1. Observational study of the suspected or confirmed cases of sars COV-2 infection needing emergency surgical intervention during the first months of the pandemic in a third level hospital: Case series
- Author
-
Noé I Gracida-Mancilla, Jed Raful-Zacarías-Ezzat, Luis Gabriel González-Pérez, Dra Mariel González-Calatayud, Dra Gabriela E. Gutiérrez-Uvalle, Benito Vargas-Abrego, Dra Sandra C. López-Romero, and José Alberto Carranco-Martínez
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,law.invention ,Sepsis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Obstetrics and gynaecology ,Surgical procedures ,law ,Laparotomy ,medicine ,Case Series ,SARS-CoV 2 infection ,business.industry ,General surgery ,Mortality rate ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Intensive care unit ,COVID 19 pandemic ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Emergency surgery ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Observational study ,Surgery ,business ,Complication - Abstract
Approximately 28, 404, 603 surgical events have been suspended in the 12 peak weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to report all the surgically intervened patients with suspected or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection from April 1 to July 31, 2020, and to estimate their prognosis in the Surgical Therapy Department of a third level hospital in Mexico. Method We conducted an observational study of patients undergoing surgical intervention in the operating room assigned as COVID, where we considered age, sex, treating department, type of intervention, and initial biomarkers (first five days of hospitalization), days of hospital stay, days in the Intensive Care Unit and reason for discharge. Results 42 patients have been surgically intervened, with a total of 49 surgeries. For Otolaringology and General Surgery, there were more deceased cases than alive cases; while for Thoracic Surgery, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, there were more alive cases than deceased ones (36% and 0% deceased, respectively), with statistically significant differences (p = 0.014). With regard to mortality for each group of surgical procedure, patients who underwent C-section or pleurostomy had a mortality rate of 0%; the mortality rate for patients who underwent tracheostomy was 52%; patients who underwent laparotomy had a mortality rate of 54%; for those who underwent debridement, the mortality rate was 100%; which show significant differences, with a p value of 0.03. Discussion we identified an overall mortality rate of 42.8%, with a significant difference between treating departments and type of surgical procedure. This can be explained because many of the General Surgery patients, in addition to their infectious process by COVID-19, had another complication, like sepsis, In the same way, we can say that pregnant patients are healthy and have a physiological condition. Finally, patients undergoing an open tracheostomy had solely pulmonary complications. Conclusion There is no doubt that we face an unknown condition for which we have been learning tests along the way. This sample of cases undergoing surgery at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic can provide clues on relevant results that we must consider for future cases., Highlights • There is a relation between patients undergoing emergency surgery with SARS-Cov-2 infection and higher mortality rate. • The SARS CoV2 Infection had an important impact in the surgical productivity with a decrease of 85%. • The overall mortality rate for patients with SARS CoV2 infection that were intervened for emergency surgery was 42.8%. • There is a significant difference between treating departments and type of surgical procedure with the mortality rate.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF