1. 20-kHz alternating current stimulation: effects on motor and somatosensory thresholds
- Author
-
Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Julio Gómez-Soriano, Cristina Simon-Martinez, Julian Taylor, and Juan Avendaño-Coy
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Neurology ,Nerve block ,medicine.medical_treatment ,0206 medical engineering ,Transcutaneous stimulation ,Health Informatics ,Stimulation ,02 engineering and technology ,Somatosensory system ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Peripheral nerve ,High-frequency ,medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Peripheral Nerves ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,Transcutaneous electric stimulation ,Cross-Over Studies ,Hand Strength ,Detection threshold ,Stimulation technique ,business.industry ,Research ,Rehabilitation ,020601 biomedical engineering ,Healthy Volunteers ,Sensory Thresholds ,Anesthesia ,Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ,Female ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background High frequency alternating current (HFAC) stimulation have been shown to produce a peripheral nerve conduction block. Currently, all the studies applying HFAC stimulation in clinical studies, have employed frequencies below 10 kHz. The main aim of this work was to investigate the neuromodulatory effect of transcutaneous 20 kHz stimulation on somatosensory and pain thresholds, and maximal handgrip strength. Methods A randomized, crossover, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted following recruitment of fourteen healthy volunteers. Transcutaneous stimulation at 20 kHz and sham stimulation were applied over the ulnar and median nerves of fourteen healthy volunteers for 20 min. Maximal handgrip strength (MHS), mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were registered prior to, during (15 min), immediately after the end (20 min), and 10 min following stimulation. Results The 20 kHz stimulation showed a lower MHS during the stimulation at the 15 min (30.1 kgs SE 2.8) and at 20 min (31.8 kgs, SE 2.8) when compared to sham stimulation (35.1 kgs, SE 3.4; p p = 0.03, respectively). The 20 kHz stimulation resulted in a slight increase in MDT at 15 min (0.25 mN; 0.25–2.00) when compared to the sham stimulation (0.25 mN; 0.25–0.25; p = 0.02), and no effects were showed for PPT. Conclusions High-frequency stimulation at 20 kHz suggests a partial block of nerve activity. Studies in subjects with neurological disorders characterized by nerve hyperactivity are needed to confirm the clinical impact of this non-invasive electrical stimulation technique. Trial registration NCT, NCT02837458. Registered on 12 April 2017.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF