Search

The use of continuous and long‐term monitoring of respiratory rate is vital for predicting pneumonia in symptomatic patients; however, it is often measured manually and discontinuously by counting of chest wall movements in routine practice.1 Hence, here we developed a point‐of‐care system for the early detection of pneumonia in symptomatic elderly bedridden hospitalized patients on the basis of 24‐hours continuous and noncontact monitoring of respiratory rate using a medical radar sensor. We focused on designing a system that would improve hospitalized patient quality of life and reduce medical staff workload. To this end, we adopted a medical radar sensor for respiration monitoring that featured an extremely low burden on the patient and enabled unobtrusive measurements without the need to attach electrodes to the patient's body.2 To reduce medical staff workload, a prediction method, that is, return map,3 was implemented into the system to analyze the time series respiratory rates, thereby extracting the risk period of pneumonia and sending out an alarm. Infection is the most common cause of hospital‐acquired pneumonia, which is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality in elderly hospitalized patients.4 In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of this system for detecting the risk period of pneumonia on the basis of continuously monitored respiratory rates in elderly bedridden hospitalized patients.

Introduction:TIGIT (T-cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif [ITIM] domain) is an inhibitory immunoreceptor expressed by T and natural killer (NK) cells that is an important regulator of anti-tumor and anti-viral immunity. TIGIT shares its high-affinity ligand PVR (CD155) with the activating receptor CD226 (DNAM-1). We have recently shown that TIGIT blockade, together with PD-L1/PD-1 blockade, provides robust efficacy in syngeneic tumor and chronic viral infection models. Importantly, CD226 blockade abrogates the benefit of TIGIT blockade, suggesting additional benefit of TIGIT blockade through elaboration of CD226-mediated anti-tumor immunity, analogous to CTLA-4/CD28 regulation of T-cell immunity. Whether TIGIT and CD226 are expressed in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and how TIGIT expression relates to PD-L1/PD-1 expression is unknown. Here we evaluate expression of TIGIT, CD226, PD-1 and PD-L1 in patients with MM to inform novel immunotherapy combinations. Methods:We performed multi-color flow cytometry (n = 25 patients), and multiplex qRT-PCR (n = 7) on bone marrow specimens from patients with MM to assess expression of TIGIT, CD226, PD-1, and PD-L1 on tumor and immune cells. Cells were stained with fluorescently conjugated monoclonal antibodies to label T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8), NK cells (CD56, CD3), plasma cells (CD38, CD45, CD319, CD56), inhibitory/activating receptors (PD-1, TIGIT, PD-L1, CD226), and an amine-reactive viability dye (7-AAD). Stained and fixed cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using BD FACSCanto™ and BD LSRFortessa™. Results:TIGIT, CD226 and PD-L1/PD-1 were detectable by flow cytometry in all patients with MM who were tested, with some overlapping and distinct expression patterns. TIGIT was commonly expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (median, 65% of cells), CD4+ T cells (median, 12%) and NK cells. In contrast, CD226 was more commonly expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD4+ T cells (median, 74%) compared with CD8+ T cells (median, 38%). PD-1 was expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (median 38%) and CD4+ T cells (median, 16%). TIGIT was co-expressed with PD-1 on CD8+ T cells (67%-97% TIGIT+ among PD-1+), although many PD-1-negative CD8+ T cells also expressed TIGIT (39%-78% of PD-1-negative). PD-L1 was also expressed by CD8+ (median, 23%) and CD4+ (median, 8%) T cells in addition to MM plasma cells (median, 95%), albeit with significantly lower intensity on T cells compared with plasma cells. The expression of TIGIT and PD-L1 mRNA was highly correlated (R2 = 0.80). Analysis of PVR expression will also be presented. Conclusions: TIGIT, CD226, PD-1, and PD-L1 were commonly expressed in MM bone marrow, but with different patterns. Among CD8+ T cells, the frequency of TIGIT+ T cells was almost twice that of PD-1+ T cells, whereas the majority of CD4+ T cells expressed CD226. TIGIT blockade may complement anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy by activating distinct T-cell/NK-cell subsets with synergistic clinical benefit. These results provide new insight into the immune microenvironment of MM and rationale for targeting both the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and TIGIT in MM. Disclosures Yadav: Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Green:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Ma:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Robert:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Glibicky:Makro Technologies Inc.: Employment; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy. Nakamura:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Sumiyoshi:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Meng:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chu:Genentech Inc.: Employment. Wu:Genentech: Employment. Byon:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Woodard:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Adamkewicz:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Grogan:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Venstrom:Roche-Genentech: Employment.

Bispecific antibodies that retarget cytotoxic T cell activity to kill cancer cells are currently under clinical evaluation. However, the molecular mechanism for how CD3-bispecific antibodies 'trigger' intracellular T cell signaling is not known. We demonstrate that bispecific antibodies invoke an equivalent biophysical mechanism of TCR triggering as that observed for the TCR/pMHC interaction, including target clustering and exclusion of CD45 phosphatase from the synapse. The dimensions of the target molecule play a key role in the efficiency of the synapse formation. However, we demonstrate that rational epitope selection can overcome the spatial inhibition caused by target molecules with a large extracellular domain and result in efficient synapse formation and highly potent T cell triggering. With this insight, we developed a novel T-cell dependent bispecific (TDB) antibody, anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB, targeting the B cell lineage marker FcRH5 for multiple myeloma. Anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB demonstrated cytotoxicity against human plasma cells and patient derived myeloma tumor cells at picomolar doses. Very low target expression level is sufficient to induce anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB mediated killing, indicating broad activity in multiple myeloma where the prevalence of FcRH5 expression is 100%. In primates, anti-FcRH5/CD3 treatment resulted in complete depletion of tissue B cells and bone marrow plasma cells. Anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB induces immunosuppressive feedback signaling, including PD1 up-regulation, which can be overcome by PD-L1 antibodies. These data demonstrate the potential for the anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB, alone or in combination with inhibition of PD1/PDL1 signaling in the treatment of multiple myeloma and other B-cell malignancies. Disclosures Li: Genentech: Employment. Stagg:Genentech: Employment. Johnston:Genentech: Employment. DiCara:Genentech: Employment. Clark:Genentech: Employment. Cook:Genentech: Employment. Slaga:Genentech: Employment. Nakamura:Genentech: Employment. Luke:Genentech: Employment. Sukumaran:Genentech: Employment. Luis:Genentech: Employment. Ye:Genentech: Employment. Sumiyoshi:Genentech: Employment. Danilenko:Genentech: Employment. Lee:Genentech: Employment. Totpal:Genentech: Employment. Ellerman:Genentech: Employment. Hötzel:Genentech: Employment. Junttila:Genentech: Employment.