Steven A. Williams, Kendra Byrd, Jenna Swarthout, Gouthami Rao, Christine P. Stewart, MaryAnne Mureithi, Ryan Mahoney, Nils Pilotte, Marlene K. Wolfe, Benard Chieng, John M. Colford, Benjamin F. Arnold, Theodora Meerkerk, Amy J. Pickering, Sammy M. Njenga, Priscah Cheruiyot, Holly N. Dentz, Audrie Lin, Jimmy H. Kihara, Lauren Steinbaum, Marina Papaiakovou, Clair Null, and Byass, Peter
Background Helminth and protozoan infections affect more than 1 billion children globally. Improving water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition could be more sustainable control strategies for parasite infections than mass drug administration, while providing other quality of life benefits. Methods and findings We enrolled geographic clusters of pregnant women in rural western Kenya into a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01704105) that tested 6 interventions: water treatment, improved sanitation, handwashing with soap, combined water treatment, sanitation, and handwashing (WSH), improved nutrition, and combined WSH and nutrition (WSHN). We assessed intervention effects on parasite infections by measuring Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, and Giardia duodenalis among children born to the enrolled pregnant women (index children) and their older siblings. After 2 years of intervention exposure, we collected stool specimens from 9,077 total children aged 2 to 15 years in 622 clusters, including 2,346 children in an active control group (received household visits but no interventions), 1,117 in the water treatment arm, 1,160 in the sanitation arm, 1,141 in the handwashing arm, 1,064 in the WSH arm, 1,072 in the nutrition arm, and 1,177 in the WSHN arm. In the control group, 23% of children were infected with A. lumbricoides, 1% with T. trichiura, 2% with hookworm, and 39% with G. duodenalis. The analysis included 4,928 index children (median age in years: 2) and 4,149 older siblings (median age in years: 5); study households had an average of 5 people, 90% had dirt floors. Compared to the control group, Ascaris infection prevalence was lower in the water treatment arm (prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.82 [95% CI 0.67, 1.00], p = 0.056), the WSH arm (PR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.63, 0.96], p = 0.021), and the WSHN arm (PR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.64, 0.96], p = 0.017). We did not observe differences in Ascaris infection prevalence between the control group and the arms with the individual interventions sanitation (PR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.73, 1.08], p = 0.228), handwashing (PR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.73, 1.09], p = 0.277), or nutrition (PR: 86 [95% CI 0.71, 1.05], p = 0.148). Integrating nutrition with WSH did not provide additional benefit. Trichuris and hookworm were rarely detected, resulting in imprecise effect estimates. No intervention reduced Giardia. Reanalysis of stool samples by quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed the reductions in Ascaris infections measured by microscopy in the WSH and WSHN groups. Trial limitations included imperfect uptake of targeted intervention behaviors, limited power to detect effects on rare parasite infections, and that it was not feasible to blind participants and sample collectors to treatment status. However, lab technicians and data analysts were blinded to treatment status. The trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the United States Agency for International Development. Conclusions Integration of improved water quality, sanitation, and handwashing could contribute to sustainable control strategies for Ascaris infections, particularly in similar settings with recent or ongoing deworming programs. Combining nutrition with WSH did not provide further benefits, and water treatment alone was similarly effective to integrated WSH. Our findings provide new evidence that drinking water should be given increased attention as a transmission pathway for Ascaris. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01704105., Interventions for improved water and hygiene in pregnant women in Kenya resulted in fewer Ascaris infections in newborns, Amy Pickering and colleagues reveal., Author summary Why was this study done? Intestinal worm and protozoan infections affect >1 billion children and are associated with growth faltering and impaired cognitive development. High reinfection rates can prevent mass drug administration programs from eliminating transmission. Improved water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition could interrupt environmental transmission of parasites, but few trials evaluating these interventions have measured parasite infections as an outcome. What did the researchers do and find? The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial among a birth cohort to test if single and combined improved drinking water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition interventions can reduce intestinal worm and Giardia infections. The authors measured parasite infections after 2 years of intervention exposure. The authors demonstrated that water treatment alone and integrated water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions can sustainably reduce roundworm (Ascaris) infection prevalence among young children in Kenya. Improved nutrition did not enhance the effectiveness of the water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions, and none of the interventions reduced Giardia. What do these findings mean? Improving water quality, sanitation, and handwashing concurrently in the household environment can protect children from infection with Ascaris. The study also provides evidence that water treatment alone may provide a similar level of protection against Ascaris infection, suggesting that combining water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions does not yield greater health benefits than implementing single interventions. Treating drinking water is a relatively unexplored strategy for controlling intestinal worm infections, and drinking water should be given increased attention as an ingestion exposure pathway for Ascaris eggs.