Search

Patients with metastatic melanoma often receive 18F-FDG PET/CT scans on different scanners throughout their monitoring period. In this study, we quantified the impact of scanner harmonization on longitudinal changes in PET standardized uptake values using various harmonization and normalization methods, including an anthropomorphic PET phantom. Twenty metastatic melanoma patients received at least two FDG PET/CT scans, each on two different scanners with an average of 4 months (range: 2–8) between. Scans from a General Electric (GE) Discovery 710 PET CT−1 were harmonized to the GE Discovery VCT using image reconstruction settings matching recovery coefficients in an anthropomorphic phantom with bone equivalent inserts and wall-less synthetic lesions. In patient images, SUVmax was measured for each melanoma lesion and time-point. Lesions were classified as progressing, stable, or responding based on pre-defined threshold of ±30% change in SUVmax. For comparison, harmonization was also performed using simpler methods, including harmonization using a NEMA phantom, post-reconstruction filtering, reference region normalization of SUVmax, and use of SUVpeak instead of SUVmax. In the 20 patients, 90 lesions across two time-points were available for treatment response assessment. Treatment response classification changed in 47% (42/90) of cases after harmonization with anthropomorphic phantom. Before harmonization, 37% (33/90) of the lesions were classified as stable (changing less than 30% between two time-points), while the fraction of stable lesions increased to 58% (52/90) after harmonization. Harmonization with the NEMA phantom agreed with harmonization with the anthropomorphic phantom in 91% (82/90) of cases. Post-reconstruction filtering agreed with anthropomorphic phantom-based harmonization in 83% (75/90) cases. The utilization of reference regions for normalization or SUVpeak was unable to correct for changes as identified by the anthropomorphic phantom-based harmonization. Overall, PET scanner harmonization has a major impact on individual lesion treatment response classification in metastatic melanoma patients. Harmonization using the NEMA phantom yielded similar results to harmonization using anthropomorphic phantom, while the only acceptable post-reconstruction technique was post-reconstruction filtering. Phantom-based harmonization is therefore strongly recommended when comparing lesion uptake across time-points when the images have been acquired on different PET scanners.

Purpose: Oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT acquisition and reconstruction protocols need to be optimized for both quantitative and detection tasks. To date, most studies have focused on either quantification or noise, leading to quantitative harmonization guidelines or appropriate noise levels. We developed and evaluated protocols that provide harmonized quantitation with optimal amount of noise as a function of acquisition parameters and body mass. Methods: Multiple image acquisitions (N = 17) of the IEC/NEMA PET image quality phantom were performed with variable counting statistics. Phantom images were reconstructed with OSEM3D and PSF reconstructions for harmonized CRCmax quantification. The lowest counting statistics that resulted in compliance with EANM recommendations for CRCmax and CRCmax variability were used as optimization metrics. Image noise in the liver of 48 typical oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT studies was analysed with OSEM3D and PSF harmonized reconstructions. 164 additional 18F-FDG PET/CT reconstructed list mode images were also evaluated to derive analytical expressions that predict image quality and noise variability. Phantom to subject translational analysis was used to derive optimized acquisition and reconstruction protocols. Results: For harmonized quantitation levels, PSF reconstructions yielded decreased noise and lower CRCmax variability compared with regular OSEM3D reconstructions, suggesting they could enable a decreased activity regimen for matched performance. Conclusion: A PSF reconstruction with 7mm post-filter can provide harmonized quantification performance and acceptable image noise levels with injected activity, duration, and mass settings of 260 MBq.s/kg acquisition parameter at scan time. Similarly, the OSEM3D with 5mm post filter can provide similar performance with 401 MBq.s/kg.

Purpose: This paper describes a method to achieve consistent clinical image quality in 18F-FDG scans accounting for patient habitus, dose regimen, image acquisition, and processing techniques. Methods: Oncological PET/CT scan data for 58 subjects were evaluated retrospectively to derive analytical curves that predict image quality. Patient noise equivalent count rate and coefficient of variation (CV) were used as metrics in their analysis. Optimized acquisition protocols were identified and prospectively applied to 179 subjects. Results: The adoption of different schemes for three body mass ranges ( 90 kg) allows improved image quality with both point spread function and ordered-subsets expectation maximization-3D reconstruction methods. The application of this methodology showed that CV improved significantly (p < 0.0001) in clinical practice. Conclusions: Consistent oncological PET/CT image quality on a high-performance scanner was achieved from an analysis of the relations existing between dose regimen, patient habitus, acquisition, and processing techniques. The proposed methodology may be used by PET/CT centers to develop protocols to standardize PET/CT imaging procedures and achieve better patient management and cost-effective operations.

PURPOSE Quantification in positron emission tomography (PET) is subject to bias due to physical and technical limitations. The goal of quantitative harmonization is to achieve comparable measurements between different scanners, thus enabling multicenter clinical trials. Clinical guidelines, such as those from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), recommend harmonizing PET reconstructions to bring contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) within specifications. However, these harmonized reconstructions can show quantitative biases. In this work we improve harmonization by using a novel adaptive filtering scheme. Our goal was to obtain low quantification bias and high peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) values at the same time. METHODS a novel three-stage adaptive denoising filter was implemented. Filter parameters were optimized to achieve both high PSNR in a digital brain phantom and low quantitative bias of maximum CRC values (CRCmax) obtained from a National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) PET image quality phantom. The NEMA phantom was scanned on several PET/CT scanners and reconstructed without postfilters. The optimal filter settings found for a training dataset were then applied to testing reconstructions from other scanners. Harmonization limits were defined using the 95% confidence intervals across reconstructions. RESULTS Average CRCmax values close to unity (± 5%) were achieved for spheres with diameter equal or greater than 13 mm for the training dataset. PSNR values were comparable to other state-of-the-art filter results. Using the same optimal filter settings for the testing datasets, similar quantitative results were found. Lesion conspicuity was improved on clinical scans when compared with EANM reconstructions, with no visible artifacts. CONCLUSIONS Our three-stage adaptive filter achieved state-of-the-art quantitative performance for PET imaging. Harmonization tolerances with lower bias and variance than EANM guidelines were achieved for a variety of scanner models. CRCmax values were close to unity and the quantification variability was reduced when compared with standard reconstructions.

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows for measurement of activity concentrations of a given radiotracer in vivo. The quantitative capabilities of PET imaging are particularly important in the context of monitoring response to treatment, where quantitative changes in tracer uptake could be used as a biomarker of treatment response. Reconstruction algorithms and settings have a significant impact on PET quantification. In this work we introduce a novel harmonization methodology requiring only a simple cylindrical phantom and show that it can match the performance of more complex harmonization approaches based on phantoms with spherical inserts. Resolution and noise measurements from cylindrical phantoms are used to simulate the spherical inserts from NEMA image quality phantoms. An optimization algorithm was used to find the optimal smoothing filters for the simulated NEMA phantom images to identify those that best harmonized the PET scanners. Our methodology was tested on seven different PET models from two manufacturers installed at five institutions. Our methodology is able to predict contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) from NEMA phantoms with errors within ±5.2% for CRCmax and ±3.7% for CRCmean (limits of agreement = 95%). After applying the proposed harmonization protocol, all the CRC values were within the tolerances from EANM. Quantitative harmonization in compliance with the EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation program is achieved in a simpler way, without the need of NEMA phantoms. This may lead to simplified scanner harmonization workflows more accessible to smaller institutions.