1. Comparison of two needles arthrocentesis versus double needle cannula arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement
- Author
-
Luciano Ambrosio Ferreira, Liogi Iwaki Filho, Ênio Tadashi Setogutti, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki, and Eduardo Grossmann
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Joint Dislocations ,Pain ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Disc displacement ,medicine ,Cannula ,Humans ,Range of Motion, Articular ,General Dentistry ,Orthodontics ,Temporomandibular Joint ,business.industry ,Arthrocentesis ,030206 dentistry ,Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ,Treatment Outcome ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Needles ,Temporomandibular joint disc displacement ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
To compare clinical and imaging results of two needles arthrocentesis (TNA) versus double-needle cannula arthrocentesis (DNCA) in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disc displacement (DD).Twenty patients with DD were randomly divided into two groups: TNA and DNCA. Clinical data (pain scores; maximal interincisal distance [MID], and protrusion and laterality movements) were evaluated before and 24 months after the arthrocentesis. Disc and condyle position and joint effusion (JE) were evaluated by magnetic resonance exams.Both groups presented improvement in the MID, including pain reduction, modifications in disc and condyle positions, and reduction of the presence of JE, without difference between groups (Both TNA and DNCA are efficient in promoting improvement in the MID: reduction in pain, modifications in disc and condyle positions, and, in part, may account for less JE, without difference between techniques.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF