Search

The objective of the study was to compare psychiatric outcomes in adults with and without history of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). Youth ages 6 to 14 years hospitalized for TBI from 1992 to 1994 were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury. In the current study, psychiatric assessments were repeated at 24 years post-injury with the same cohort, now adults ages 29 to 39 years. A control group of healthy adults also was recruited for one-time cross-sectional assessments. Outcome measures included: 1) presence of a psychiatric disorder since the 24-month assessment not present before the TBI ("novel psychiatric disorder," NPD), or in the control group, the presence of a psychiatric disorder that developed after the mean age of injury of the TBI group plus 2 years; and 2) Time-to-Event for onset of an NPD during the same time periods. In the TBI group, NPDs were significantly more common, and presence of a current NPD was significantly predicted by presence of a pre-injury lifetime psychiatric disorder and by abnormal day-of-injury computed tomography (CT) scan. Compared with controls, the TBI group also had significantly shorter Time-to-Event for onset of any NPD. These findings demonstrate that long-term psychiatric outcomes in adults previously hospitalized for pediatric TBI are significantly worse when compared with adult controls without history of pediatric TBI, both in terms of prevalence and earlier onset of NPD. Further, in the TBI group, long-term NPD outcome is predicted independently by presence of pre-injury psychiatric disorder and abnormal day-of-injury CT scan.

A growing body of research supports self-management approaches that can improve outcomes in people living with epilepsy (PLWE). An evidence-based remotely delivered self-management program (SMART) that was successfully delivered in an urban/suburban setting has the potential to be particularly helpful to PLWE who live in rural communities, where heavy stigma burden and limited access to healthcare is common. In this Phase 1 exploratory study, focus groups of key rural stakeholders (PLWE, family members, care providers) were used to: (1) gather information on factors that may impede or facilitate participation in SMART and (2) elicit overall perceptions of the program, as well as suggestions and feedback for refining it for implementation in Phase 2 of the randomized controlled study (RCT). Qualitative data analysis revealed that focus group participants identified geographic and social isolation, and the more limited access to epilepsy care, as the major barriers to epilepsy self-management for rural populations. However, they felt strongly that SMART could fill an epilepsy care gap in rural communities, and provided suggestions for recruitment and retention strategies of subjects, as well as improvement/modifications to the program curriculum for the Phase 2 RCT.