Search

Background Earlier we have shown that high frequency of acinar cells in the pancreatic transsection line predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Acinar cell count method (ACM) is fast to perform during operation. In this study our aim was to validate the accuracy of ACM to compare it with other published risk prediction methods. Methods 87 patients who underwent PD without any trial including perioperative medications were collected from a single hospital. Data on demographics, surgical details, postoperative complications clinically relevant pancreatic fistulae (CR-POPF) and clinically relevant Clavien-Dindo complications (CR-CDC) were registered. Thirteen previously published risk prediction methods were included in the comparison, such as pancreatic duct diameter, palpable texture of pancreas, Braga score (BC), Fistula Risk Score, Modified Fistula Risk Score, Alternative Fistula Risk Score and multiple radiological parameters. ROC-curves were calculated to compare sensitivity and specificity for identifying high risk patients for CR-POPF and CR-CDC. Results The three most accurate risk prediction methods for CR-POPF were ACM (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 52.6%; p = 0.043), BC (87.5%, 56.6%; p = 0.039) and visceral fat area to subcutaneous fat area ratio (75.5%, 80.0%; p = 0.032). In predicting CR-CDC the three most accurate methods were ACM (73.9%, 56.2%; p = 0.033), BC (68.4%, 59.5%; p = 0.036) and TPAI (78.3%, 41.7%; p = 0.012). Conclusion ACM was shown to be as good as the more complicated risk scoring methods in the prediction of CR-POPF. It was good also in predicting all clinically relevant complications. ACM is easy to use during operation and can be recommended as a routine risk prediction method.

Objectives: The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate whether three-dimensional texture analysis (3D-TA) features of non-contrast-enhanced T1 weighted MRI associate with traditional prognostic factors and disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer. Methods: 3D-T1 weighted images from 78 patients with 81 malignant histopathologically verified breast lesions were retrospectively analysed using standard-size volumes of interest. Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based features were selected for statistical analysis. In statistics the Mann–Whitney U and the Kruskal–Wallis tests, the Cox proportional hazards model and the Kaplan–Meier method were used. Results: Tumours with higher histological grade were significantly associated with higher contrast (1 voxel: p = 0.033, 2 voxels: p = 0.036). All the entropy parameters showed significant correlation with tumour grade (p = 0.015–0.050) but there were no statistically significant associations between other TA parameters and tumour grade. The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) was correlated with contrast and sum entropy parameters. A higher sum variance TA parameter was a significant predictor of shorter DFS. Conclusion: Texture parameters, assessed by 3D-TA from non-enhanced T1 weighted images, indicate tumour heterogeneity but have limited independent prognostic value. However, they are associated with tumour grade, NPI, and DFS. These parameters could be used as an adjunct to contrast-enhanced TA parameters. Advances in knowledge: 3D-TA of non-contrast enhanced T1 weighted breast MRI associates with tumour grade, NPI, and DFS. The use of non-contrast 3D-TA parameters in adjunct with contrast-enhanced 3D-TA parameters warrants further research.

Computerized parenchymal analysis has shown potential to be utilized as an imaging biomarker to estimate the risk of breast cancer. Parenchymal analysis of digital mammograms is based on the extraction of computerized measures to build machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer risk. However, the choice of the region of interest (ROI) for feature extraction within the breast remains an open problem. In this work we perform a comparison between five different methods suggested in the literature for automated ROI selection, including the whole breast (WB), the maximum squared (MS), the retro-areolar region (RA), the lattice-based (LB), and the polar-based (PB) selection methods. For the experiments, we built a retrospective dataset of 896 screening mammograms from 224 women (112 cases and 112 healthy controls). The performance of each ROI selection method was measured in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) values. The AUC values varied between 0.55 and 0.79 depending on the method and experimental settings. The best performance on an independent test set was achieved by the MS method (AUC of 0.59, 95% CI: 0.55-0.64). This method is fully-automated and does not require adjusting hyper-parameters. Based on our results, we prompt the use of the MS method for ROI selection in the computerized parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.

Purpose To assess the association between breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal measures obtained using a fully-automated, publicly available software, OpenBreast. Methods This retrospective case-control study involved screening mammograms of asymptomatic women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2016 and 2017. The 114 cases were matched with corresponding healthy controls by birth and screening years and the mammographic system used. Parenchymal analysis was performed using OpenBreast, a software implementing a computerized parenchymal analysis algorithm. Breast percent density was measured with an interactive thresholding method. The parenchymal measures were Box-Cox transformed and adjusted for age and percent density. Changes in the odds ratio per standard deviation (OPERA) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for parenchymal measures and percent densities were used to evaluate the discrimination between cases and controls. Differences in AUCs were assessed using DeLong’s test. Results The adjusted OPERA value of parenchymal measures was 2.49 (95% CI: 1.79–3.47). Parenchymal measures using OpenBreast were more accurate (AUC = 0.779) than percent density (AUC = 0.609) in discriminating between cases and controls (p Conclusions Parenchymal measures obtained with the evaluated software were positively associated with breast cancer risk and were more accurate than percent density in the prediction of risk.

Breast density has been identified as one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. However, the development of reliable and reproducible methods for the automatic dense tissue segmentation has been an important challenge. Due to the complexity of the acquisition process of mammography images, current approaches need to be calibrated for specific mammographic systems or require access to raw mammograms. In this work, we introduce the Morphological Area Gradient (MAG) as a generic measure for mammography images. MAG is generic in the sense that it does not need calibration or access to raw mammograms. At the core of MAG is the derivative of the area of segmented tissue with respect to the pixel intensity. We have found that the high-density regions can be automatically segmented by minimizing the MAG of a mammogram. To verify the performance of MAG, we collected 566 full-field digital mammograms using two different medical devices and a human expert manually annotated the high-density regions in each image. The proposed MAG method yields a median absolute error of 7.6% and a Dices similarity coefficient of 0.83, which are superior to other clinically validated state-of-the-art algorithms.

Mammography is one of the main diagnostic tools for the breast and is increasingly utilized for breast cancer risk assessment. Recently, parenchymal analysis has emerged as a computational tool that works by extracting imaging features from mammograms in order to infer the level of risk of a patient. In standard screening mammography, two views for each breast are obtained: the cranio-caudal (CC) and the medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views. However, to the best of our knowledge, the question of whether the choice of a given view can influence the performance of parenchymal analysis has not been researched in the literature. The aim of this work is to evaluate the utilization of different views for risk estimation based on the computerized analysis of parenchymal patterns in mammography images. We implemented a parenchymal analysis method and tested it on a sample of 228 women in a retrospective case/control study. Based on the obtained results we support the use of the CC view for parenchymal analysis since this reduces computational cost without affecting performance.

Objectives: To assess the impact of supine, prone and oblique patient imaging positions on the image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) value in the maxillofacial region using a CBCT scanner. Furthermore, the CBCT supine images were compared with supine multislice CT (MSCT) images.Methods: One fresh frozen cadaver head was scanned in prone, supine and oblique imaging positions using a mobile CBCT scanner. MSCT images of the head were acquired in a supine position. Two radiologists graded the CBCT and MSCT images at ten different anatomical sites according to their image quality using a six-point scale. The CNR and FOM values were calculated at two different anatomical sites on the CBCT and MSCT images.Results: The best image quality was achieved in the prone imaging position for sinus, mandible and maxilla, followed by the supine and oblique imaging positions. 12-mA prone images presented high delineation scores for all anatomical landmarks, except for the ear region (carotid canal), which presented adequate to poor delineation scores for all studied head positions and exposure parameters. The MSCT scanner offered similar image qualities to the 7.5-mA supine images acquired using the mobile CBCT scanner. The prone imaging position offered the best CNR and FOM values on the mobile CBCT scanner.Conclusions: Head positioning has an impact on CBCT image quality. The best CBCT image quality can be achieved using the prone and supine imaging positions. The oblique imaging position offers inadequate image quality except in the sinus region.