression of GRP4 was markedly lower in EPCs from CAD patients than in EPCs from non-CAD individuals independent of acid stimulation. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of GPR4 with subsequent decreased phosphorylation of STAT3 mimicked the impaired function of EPCs from CAD patients at pH 6.4 but not at pH 7.4. Elevating GPR4 expression restored the neovessel formation mediated by EPCs from CAD patients in an acidic environment by activating STAT3/VEGFA signaling. Moreover, the beneficial impact of GPR4 upregulation on EPC-mediated angiogenic capacity was abrogated by blockade of the STAT3/VEGFA signaling pathway. Conclusions Our present study demonstrated for the first time that loss of GPR4 is responsible for the decline in proton sensing and angiogenic capacity of EPCs from CAD patients. Augmentation of GPR4 expression promotes the neovessel formation of EPCs by activating STAT3/VEGF signaling. This finding implicates GPR4 as a potential therapeutic target for CAD characterized by impaired neovascularization in ischemic tissues.